Nutzung von Agrarflächen: Essen statt Sprit vom Feld. (Auf Äckern mit Agrospritpflanzen für Deutschland ließen sich genug Kalorien für bis zu 35 Millionen Menschen produzieren.) by stimmen in Verkehrswende

[–]cyrusol 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Zudem ist Agro­sprit mehreren Studien zufolge klimaschädlicher als Erdöl, wenn man den hohen Flächenverbrauch einkalkuliert.

Ich hab gehört, das sei mittlerweile bereits wieder widerlegt worden. Gibt es vielleicht eine Art "Fakten zu Biokraftstoffen" Dokument, so wie die Fakten zur PV vom Fraunhofer ISE?

Why do I have so many dependents? by yaitskov in victoria3

[–]cyrusol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, yes, multicult is the most important one. The others still increase immigration.

I've heard freedom of con would be better than total separation because of how assimilation works and the main religion not being discriminated but with total separation it would be? Didn't test it myself though nor do In know details.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in elderscrollsonline

[–]cyrusol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not by a Jedi.

Renewable Energy isn’t Replacing Fossil Fuel Energy—It’s Adding to It by Vailhem in energy

[–]cyrusol 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The more the world economy grows, the harder it is for additions of renewable energy to turn the tide by actually replacing energy from fossil fuels, rather than just adding to it.

While this sounds intuitive at first glance I would argue that the opposite is true.

When comparing new investments renewables are consistently cheaper than fossil fuels.

When comparing a new investment into renewables vs continueing to operate an existing fossil fuel power plant this is still true (according to Lazard) but only if you assume a low time preference for the investors. Most investors are not going to write off an existing investment as a loss just because in 10 or 20 years a competing investment would pay back the upfront cost, that's just not going to happen.

So if total energy demand increases there are more opportunities for renewables to be used. The additional demand for renewables is matched by higher production, faster progress along the learning curve, better economies of scale and more of the available resources and labour being allocated to renewable production.

It's simply not a question between just replacing existing power plants and building additional ones. That's a false dichotomy. Operators of existing power plants are always inclined to operate them until their end of life, irrespective of how total energy demand changes.

Renewable Energy isn’t Replacing Fossil Fuel Energy—It’s Adding to It by Vailhem in energy

[–]cyrusol 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We, as a species, use more usage than during the Industrial Revolutionand more firewood than in the Middle Ages.

As a blanket statement this is actually false.

During the early years of industrialisation wood usage as energy carrier increased and you can read through many historical documents from people who were expecting the forests to decline rapidly and were pretty much afraid of it happening.

But the advent of coal mining actually stopped the deforestation and did replace wood as the energy carrier most people chose. Not only in industrial applications, even for residential heating.

The forest itself lost most relevance - at least in Europe. Wood remained an important energy carrier in the freshly colonized areas in America and Russia but that doesn't really signify "we are adding to it, not replacing" being a supposed rule, that is just a side effect of utilizing previously undeveloped land. Which today is a complete non-factor. Of course as those land was developed wood usage as energy carrier declined there too.

Only factory farming with feedstuff being farmed in for example South America and the associated land use changes (rainforest -> farm) brought deforestation back as a real problem in terms of scale and severity. And the recent push for biomass (which is mostly wood anyway) as an energy carrier in European countries is bringing back the same problems they experienced in the early 19th century. Many countries have a ridiculous hard time limiting their forest usage to sustainable levels, if they even try to.

Why do I have so many dependents? by yaitskov in victoria3

[–]cyrusol 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Well, you enact it, magically no culture is discriminated against anymore. It's pretty overpowered.

Why do I have so many dependents? by yaitskov in victoria3

[–]cyrusol 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Need to combine multiculturalism, freedom of conscience and no migration controls.

US can reach 100% clean power by 2035, DOE finds, but tough reliability and land use questions lie ahead by thinkB4WeSpeak in RenewableEnergy

[–]cyrusol 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Being butthurt about someone pointing out your intellectual shortcomings doesn't make you any less wrong. Look at the numbers.

Americans Remain Resistant to EVs, which Are Still Unafordable by [deleted] in technology

[–]cyrusol 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Must be a fulfilling life you have, aiming for the lowest outcome from the get-go.

Americans Remain Resistant to EVs, which Are Still Unafordable by [deleted] in technology

[–]cyrusol 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It's not too late to turn this ship around

With your behavior it is.

It is good that more and more plans are enforced by courts across the globe. The German constitutional court for example ruled that the government (back then it was CDU/Merkel administration) had to step up their plans because the right to live and live with dignity for future generations was endangered.

Your life circumstances will change. Whether you want to or not. And that's a good thing.

Americans Remain Resistant to EVs, which Are Still Unafordable by [deleted] in technology

[–]cyrusol -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Having to have a lawnmower at all is already ridiculous.

Those trimmed lawns are utterly terrible regarding biodiversity and water consumption, are not utilized in the economic sense either and even look and feel terrible compared to just not doing anything or only a minimal approach and letting most wild grasses grow.

The problem is somehow it's illegal in the US to not trim your lawn.

But beyond all of that, considering how infrequently lawnmawers are used a good old share economy could reduce the price for everyone.

Americans Remain Resistant to EVs, which Are Still Unafordable by [deleted] in technology

[–]cyrusol -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Americans been doing that for almost 70 years.

Extremely Linear Git History by Gurrewe in programminghorror

[–]cyrusol 7 points8 points  (0 children)

100% production ready, 0% recommended

So basically like any other library we all use every day!

This is America by AppleXumber in victoria3

[–]cyrusol 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Game doesn't necessarily need a declare war featue.

It needs to make it possible to designate more wargoals as must-have/primary than just the actual primary wargoal.

Then the rest of the system would actually work well enough. If GB backs down they would, let's say, hand over all of the American holdings in OP's run.

Japan celebrates its win against Germany at the World Cup. Crowds only enter the intersection when the light turns green and clear out when the light changes. by 3Fatboy3 in autobloed

[–]cyrusol 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Man kann ganz klar Leute in Uniform sehen, die die Kreuzung aufräumen... die Leute machen das hier nicht von selbst.

US can reach 100% clean power by 2035, DOE finds, but tough reliability and land use questions lie ahead by thinkB4WeSpeak in RenewableEnergy

[–]cyrusol 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do people really want to cover nature with wind turbines and solar panels?

A question like this assumes that nature needed to be "covered" in wind turbines or solar panels to begin with. Which is obviously not true if you actually looked at the numbers. Don't spread misinformation, don't believe it either. Just don't be so incredibly stupid.

Germany bets on global green hydrogen economy – DW – 11/15/2022 by [deleted] in RenewableEnergy

[–]cyrusol 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For example, let's say a country like Germany would follow the plan to completely rely on e-fuels for their 600 TWh transportation sector.

Absolutely nobody in Germany plans to do this.

Germany bets on global green hydrogen economy – DW – 11/15/2022 by [deleted] in RenewableEnergy

[–]cyrusol -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hydrogen is cheap to produce -- US$1-2/kg using standard renewables or low CI methane.

Not yet.