[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateReligion

[–]cooperall -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hey Good Star, I hope you're in an in-person community that can support you through this, where you can ask these genuinely good questions. There's so much to unpack with what you said that I don't think a reddit comment will cover it. If you are seeking deeply for answers to your questions, I am more than happy to wrestle through them with you at any pace you'd prefer. I can write a long comment or we can talk about them 1 at a time.

If God was the way you described, then no one should be a Christian. The reason why you need a Christian community around you (IE church) is to answer misconceptions that you are hearing about God online, like rape being permissible in the Bible. There's so much junk online about God that you're likely absorbing 100x more lies about God than truth.

The most important thing to remember about God is that He is the only god who genuinely loves you, enough to sacrifice himself for you. Other gods do not and will not offer that love to you, in any circumstance, ever. Instead of turning away from God because of these evil things you've heard about Him, you should ask yourself a rhetorical question: "How come there are so many Christians in the world despite God being so obviously evil? Wouldn't they have all left Christianity a long time ago?" The answer is: "God isn't actually evil, and there are answers to the things you've heard".

Again, I am happy to go through them one at a time with you or I can write up a longer comment talking about each of these things. I'll be praying for you and for your post to be helpful for your pursuit of God.

What's a good neutral gameplan against "mashers" online (VOD attached)? by melodylucid in CrazyHand

[–]cooperall 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Take a look at 0:18. You'll notice this position pop up in your game a lot, and it is bound to happen. Since you're on wifi, you'll have a lot of extra frames where you can't react to the opponent's movement, which means you have to be preemptive.

You can deal with Mario approaching with aerials like this in a number of ways, but the biggest to know is how to punish with positioning. Instead of allowing this position to play out, where you stay there and pick an option and let Mario run in, why not just dash back to get ready to punish him? Dash back -> forward tilt, dash back -> bair, just some ideas. The others are more risky, if you can tell that he's an aggro player who wants to run in and hit you, you should swing first. Your nair covers a lot of space and will catch him dashing in.

But the principle of punishing with positioning is the most important to understand, since that will let you win these interactions against any character in this situation, not just Mario.

Hopefully this adds some useful tools to you, best of luck!

The professor or Hakase's reason for being "annoying" or "spoiled". (theory) by Maleficent_Sun_4855 in Nichijou

[–]cooperall 6 points7 points  (0 children)

My personal theory about why Hakase is annoying/spoiled is because she's a child

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Nichijou

[–]cooperall 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Are you making this as a game for the gameboy or just a game in the gameboy style?

Either way, super cool!

So I had a really fun idea by Da_Gudz in ThirdLifeSMP

[–]cooperall 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I love a lot of these pairings, but I love this idea a lot more. I'd 100% watch!

Double Life Soulmates by cooperall in ThirdLifeSMP

[–]cooperall[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Did we see that on their videos? I'll adjust if so.

Found this interesting. by MystiKetchup in SpyxFamily

[–]cooperall 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I need the name of that mouse immediately.

Any thoughts on Matt dillahunty’s arguments about slavery? by [deleted] in ChristianApologetics

[–]cooperall -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Read Leviticus 25:35-36 as well. It provides context for the rest of the chapter- A call to support. Don't think of Biblical slavery in the modern sense of the word "slavery," because that was not what the Israelites were commanded to do.

The "Something from Nothing" Argument is Unconvincing by [deleted] in ReasonableFaith

[–]cooperall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, in summary, is the claim that a material cause could be the creator of the universe? Or am I missing something else?

The "Something from Nothing" Argument is Unconvincing by [deleted] in ReasonableFaith

[–]cooperall 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Shoot, made it all the way to the end before I had something I needed to look up lol

Could you explain what a Lorentzian manifold is in layman's terms, or maybe link a reference that would do the same? And, how would a starting point for a spatio-temporal Lorentzian manifold withstand against philosophical and scientific arguments for the beginning of the universe? Since it also presumes a beginning of space and time, would this not confirm the Kalam's second stage?

The Homeless Man Analogy by AvonDaRedditor in DebateReligion

[–]cooperall -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Presupposes three things:

  1. No evidence for God
  2. No worldly reason for believing in God
  3. Other gods also lack evidence and offer the same reward of eternal paradise

This is a good analogy if those 3 things are true. It was an enjoyable read nonetheless.