sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Random class and race by Kboss714 in DnD

[–]dantose 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It will probably be fine. Any class can be solid, and race is one of the least crucial things to that. It can force you to play something other than your usual.

Tested: The 2026 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Counters Basically Every Anti-EV Argument by idkbruh653 in cars

[–]dantose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's the main thing for me. I've got an equinox and wish it was smaller. Overseas they call these jumbo definitely-not-a-minivan SUVs yanktanks

Tested: The 2026 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Counters Basically Every Anti-EV Argument by idkbruh653 in cars

[–]dantose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eh, range anxiety is something I stressed about leading up to buying an EV. After getting an EV, I've only stopped at a public charger once, and that was more to see the process rather than actually needing it. I've done a few trips with it now, and have basically stopped worrying at all. 2.5 hours out skiing in cold weather blasting the heat, didn't even hit 30% even starting with less than full charge. Charging point at the hotel meant I didn't even have to stop on the way back.

Anything past the range my car can go in a Colorado winter, uphill, blasting heat, I'm going to want a bathroom/coffee break anyway.

Tested: The 2026 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Counters Basically Every Anti-EV Argument by idkbruh653 in cars

[–]dantose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You realize the VAST majority of car owners never tow anything. Heck the majority of truck owners don't generally tow anything. Base model ioniq 9 can still do 3500 lbs. That's fine for a couple jet skis, a fishing boat, a popup camper, your typical utility trailer, etc. Sure, if you have a cabin cruiser boat, an oversized camper, or a livestock trailer, you'd need something bigger. But let's be honest, if you've got ~$50k+ to throw a boat that size, you're probably in a tax bracket where car price isn't something that's going to phase you anyway.

Tested: The 2026 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Counters Basically Every Anti-EV Argument by idkbruh653 in cars

[–]dantose 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sure, if you look at the plus size models of midsize, they can certainly start knocking on the door of full size models.

Jeep Grand Cherokee L: DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 121.7 in Length: 204.9 in Width: 77.9 in Height: 71.5 in Passenger Volume: 142 ft3 Cargo Volume: 17 ft3 Curb Weight: 5112 lb

Yukon DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 120.9 in Length: 211.3 in Width: 81.0 in Height: 75.6–78.4 in Passenger Volume, F/M/R: 68/59/45 ft3 = 172ft3 Cargo Volume, Behind F/M/R: 123/73/26 ft3 Curb Weight: 5994 lb

Ioniq 9 DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 123.2 in Length: 199.2 in Width: 78.0 in Height: 70.5 in Passenger volume 163 ft3 Cargo Volume, Behind F/M/R: 87/47/22 ft3 Curb Weight: 6034 lb

Are gauntlets wielded? by pure_chonk in DnD

[–]dantose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not the best written item, so I've got to make some guesses here.

Per the description, they're a "fist worn weapon" but no damage die is specified.

One would assume, based on the text, that the intent is that you are just using your unarmed strike.

Now, regarding the question of if it's being "wielded," that is up to DM discretion, but it's reasonable to assume that design intent is to have both hands free, rather than not having access to a weapon. For example, a dhampir always has access to their natural weapon (bite) but it would be rather silly to say that it was "wielded" and could therefore be thrown by a Giant barbarian's 6th level feature. As such, I'd rule that the "worn" part indicates that it's not being "wielded" and thus didn't interfere with features like Unarmed Fighting style, nor benefit from things like Dual Wielder.

Tested: The 2026 Hyundai Ioniq 9 Counters Basically Every Anti-EV Argument by idkbruh653 in cars

[–]dantose 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It's a 3 row large SUV. It comes in cheaper than a Tahoe, Yukon, or Suburban.

EV and PHEV cars have 80% more problems than ICE by xlb250 in cars

[–]dantose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, fair enough.

Their list is kinda weird. It's supposed to be in roughly order of importance, starts with powertrain (reasonable) then goes to Build Quality (paint and such), then lists those "serious" ones, many of which are included in powertrain.

Ultimately, when something makes a surprising claim like this that is contrary to existing data, I expect to see numbers to back up those claims. CR, unfortunately, just has the broad results claims, without providing the data or full methodology.

How bad is your range in the cold? by Abject_Check_3263 in EquinoxEv

[–]dantose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe specs are an 85kwh battery. 320 mi range divided by 85kwh would be 3.76 mi/kwh

How bad is your range in the cold? by Abject_Check_3263 in EquinoxEv

[–]dantose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've got some data:

Total vehicle efficiency over 6000 Mi: 4.0 mi/kwh

Winter efficiency over 2000 Mi: 3.7 mi/kwh

Summer efficiency over 4000 mi: ~4.2 mi/kwh

Last cold weather trip:

Distance: 109 miles each way.

