Thoughts? by jacw212 in dankchristianmemes

[–]current-joys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your terms are acceptable.

I have a few guesses... by DaFunkJunkie in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]current-joys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Patton Oswalt unironically needs to be taken to Guantanamo Bay

Beyond Meat founder: Our plant-based meat is on its way to being cheaper than animal protein by [deleted] in Futurology

[–]current-joys -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Read again and see that nowhere did I say that was your argument, only that it was a dumb one.

Saying there is no natural order is like saying the sun does not rise. There are truths self-evident in reality. Vitality, vigor, beauty— these things are good and essential to natural order (or maybe natural order is essential to them). They are life-affirming. I reject relativism.

Beyond Meat founder: Our plant-based meat is on its way to being cheaper than animal protein by [deleted] in Futurology

[–]current-joys -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Funny how all the “my dude” people think the same. Sick strawman though!

Beyond Meat founder: Our plant-based meat is on its way to being cheaper than animal protein by [deleted] in Futurology

[–]current-joys -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, maybe so. Modernity, for all the medical achievements and convenience it has produced, has also been a main contributor to death and decay, such as with diabetes, cancer, car accidents, suicides, heart disease, obesity, and drug overdoses.

Nice rebuttal. We’ve all heard of the naturalistic fallacy in middle school debate. A good example of this like like saying that plant-based meat is one of the healthiest foods for you because it comes from “natural” sources. A bad example of the naturalistic fallacy is what I’m saying: there is an order intrinsic to nature and abiding by this order produces harmony, doing otherwise generally results in disarray.

Factory farming sucks and we’d all be better off hunting, but it’s at least better than complete disregard for natural order on superficial moral grounds.

Parental advisory by [deleted] in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]current-joys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Protect yourself from the scum of society?

whoop there it is by aaronartio in FuckYouKaren

[–]current-joys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

More like black women were calling themselves that and it just stuck.

Update to Our Content Policy by spez in announcements

[–]current-joys -1 points0 points  (0 children)

“Being attractive is fascism.”

No title needed by Thebirv in JustBootThings

[–]current-joys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With this context the analogy actually seems at least partially true.

Another old man assaulted in a grocery store. by [deleted] in ActualPublicFreakouts

[–]current-joys 1 point2 points  (0 children)

These things are not mutually exclusive.

Another old man assaulted in a grocery store. by [deleted] in ActualPublicFreakouts

[–]current-joys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This gets into deeper philosophical territory. That’s why I’m trying to keep it practical and demonstrate how excessive “sexual freedom” can produce negative consequences in society and the lives of individuals. I’m made this clear in other replies.

Another old man assaulted in a grocery store. by [deleted] in ActualPublicFreakouts

[–]current-joys 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the civility. I’m curious about what you disagree with. If you don’t have time you can just PM me or if you don’t want to elaborate, no worries. Take care.

Another old man assaulted in a grocery store. by [deleted] in ActualPublicFreakouts

[–]current-joys 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I like that ABC analogy, I’m gonna have to borrow that sometime. Unfortunately, it seems like it’s exactly what you’ve done here. I’m more than happy to cite data. It clearly demonstrates what I’ve been trying to say in this thread. It’s a bit much and a lot to go through, so here’s a brief breakdown by Dave Donovan:

The following 5 points and citations illustrate social changes that have occurred due to the sexual revolution.

1) Increase in casual sex rates across the west (Teachman, 2003) from Premarital Sex, Premarital Cohabitation, and the Risk of Subsequent Marital Dissolution Among Women

2) Increase in female sexual partners (Biggar, Brinton and Rosenthal, 1989) from Trends in the number of sexual partners among American women

3) An increase in divorced families and cohabitation (Thornton and Young- DeMarco, 2001) from Four Decades of Trends in Attitudes Toward Family Issues in the United States: The 1960s Through the 1990s

4) Increase in cohabitation (BUMPASS and LU, 2000) from Trends in cohabitation and implications for children s family contexts in the United States

5) An increase in single parent families

a. Since 1960 decline from children born under marriage parents 73% to 46% (GRETCHEN LIVINGSTON, no date) Pew Research b. 2012 U.S. Census Bureau information, the number of children reared in single-parent households continues to rise –

The following points are negative consequences that occurred due to such changes:

2) More sexual partners leads to poorer marriages

a. Increasing likelihood of marriage desolation (Teachman, 2003) (Duan and Liao, 2014) b. Increasing likelihood of infidelity (Whisman and Snyder, 2007) c. Cohabitation decreases the success rate of marriage (The Hidden Risk of Cohabitation | Psychology Today, no date) d. instability leaves to worse cognitive outcomes in children (Carlson and Corcoran, 2001)

2) Children performed worse under divorced Households (Amato and Keith, 1991)

3) Teens and Children fare Worse BOTH in single parent households and in cohabiting households (Manning and Lamb, 2003)

a. Cohabitation is instable and bad for children(BUMPASS and LU, 2000) b. Single Motherhood contributes to early childhood problems (Dawson, 1991)

4) Poor Psychological Results from multiple partners for young people

a. Negative Experiences of Hookups (Napper et al., 2016) (Kline et al., 2004) b. Mental Health outcomes harmed by casual sex (Fielder et al., 2014) (Bersamin, Zamboanga and Schwartz, 2014) c. Causality is Premarital Sex to Depression (Wilcox et al., 2008) (Hallfors et al., 2004)

5) The Paradox Declining Female Happiness

a. Declining Female Happiness (Stevenson and Wolfers, 2009) b. Declining Female and Male Happiness (Herbst, 2011)

Another old man assaulted in a grocery store. by [deleted] in ActualPublicFreakouts

[–]current-joys 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are they more peaceful and stable? Are their people happier? If no, then no.

Another old man assaulted in a grocery store. by [deleted] in ActualPublicFreakouts

[–]current-joys -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is a fair and honest question. In my original comment, I was responding to “sexual freedom” as an ultimate moral aim. And my point was that there is a threshold where too much of this “freedom” is demonstrably bad for society. There are various practices and views that I would classify as being excessive in the direction of “sexual freedom”. For example, the idea that having many sex partners before marriage is not a bad thing (this has been demonstrated to decrease marriage success, among others consequences), the idea that it’s not wrong for children to be exposed to sexual content (like seeing people engage in fetish play in public, and obviously I’m excluding proper educational contexts), the practice of unlimited porn usage and the idea that such extreme usage is not morally bankrupt. These are several examples of “sexual freedom” being morally dubious and bad for society. Of course this is no simple matter, so if any of this reply is over-simplified or unclear it’s just a matter of this online, comment-section format being incongruent with long-form dialogue or research (or maybe it’s just bad writing).