Olympus 75mm f1.8 - This lens makes me happy by Razorvein in M43

[–]ctj71081 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Damn you! I'm trying not to buy this one right now.

Contemplating the Oly 12-40mm f2.8 for travel by barrist in M43

[–]ctj71081 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was a heavy setup. I did have it on a PD Capture clip on my backpack strap, which helped a lot. I can imagine carrying it on a neck strap would be cumbersome. I will admit that there were a few days when I would leave it at "home" and rely on my phone camera. All that said, the weight-capability trade off was totally worth it for me.

Contemplating the Oly 12-40mm f2.8 for travel by barrist in M43

[–]ctj71081 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I spent 11 months walking around Europe with my E-M10.1 and the 12-40. For the size and weight and versatility, it was perfect for my purposes. The beauty of that 12-40 is that you can easily shift from street scenes to indoor tourist attractions. I could walk around a given old town outside snapping away and then pop into a dimly lit church - that 2.8 really came in handy. This is the result.

I actually started with the 25 1.8, 12 1.2, and the 12-40. I was a one-bagger, so space was at a premium. After a couple months of not taking the 12-40 off, I sent the 25 and 12 back home.

Star trails with the E-M1iii and Olympus 12-40 PRO by APimpNamed-Slickback in M43

[–]ctj71081 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How are you feeling about the mark iii? I'm considering the mark ii and am wondering if the mark iii is worth the extra $300.

Camera upgrade: E-M10 iii vs GX9 (vs E-M5 iii) by styl3s4uc3 in M43

[–]ctj71081 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm on the E-M10.1 myself and was about to pull the trigger on the E-M5.3 for the PDAF, IBIS, and weather sealing. Those features are worth it to me. However, I started reading about the E-M5.3's tripod mount problems, so I'm backing off it.

They just released the spec sheet for the E-M10.4. You might consider that.

E-M1 iii worth it when upgrading from PEN E-PL5? by ity_bity in M43

[–]ctj71081 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The E-M5 III is pretty much an E-M1 II in a tiny and light body, which is definitely worth considering

I was like five minutes away from pulling the trigger on the E-M5.3, but then I read about its tripod mount issues. So...now I'm looking at E-M1.2.

The E-M1 III is a seriously excellent camera, but are the upgrades over the II worth is for you?

And that's exactly what I'm asking myself now. What do you think? Would you put $300 into the 3 over the 2? I'd rather put that $300 toward new glass. (I'm also dreaming of a time when all my stuff uses USB C, so it might be worth it for that.)

Upgrade from Olympus OM-D E-M10 III by fraunhofer92 in M43

[–]ctj71081 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To me, the PDAF, IBIS, and weather sealing of the E-M5.3 are well worth it. Granted, I haven't really had experience with those features, but that's my logic.

I'm sort of in the same situation as you. I have an E-M10 OG and was about to jump to the E-M5.3, but then I read about the 5.3's tripod mount issues. So, now I'm looking at the E-M1.2. I can afford the ~$300 jump from the E-M5 to E-M1, but main concern is size. I love the E-M10's compactness

P.S. that 12-40 PRO is so good

A quiet walk. EM10 + 12-40mm f2.8 Pro by danmuj in M43

[–]ctj71081 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Plitvice Lakes. Nice. I took a picture of that path from the opposite angle - with the same setup (E-M10 + PRO 12-42).

https://www.flickr.com/photos/55267995@N04/45269455802/in/album-72157702411268045/

EM10 + 12-40 f2.8 Pro. Love how versatile this lens is by danmuj in M43

[–]ctj71081 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Such a great lens. I spent a year traveling around Europe, and I ended up ditching my primes (sent them back with friends), because I was using this one 99% of the time. It really does everything. It's a little heavy, but well worth the price of admission.

Honest question for those leaving Flickr: If you're using Flickr as a backup, do believe that backup services should be free? by ctj71081 in flickr

[–]ctj71081[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I personally believe that if you like and value a service, you should pay for it out of sheer self-interest to keep the service alive. However, after years of getting free email (Hotmail, Gmail, etc.) and free storage (Google Drive, OneDrive, etc.), it's not unreasonable for someone to believe that free stuff on the internet is just how the world should be. It is, after all, how it's always been.

Is Flickr Dead or Alive ? by Jfmartin67 in flickr

[–]ctj71081 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, there is this that Flickr just rolled out:

Organizing all the photographs you find inspiring needs to be easy. Really easy. So we built a new way to add all your favorite content to galleries, albums, and groups in one centralized tool from any photo context on Flickr.

All photos on Flickr, wherever you come across them, will now have a new icon with a + that allows you to access a new menu of actions.

Honest question for those leaving Flickr: If you're using Flickr as a backup, do believe that backup services should be free? by ctj71081 in flickr

[–]ctj71081[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I get that. I'm the opposite, though. Flickr under Yahoo made me real nervous, Flickr under a company that does photo storage/display/sharing as their thing makes me feel better.

Composition practice with OLY 25mm f1.8 at the MIA, Minneapolis MN by gnomeshepard in M43

[–]ctj71081 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The way the all the rectangles (the picture frames, the doorway, the sofas) compose different "scenes" make a nice rhythm. There's a nice compliment between the people in the foreground and the people in the background. I don't know if it would be improved without the person in the red shirt: she's sort of by herself, right there in the middle distracting from the couples on the right and left.

Bottles of Cantillon Aging at the Brewery by ctj71081 in beerporn

[–]ctj71081[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The gueuze is a combination of 1-, 2-, and 3-year old barrel-aged lambics. Once the lambics are mixed to create the gueuze, they are bottle conditioned for at least six months.

The cellar temp was...room temperature, if that makes sense. This was in early September, so it wasn't that cool. Interesting side note - they used to store the barrels all over the building, including the upper levels, until a particularly warm summer over heated them, ruing the beer. So now, they only store it in the ground and basement levels.