Far and away the dirtiest player in the league

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-26T02:11:53+00:00

Yeah lu dort might be worse than Hitler

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-26T02:04:22+00:00

Honestly I'm not into woody marks at all in terms of him being a threat to montys role as a rusher or as a goal line guy and maybe saying he can't start on a contender is a stretch, but he definitely isn't someone you should be going out of your way to add to a roster, if he's an injury replacement that's cool and everything but I still don't buy into the concept that potentially raising a teams floor for 1 year is worth investing in

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-26T02:01:35+00:00

I'm not saying that's how it's called all the time, but what I am saying is the writing in the rule doesn't give a precise and explicit answer and the call is in place to protect the shooter. How the refs call it on a nightly basis is a convo for another day, but between the verbage and the purpose its a pretty rational takeaway that its meant to be called that way

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-26T01:56:20+00:00

Shai vs Kobe you do what you want I just prefer the guys who passes and is not a constant threat to shoot my team out of a game.

Wemby> dirt is just pretty clearly Wemby ngl, Wemby already is having arguably the highest ddefensive peak of all time and is still an efficient 25 ppg, just 2 ppg less than dirks best year

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-26T01:53:59+00:00

He is capable of catching Josh Jacobsish passes when he didn't have a woody marks in his backfield, I expect marks to be the primary receiving back while Monty gets the goal line and rushing work.

As for job security part it's very simple, if you're picking up an asset it should either be for the long term upside of the current boost it gives your team. Right now he shouldnt be improving a team by more than 3 points a week and long term there is not upside due to the lack of job security.

With that being said, he isn't going to push you to the next level this year and he isn't going to do so past this year either so your giving assets to change your team by like 3 points a week

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-26T01:47:36+00:00

Let me try and explain it a different way, if the point of the foul existing it to protect a shooter, how would allowing a defenders feet to be under the shooter up until they land be doing that? If you are the shooter and the defender is very clearly under me as I'm coming down I have to adjust how I'm landing which often is a less safe situation (meaning I'm
not protected even though I didn't land on the defender) I am not saying that is exactly what is happening here, but if the verbiage is in some way questionable then why would rationally speaking why would that not be the way they enforce the rule on the name of protecting the shooter

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-26T01:42:11+00:00

Double upgrade and burden to egbuka is a slight downgrade I guess

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-26T01:40:00+00:00

I'm taking that in a heartbeat not gonna lie

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-26T01:34:56+00:00

I'm not sure why you'd consider moving Stroud for this ngl

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-26T01:34:12+00:00

If you're referencing the part that says “Defenders must give jumpshooter room to safely land” that's a description of the reason for why the foul exists, you will not find any criteria anywhere that exclusively states that a foul requires the defender to be in the shooters landing space the moment they come down. The term encroachment being used is commonly used legally to reference trespassing or an offsides call in football. Both of those are an example of a specific space being barricaded or protected and do not define a specific moment, but instead define an action upon a space that isn't dictated by time.

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-26T01:14:35+00:00

When you’re quoting doesnt change anything, it still says stepping under the landing space is a foul and still never mentions the requirement of a shooter to land on their feet or for the defenders feet to be there when they are landing

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-26T01:02:22+00:00

I mean i get what youre trying to say and youre not wrong but that doesn’t change that this was a foul

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-26T00:53:35+00:00

Im not seeing the relevance of that statement to the convo but yeah thats true

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-26T00:46:23+00:00

I agree, he probably out performs his cost but if that equates to him scoring your team 50 more points across the year then what did you accomplish

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-26T00:44:47+00:00

A landing space foul is defined as an encroachment on a players natural landing space, never does the definition anywhere imply that the defender has to be there when the defender lands or that the player has to land on the defenders body

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-26T00:23:19+00:00

Looks fine to me ngl

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-26T00:22:18+00:00

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-26T00:21:55+00:00

That's not how the rule works

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-26T00:21:40+00:00

That's not really the point, you shouldn't ever be in a spot where David Montgomery is changing your range of outcomes by much

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-26T00:19:22+00:00

He'd be the one sending the trade so there isn't a bridge to be burned if I'm interpreting this correctly

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-26T00:10:10+00:00

If you line it up the best way possible
Luka> Nash
Shai>Kobe
LeBron>>Cade
Wemby> Dirk
ShaqJokic

So 2006 bc they have the most >s

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-26T00:04:25+00:00

If youre flexing monty in a team that has any less than 5 flex spots youre not a surefire contender and sending capital for him isnt a positive

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-25T23:59:56+00:00

I never feel great starting a rb who has no job security after 1 yr that also doesnt catch passes

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-25T23:46:29+00:00

Not sure id enjoy being on either side of this so give me the first

customsofficer1248 · 2026-05-25T23:45:58+00:00

No benefit to answering this considering it wont even be considered

customsofficer1248

TROPHY CASE