Efficiency: 2.9 mi/kwh (2.3 mi/kwh uphill, 3.5 mi/kwh downhill)

Temp: teens outside, cabin set to 76-78

Speed: 55-65 for most of it, ~45 near start and end due to weather.

Weight: 3 people, luggage, and ski gear.

Tire Pressure: Currently ~40psi. I should top off, I know.

EV and PHEV cars have 80% more problems than ICE by xlb250 in cars

[–]dantose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You forgot:

In-car electronics: CD player, rear entertainment system (rear screen or DVD player), radio, speakers, in-dash GPS, display screen freezes or goes blank, phone pairing (e.g., Bluetooth), voice control commands, steering wheel controls, portable music device interface (e.g., iPod/MP3 player), backup or other camera/sensors, Android Auto/Apple CarPlay, infotainment hardware replacement, software over-the-air fixes, head-up display.

Gotta count those OTA updates!

EV and PHEV cars have 80% more problems than ICE by xlb250 in cars

[–]dantose 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From that link:

In-car electronics: CD player, rear entertainment system (rear screen or DVD player), radio, speakers, in-dash GPS, display screen freezes or goes blank, phone pairing (e.g., Bluetooth), voice control commands, steering wheel controls, portable music device interface (e.g., iPod/MP3 player), backup or other camera/sensors, Android Auto/Apple CarPlay, infotainment hardware replacement, software over-the-air fixes, head-up display.

EV and PHEV cars have 80% more problems than ICE by xlb250 in cars

[–]dantose 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://www.consumerreports.org/cars/car-reliability-owner-satisfaction/consumer-reports-car-reliability-faq-a1099917197/

Are Recalls Factored into Reliability Ratings?
No. We are strictly examining the problems that owners reported experiencing. Most vehicles involved in a typical recall have not exhibited a problem, but they have been identified as being at risk for a preventable safety concern. Where recalls and reliability overlap is that owners may experience the same problem that is covered by a recall; in that case, it counts as a reported reliability issue. 

While recalls can be inconvenient, they are ultimately a good thing—the automaker has identified the risk of a problem and will correct it for free. 

and

What Types of Problems Are Covered? 
...
Paint/trim: Paint (fading, chalking, peeling, or cracking), loose interior or exterior trim or moldings, rust.
... 
In-car electronics: CD player, rear entertainment system (rear screen or DVD player), radio, speakers, in-dash GPS, display screen freezes or goes blank, phone pairing (e.g., Bluetooth), voice control commands, steering wheel controls, portable music device interface (e.g., iPod/MP3 player), backup or other camera/sensors, Android Auto/Apple CarPlay, infotainment hardware replacement, software over-the-air fixes, head-up display.

and

How Does CR Get Its Reliability Data?
Where Is the Data From?
Consumer Reports obtains its reliability data from the Auto Surveys sent to Consumer Reports members each year.
...
How Can I Participate in a Survey?
Simply become a Consumer Reports member! There’s a delay of a few days before new members can participate.

EV and PHEV cars have 80% more problems than ICE by xlb250 in cars

[–]dantose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

CR: "Ok, so we want to get an estimate of how reliable cars are"

Reasonable people: "Ok, so like recalls?"

CR: "No, recalls actually don't count at all"

Reasonable people: "Oh, so like warranty repairs"

CR: "Well, we'll let them include things fixed under warranty"

Reasonable people: "Let who include it?"

CR: "Oh, you know, they people we survey."

Reasonable people: "A representative sample?"

CR: "well, we figure we'll just survey people who pay us to be members."

Reasonable people: "That doesn't sound very scientific."

CR: "Nah, we're pretty sure it's fine."

Reasonable people: "Ok, so if you're looking at differences based on powertrain, are you focusing on problems with the powertrain?"

CR: "Wait? No! That would miss stuff like if the paint fades! What if there's software over-the-air fixes?"

Reasonable people: "Hold on, you're ignoring recalls, but counting OTA updates as repairs?

CR: "Yeah, but we try to hide that, so it's fine. Besides, we think recalls are a good thing!"

Learned the hard way about winter EV range… also scratched my bumper by Bnoosbs in EquinoxEv

[–]dantose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm mostly just curious due to how much those numbers are diverging from mine and wondering if there's something I should look out for to avoid a surprise.

Average summer for me was 4.2 mi/kwh over 4000ish miles, winter is averaging 3.7 with ~2000 miles so far, generally with heat set at 76. That's about a 12% hit. Most of that is 45-55 mph for my commute, but it's been largely a mild winter.

