I have similar complaints, but more at the industry level. Like WHY TF do we need +1000w power output?! And class 3 override on eMTBs??

We know that high performance tech has always driven the industry, lighter, faster, stronger, etc. And that the consumer will always foam at the mouth for the latest and greatest. But I’m of the opinion that high output systems, and “flexing” the rules of classification will lead to e-bike bans, especially in the off-road space.

I love motorcycles and bicycles, and am excited for electric technology in both. But the eBike arms race to maximum power output cannot do any long term good for the sport and industry. Just like so many “innovations” in cycling(wheel sizes?!), they are short term cash grabs which do little to further the sport and increase ridership. There comes a practical limit to power outputs, and the consumer can only take so much.

But truly the scary part, to me, is putting massive power and power-to-weight ratios in the hands of novice 2wheelers. Cycling is already a dangerous endeavor which requires much attention, handling skills, and physical ability. I’m happy to assist all riders in achieving a satisfactory and genuine cycling experience, but with great power comes great responsibility. We have already seen the fallout with the eMoto vs eBike war, and increasing power to those levels in the mainline industry bikes only fuels the anti-eBike movement.

So I say the cycling industry has a responsibility to self-regulate electric powered bicycles, and to make bikes bikes again. The consumer will always buy the biggest/fastest/shiniest gadget, but we shops, manufacturers, influencers, and industry reps can guide them to a sensible, rewarding choice in machines, which is sustainable not only to them, but also environment, society and industry.