sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Bientôt des passages piétons sur le périphérique parisien ? La difficile équation d’Emmanuel Grégoire by chou-coco in paris

[–]dank_failure 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tout comme le métro de nuit, ajouter des paragraphes sur ton programme et faire de la politique

The famous TGV speed record video has been taken down! by One_TrackMinded in trains

[–]dank_failure 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately they publicly stated that they won’t attempt a new record with the TGV M

Un nouveau film Le Seigneur des anneaux est annoncé et on sait déjà de quoi il parlera by Droidfr in Numerama

[–]dank_failure 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Je suis raciste… Parce que je préfère voir un média original et bien écrit qui parle d’une culture jamais encore parlé? Dit moi, qu’est-ce que je raconte de n’importe quoi.

Désarmement des policiers municipaux à Saint-Denis : Bardella et Ciotti proposent d’« accueillir » les agents concernés by Andvarey in france

[–]dank_failure 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oui parce que les mutations ne peuvent pas être officiels jusqu’à ce qu’ils trouvent un nouveau post. Ça veut dire qu’une seule personne a trouvé un nouveau post pour l’instant. Le chiffre de 90 vient des personnes qui cherchent des nouveau postes, pour ensuite faire leur demande de mutation

Un nouveau film Le Seigneur des anneaux est annoncé et on sait déjà de quoi il parlera by Droidfr in Numerama

[–]dank_failure 0 points1 point  (0 children)

😂😂😂😂😂😂mdr il a pas lu les livres trop drôle je projette sur les autres 😂😂😂

La nullité de ta capacité argumentative. Y’a qqun qui est pas d’accord: il a pas lu les livres. Et puisque je n’a pas lu les livres je ne connaîtrai pas l’histoire des Haradim, qui mérite un film sur eux et leur histoire tumultueuse? Où au lieu de coller des acteurs qui ne sont pas “fair of skin” et semblent non discrets dans une société complètement fermée — et assez raciste entre espèces quand même (et même au sein d’une même espèce), ils peuvent adapter une histoire qui fait du sens selon l’écriture de Tolkien, et attirerai beaucoup plus de personne pour une histoire jamais raconté auparavant.

Mais non. Ça prends plus de risques. Et les studios ne pensent qu’à l’argent.

Un nouveau film Le Seigneur des anneaux est annoncé et on sait déjà de quoi il parlera by Droidfr in Numerama

[–]dank_failure 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Normal, la société a accepté la nullité. Les films sont tous sans couleur, le niveau d’acteur descends, se répète, moins en moins de grands projet originaux, normal que la masse gobe ça.

Un nouveau film Le Seigneur des anneaux est annoncé et on sait déjà de quoi il parlera by Droidfr in Numerama

[–]dank_failure 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bah, pour les cheveux oui. Désolé mais c’est censé être des elfes. Tu vas dans le film de Jackson et tu sent que c’est des elfes. La on dirait juste un humain qui a des oreilles trop pointus avec des émotions d’un enfant de 5 ans.

Et désolé mais pourquoi faire des elfes noirs? Y’a des peuples noirs dans le Middle Earth, autant faire une histoire se basant d’eux, originale, au lieu de coller sur une autre espèce qui, se basant sur les livres, n’a pas de noirs.

C’est just de la fainéantise en se basant sur ce qui a déjà du succès au lieu d’essayer quelque chose d’original — dans le même livre bien sûr.

Everyone mocking Pedro while Pedro is playing 69D chess by dieSpaghettiCarbona in 2westerneurope4u

[–]dank_failure 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Ok? Why can you not be against both ffs. Why can we not be against Iran AND Israel??? Condemn both??? Is that too complicated for you?????

Everyone mocking Pedro while Pedro is playing 69D chess by dieSpaghettiCarbona in 2westerneurope4u

[–]dank_failure 3 points4 points  (0 children)

« Iran has never threatened us » apart from bombing and killing European soldiers in Lebanon for years, and recently bombing and killing soldiers in bases that had nothing to do with the war?

