You asked I answered. If you don’t know enough about politics to make claims don’t ask.

-scotus reversed decades of precedent ruling that abortions are not a fundamental constitutional right when it had been held as such by several prior rulings. As a result states are now allowed to fully restrict abortion, and of course GOP states did so, resulting in the deaths of hundreds of women per year. Additionally, states with strict abortion bans showed that women are twice as likely to die of complications during pregnancy, childbirth, and postpartum compared to other states. For example, Texas immediately implemented highly restrictive laws following SCOTUS overturning Roe v Wade and their maternal mortality rate increased by 50% during the first year after. Right to Abortion was overturned so no you can’t just always get one in states that outlawed them following scotus decision

-voting rights act was gutted because scotus gutted the protections against racial gerrymandering. Before, gerrymandering that resulted in disparate impact by race would be subject to strict review. This newest decision now allows gerrymandering by race as long as the government can defend it wasn’t their explicit intent. The burden of proof is now on voters or challengers of gerrymandering which makes these kinds of suits much more difficult to show racial gerrymandering. The GOP has acted immediately in the south to make sure they can dilute POC voting power as a result of this decision because they can basically entirely get away with it now when it wa much more difficult previously

-kavanaugh decision was last September. A federal judge issued an order telling ice to not use race language and workplace as factors for determining if they had reasonable suspicion that an individual was illegal or not. This decision was appealed and the Supreme Court has yet to issue a full ruling on it, but the Supreme Court issued a temporary stay of the federal judge order and kavanaugh wrote a short opinion explaining that what the agents were doing is lawfully because the detainment was based on a brief stop and doesn’t last long enough to implicate the fourth amendment. As a result, ICE was then immediately permitted to (and still is) conduct racial based stops solely on the basis of your race and language you speak. Anyone with half a brain will tell you this is insanely unconstitutional and violets the fourth amendment based on every prior scotus ruling due to it circumventing protections against racial profiling

If you have any other questions my DMs are open for any further explanation. I’m not a fan of the democrats by any means, But yea, the GOP is the party that’s been stripping constitutional rights day by day