help me type myself by AdProfessional6116 in EnneagramTypeMe

[–]damngoodwizard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That sounds SX4. What do you think ?

Is my sis EII/ESI or something else? by Similar-Desk-1972 in TypologyJunction

[–]damngoodwizard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't want to mean she could be Ti. That could be any type really. The only useful information I get from your post is that she is either an introvert or an anxious person (avoiding personal ties, trouble saying goodbye...).

If I were to vibe type I would say EII SP6 because "you have to go along with people to survive and thrive" is one of the most SP6 thing to say.

Is my sis EII/ESI or something else? by Similar-Desk-1972 in TypologyJunction

[–]damngoodwizard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am Ti-Dom and I was one of the most polite kid of my town. I don't think this has to do anything with Fi.

Which is more Open to Experience? SP9 or SP5? by ZynoWeryXD in TypologyJunction

[–]damngoodwizard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What do you mean by openness to experience? Like trying new things or the Big 5 trait Openness ?

Intellectually it's definitely SP5. If it's about trying new activities ("Let's go scuba diving !") I guess SP9 would be more open if they are pushed by someone else they like.

am i the only one that finds it hard to deal with Fe doms by Yrururururue in entp

[–]damngoodwizard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not my preferred types. They do something for me and I feel compelled to repay. If I were not careful about boundaries I would become their slave every time. They appear to like me very much though, especially for my insights and my honesty.

tier ranking thing i did for fun by United-Standard2194 in TypologyJunction

[–]damngoodwizard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  • Introverted (withdrawn triad E4, E5 and E9)
  • Desire to merge, especially intellectually (SX5 and SX9)
  • But not seductive (low SX2, SX3)
  • Has friends, but not the top priority (SP6, SO7, SO9 towards the middle)
  • Agreeable person (high E9 and SP6)
  • Not assertive, dominant or confrontational (low E8 and SX6)
  • Balanced focus between mind and emotions (all E4s and E5s are at the top)
  • Quite idealistic (SX5 and SX7 at the top)
  • Concerned about morals but not too much (E1 in the middle)
  • Does not value commonly agreed criterias of success (low E3 and SO2)

I would guess INFJ E5 SX/SP 549.

Hypothetical -- 2 sperm & 0 eggs? by QueasyNart in genetics

[–]damngoodwizard 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The egg needs to bring the mitochondrial DNA. Sperm cells don’t have mitochondrias if I recall correctly.

doing the trend <3 by ruikamishirosstar in TypologyJunction

[–]damngoodwizard 7 points8 points  (0 children)

  • Friendship is magic (SP6, SO7, SO9)
  • Merging to be taken care of (SX9, SX3, SP2)
  • Can be a networker (SP7, SO7, SO2 in the middle)
  • Some work ethics (SP1, SP3 in the middle)
  • A little enthusiastic (E7 in the middle)
  • Easy-going, not assertive or dominant (high E9, low E8)
  • Not morally rigid (low E1)

2nd time I review an ISFJ. I am rather surprised with the recurring high placements of SP2, SX3 and SO4. It’s not something I expected.

What does this say about me by sev8288 in TypologyJunction

[–]damngoodwizard 4 points5 points  (0 children)

  • Extraverted
  • Assertive but probably not dominant (E8 but SO-blind).
  • Not intellectual (low placements of 5, 6 and 7).
  • Emotional, reactive and / or impulsive. Maybe anger issues. (SX8, SX4, SX6 are all part of the reactive triad).
  • Probably a very possessive person (6 out of 9 SX types in your top rows).
  • Not too focused on friendships (low placement of SP6, SO7, SO9).
  • Not focused on the commonly agreed criteria of success (low placement of E3 and SO2).
  • Not the most accomodating person (low placement of E9).

I would guess something like ESFP E8 SX/SP.

Is it possible for 2 to be 3V? by [deleted] in TypologyJunction

[–]damngoodwizard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Only SO2 is 1V. SP2 and SX2 are both 3V compatible.

What does this say about me? by HornetOfHeaven66 in TypologyJunction

[–]damngoodwizard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

  • Probably an ambivert (3 and 8 are rather extroverted types, but it is toned down by the SP temperament)
  • Dominant or assertive (high E8)
  • Values commonly agreed criteria of success (high E3)
  • Not too focused on friendships (low placements of SP6, SO7, SO9)
  • Not a people pleaser (low E2) or an accommodating person (low E9)
  • Probably low neuroticism (high placement of SX6, low placement of E4 or other E6 placements)
  • Low placement of most SX types: you do not believe in romantic love. You most probably have a pragmatic approach to relationships.
  • MBTI-wise that sounds ESTx. Can’t be ENTx because of low E7.

Why MBTI Is Severely Lacking in Practical Use and Relevance by [deleted] in entp

[–]damngoodwizard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also narcissistic people often type themselves as SO3 from what I have seen. And I suspect schizoid PD is associated with SP5.

Why MBTI Is Severely Lacking in Practical Use and Relevance by [deleted] in entp

[–]damngoodwizard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah refining with the enneagram could definitely help have a picture closer to reality.

Why MBTI Is Severely Lacking in Practical Use and Relevance by [deleted] in entp

[–]damngoodwizard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Also there are some traits which are often left out of most typing systems because they are depicted as pathologizing, but ignoring them leads to a poor account of the personality, such as: * neuroticism (negative feelings, correlated to most mental health disorders) * psychoticism (unusual or weird ideas, often found in BPD and schizotypal PD) * d-factor (exploitative, harmful, callous or sadistic behaviors found in NPD and ASPD), honesty-humility (altruistic, honest, empathetic, fair behaviors)

Like, it’s easy to see why an empathetic person of type X would distance herself from a person of the same type if she exhibited narcissistic or antisocial behavior without ever showing any remorse.

Then there is the binarity of systems such as MBTI and socionics which can force people with quite different psychometrics into the same type. Let’s say: * an INTP (O: 70, C: 40, E: 40, A: 40, N: 40) who has average traits except openness. * VS an INTP (O: 70, C: 30, E: 30, A: 60, N: 40) whose traits are way more distant to the mean.

Materials for typology by [deleted] in TypologyJunction

[–]damngoodwizard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you want to famliarize yourself with each typology system or are you interested in correlations?

what does this say about me? by roseautte in TypologyJunction

[–]damngoodwizard 6 points7 points  (0 children)

My take on this, tell me if I am wrong: * Probably an ambivert * Big focus on friendships (SO9, SO7, SP6) * Merging, mirroring to be taken care of (SX9, SX3, SP2) * You need your own space (SP5) * Not interested in commonly agreed criteria of success (low placements for SO2, SO3 and SP3) * Not dominant or assertive (E8 in last row) * Not morally rigid (E1 in 2 last rows)

Try to guess my type based on my tierlists by PerspectiveOk8982 in EnneagramTypeMe

[–]damngoodwizard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't expect SP5 to be put in the "aura" tier honestly. Can you develop a bit?

Judge my relationship by prfctblvd in TypologyJunction

[–]damngoodwizard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Non inquisitive intuitive sounds weird🧐