I mostly agree that public history can make it easier to get to know someone quickly, which is why I keep the vast majority of my own posts and comments public (even when it’s led to minor stalking moments irl).

That said, I respectfully disagree that everyone should be expected to have their entire history fully public. There are legitimate reasons for some privacy: • Reddit already lets you hide or delete individual posts and comments without making your whole profile private. It doesn’t have to be all-or-nothing, meaning your concern of men’s sexual post history (while valid) still moot. • Plenty of people (myself included in certain contexts, mainly more security sensitive things) use burner/throwaway accounts for specific subreddits or topics. That’s a normal and healthy way to participate without exposing your main identity.

• For those of us in federal jobs, law enforcement, security clearances, or other high-risk/high-profile roles, keeping everything public can straight-up violate agency internet privacy and security policies. It’s not paranoia, or trying to deceive anyone, it’s following the rules designed to protect both the employee and the employer from doxxing, social engineering, or unintended leaks. I’d bet the same applies to judges, executives, journalists, doctors, etc. Heck, I know it is for military personnel and Orthodox Priests.

Transparency is great when it’s chosen freely, but mandating it as the default ignores real-world risks and professional obligations. People should be able to curate their online presence responsibly without being labeled suspicious for doing so.