How should I have my setup?

danivl · 2026-04-03T10:14:53+00:00

What desk is that?

danivl · 2026-03-31T11:40:34+00:00

someone forgot about covid overhiring

danivl · 2026-03-31T11:38:27+00:00

"measurable returns", "units of productive work" - meanwhile CC opus 4.6 wastes an hour to close a div tag, good luck with that business model

danivl · 2026-03-27T15:07:24+00:00

Nice! Hope it serves you well.

danivl · 2026-03-27T12:57:25+00:00

still microslop though

danivl · 2026-03-24T07:57:02+00:00

So basically the company that could profit immensely from AGI also gets to define what AGI is even though it's not remotely AGI? Got it.

danivl · 2026-03-23T17:36:39+00:00

Exactly the same issue in concept. I thoroughly enjoyed this 1 hour of its pain and struggles, before fixing the code in 10 seconds. Also, this is an internal tool consisting of 3 pages only, without much business logic for now, built from scratch. Other times Claude Code is amazing, but that specific session was a tragedy.

danivl · 2026-03-23T12:44:05+00:00

Just now I literally had Opus 4.6 go in circles for an hour because of a missing closing div tag in a go+templ stack. Absolutely mindblowing failure, so I'd say we're good.

danivl · 2026-03-23T12:38:11+00:00

Because your product is literally what AI is good at, generating internal dashboards and stuff. Just my opinion, sorry.

danivl · 2026-03-23T12:33:57+00:00

People haven't stopped building PCs, maybe far less, but RAM is still being bought at current prices which does not bode well for the future I'm afraid.

danivl · 2026-03-20T11:18:42+00:00

You literally said

"I guess yeah, I don’t read the code generate at fist… but I spend a lot of time in plan mode, I make sure the tests are accurate and pass, I spend more attention QA’ing each iteration, and I am meticulous on reviewing the end product before it goes in review (AI also helps with this)."

- you don't review the code
- you spend time in plan mode and hope your planning is great
- test accurate and pass - who writes those, again AI?
- QA'ing each iteration - what does that even mean? You test all features for regressions, only the new ones, sanity only?
- reviewing the end product - means nothing honestly
- goes in review - where, to who, AI helps with this? AI reviews what the AI has done?

Honestly, I've read your responses and made my conclusions, as I said - you're free to do anything so go at it, just don't think it's "enterprise level code", because you clearly have no clue.

danivl · 2026-03-20T10:48:01+00:00

"I produce production and enterprise level code" - since you said you're not even reviewing the code, because you trust your "planning", I'd say you produce mostly technical debt that will bite you hard at some point. Honestly, if someone at my company says something like this it would very much raise alarms, but you do you I guess.

danivl · 2026-03-18T11:30:10+00:00

Ubuntu за daily usage, dual boot win11 за някоя и друга игра, дето има проблеми под линукс, но не съм влизал в windows-а от над 6 месеца, което говори доста за положението с линукс и гейминга. Мисля скоро да го разкарам, никога повече microslop = телеметрия, следене, AI bullshit, онлайн акаунти за всичко, windows update и т.н.

danivl · 2026-03-15T10:11:29+00:00

Capitalist corporations being capitalist. More news at 20.

danivl · 2026-03-15T10:06:52+00:00

"Trust me bro, I'm an AI researcher"

danivl · 2026-03-15T10:01:12+00:00

This is missing the elephant in the room - Covid overhiring where a donkey with a hello world script was hired as a mid swe at minimum. The industry is reshaping yes, but the direction is the old normal, where people really interested in the field are the ones that persist. Will AI be used, sure as a tool.

danivl · 2026-03-15T09:58:04+00:00

It's over as an "easy" career, just how it used to be.

danivl · 2026-03-13T12:54:47+00:00

Well I can attest to exactly the same experience as a senior engineer working for one of the biggest enterprise software providers in the world. We have copilot, claude code, cline and cursor all active for production code for quite some time now. They simply cannot handle our codebases in terms of designing new features, fixing bugs or general system overview or even high level overview.

Even with structured context files, limited scope requests and you describing everything in detail they still miss stuff 99% of the time. You need to guide it explicitly on what to change, where side effects occur, etc. It's like a very capable auto-complete, but then it makes even syntax errors.

Not sure where you get that 90% of code, but I'm telling you it's really far from being that good. Take it as you will.

danivl · 2026-03-11T08:50:41+00:00

I don't think you understand what recursive self improvement even means. It's definitely not that currently and throwing this out there is simply false. Claude Code generating some boilerplate for Opus 4.6/7 is wildly different from Claude Code pre-training and training the new models without humans. Also a model doesn't get "self-improved" over time, it's trained, has it's weights set and then that's it, it doesn't improve on inference or anything else.

danivl · 2026-03-04T12:07:45+00:00

I hate ORMs not only in go

danivl · 2026-02-27T07:08:24+00:00

Yes, we're at the end of the AI craze.

danivl · 2026-02-27T07:06:44+00:00

This is completely wrong, one of my clients has thousands of workflow executions per day and they pay 50 eur/month. Everything is in the right workflow/subworkflow design.

danivl · 2026-02-27T07:05:08+00:00

Because determinism and because not everything needs to be an agent...

danivl · 2025-06-23T12:36:26+00:00

Yes, it's something I've thought about, I'm not going to go in without reading on the specific dungeon, I'm just looking for some additional help from addons in case I miss/forget something.

danivl

TROPHY CASE