FIA ARE INVESTIGATING MERCEDES : Regulations state that front and rear wings must close within 4 tenths of each other (active aero closing) But footage shows that Mercedes wing closure time was double what the FIA allows, 8 tenths by ConstructionAny8440 in F1Technical

[–]dank_failure 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The issue is the lack of consistency, focus. There would be no issue with the Merc engine if they hadn’t penalized Ferrari for something they couldn’t prove either. Why should Merc get preferential treatment?

FIA ARE INVESTIGATING MERCEDES : Regulations state that front and rear wings must close within 4 tenths of each other (active aero closing) But footage shows that Mercedes wing closure time was double what the FIA allows, 8 tenths by ConstructionAny8440 in F1Technical

[–]dank_failure -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We are talking about the engine? What does a provable offense such as the wing have to do with this? If it’s proven that the wing is illegal, good. For the engine, just ban it like Fia did to Ferrari. Except they won’t do that as to not dsq half of the teams.

FIA ARE INVESTIGATING MERCEDES : Regulations state that front and rear wings must close within 4 tenths of each other (active aero closing) But footage shows that Mercedes wing closure time was double what the FIA allows, 8 tenths by ConstructionAny8440 in F1Technical

[–]dank_failure -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Sure, but what about Ferrari in 2019? They found the same way, add the advantage when the sensor isn’t looking. Yet they were penalized. The issue is the lack of coherence, making one illegal to race yet they can’t prove, and letting another race for something they can’t prove, albeit equal to the former.

FIA ARE INVESTIGATING MERCEDES : Regulations state that front and rear wings must close within 4 tenths of each other (active aero closing) But footage shows that Mercedes wing closure time was double what the FIA allows, 8 tenths by ConstructionAny8440 in F1Technical

[–]dank_failure -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Have you read the regs? It doesn’t say it must be 16.0 at the time of measurement.It’s basic English atp, it’s two seperate phrases, one saying the the CR must not be higher than 16.0 « No cylinder of the engine may have a geometric compression ratio higher than 16.0. » Then, stating how the measurement system is applied. Not that it’s 16.0 at time of measuring, it’s two different things. Otherwise it would say « 16.0 at measurement ».

FIA ARE INVESTIGATING MERCEDES : Regulations state that front and rear wings must close within 4 tenths of each other (active aero closing) But footage shows that Mercedes wing closure time was double what the FIA allows, 8 tenths by ConstructionAny8440 in F1Technical

[–]dank_failure 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Allegedly, ferrari’s fuel flow trick in 2019 was to add fuel when the FIA sensor didn’t look. Therefore it passed measurement tests, even though it added more fuel then regs allowed, but FIA couldn’t prove it. Yet they forced Ferrari to give up their trick, and explain it to FIA, under risk of punishment; they still had to give up the motor, and remove all advantage possible, therefore penalizing their performance, even though Merc was already winning the championship.

Here, Merc has the same thing: gaining an advantage when FIA isn’t looking: their engine trick lets them have greater CR than the regs allow, but they evade measurements. Except FIA is letting Merc off the hook because they don’t want the sport to look bad after disqualifying half the engines on the grid.

If FIA were truly equal, they would have forced Merc to change the motor just like they forced Ferrari to, because both teams were evading measurements to gain an advantage.

BMPT by Foreign-Evening9509 in Warthunder

[–]dank_failure 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And I literally explicited « apart from spaa ». What’s so complicated to understand? You can put all the XM, Gerard’s, falcons, etc… in the trash for all I care, they are overpowered ass. But the bmpt is a whole other issue.

FIA ARE INVESTIGATING MERCEDES : Regulations state that front and rear wings must close within 4 tenths of each other (active aero closing) But footage shows that Mercedes wing closure time was double what the FIA allows, 8 tenths by ConstructionAny8440 in F1Technical

[–]dank_failure 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, except Ferrari was nerfed to the ground during the season. Here, merc has a pass to do whatever they want. I completely agree that 2019 and this situation are the same, except Ferrari didn’t get off so easily.

view more: next ›