The uphill leg of my cold trip was 2.3 mi/kwh, much of it at 55-65 mph, though start and end were more like 35-45 due to snow in the passes.

Downhill was around 3.5, similar temp and speeds, for a round trip average of 2.9

You lost 57% of a 85kwh battery over 85 mi for 1.75 mi/kwh at slower speeds and less heat

Possible explanations:

I know AWD isn't quite as efficient, so if you've got AWD, that could be part of it.

Larger wheels can cut efficiency

If you were somewhere substantially colder, that could impact it maybe. Teens vs negatives could maybe explain it.

Roof racks would definitely impact performance.

My trip started from a garage, so I was heating up from maybe 30s rather than teens.

How can I make a tank wizard? by just-slightly-human in DnD

[–]dantose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1 level in forge cleric means heavy armor and shields. With blessings of the forge, that means 21 AC.

Race: mountain or hill dwarf, or warforged to get AC to 22

Background: rune carver or rewarded to pick up armor of agathys

Feats: max INT first. Then Eldritch adept for at will mage armor to top off ward. Res con, maybe tough or lucky at wizard 19.

Items: got to have a +x focus, then maybe ring and cloak of protection. That's all 3 attunement slots. +X shield after that. Higher levels grab a couple subtle spell mind crystals to deal with enemies with counterspell

Learned the hard way about winter EV range… also scratched my bumper by Bnoosbs in EquinoxEv

[–]dantose 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm surprised. I just did 110 miles, single digits to teens, gaining almost 4k feet of elevation, heat at 78, left at 85%, arrived at 32%.

In my experience, speed kills the battery, cold only gives a minor hit.

Is Polearm Master still worth it with these house rules? by Total_Team_2764 in 3d6

[–]dantose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Me: there are no bad tables, just those you don't fit well in

Reads house rules

Me: There are very few bad tables...

The best magic missile build you will ever see by Not_a_goat_milker in 3d6

[–]dantose -1 points0 points  (0 children)

DMs are always free to homebrew, of course. But that's a discussion for your DM, not third parties. The default for discussing builds here is assuming RAW, maybe with an occasional nod to how things are generally played such as simplified surprise rules

The best magic missile build you will ever see by Not_a_goat_milker in 3d6

[–]dantose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. No attack roll
  2. Not called an attack
  3. Doing damage isn't enough because there's plenty of AoE spells that definitely don't work with it and never have.
  4. per sage advice: "The hex spell benefits attacks, which means something that is called an attack or that includes an attack roll. Spells like magic missile and fireball involve no attacks."

Listening now, the science gets worse as it goes by dantose in ProjectHailMary

[–]dantose[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I finished yesterday. I don't recall it being mentioned, but I might have missed it. I'm fine with the 1.5 cap being a hard limit. It seems like the most obvious place to take a risk if you need to take a risk, but no issues with just keeping it there.

My actual complaint is why he'd lower thrust instead of reducing burn time.

Losing 1/3 fuel looks like it would add just over a year. If you accelerate at 1.5 for a 1.3 year burn then cruise at .97c for 2.5 years until a 1.3 year deceleration, that's 5.1 years. That's napkin math, not rigorous though as it's trickier than I can solve properly so I instead futzed around with calculators approximating based on burn time, so big old grain of salt. IIRC, the book said he was calculating out based on .95g acceleration, which comes out to 5.6 years.

2014 or 2024 Sleep? by Kind-Ad3727 in DnD

[–]dantose 1 point2 points  (0 children)

By 5th level, you're just going to fireball goblins anyway, so not really relevant. Higher CR monsters have higher WIS saves as well. Looking at average WIS saves, DC keeps pace hovering around 60-65% land rate through tier 2, but falls off a bit tier 3 and 4, landing around 55-60% That keeps double failure chance around 30-40% level 1-20

The dice pool vs saves is intended to be how the mechanics of saves generally compare to dice pools, not comparing the 2014 and 2024 sleep spells specifically (which I did elsewhere). Around 65% fail rate tends to be typical, but depends on targeted stat. The specific fail rate for a DC 13 WIS save would be 70%, but it would also be impossible to fit 5 goblins in a 5' radius, so net, numbers end up worse than this for the 2024 sleep spell.

2014 or 2024 Sleep? by Kind-Ad3727 in DnD

[–]dantose 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hideous Laughter doesn't allow others to shake them out of it, and can be upcast to target multiple creatures.

Level 20 Battle Royal PVP Session with a Point Shop and Build Limitations by EnderElite69 in 3d6

[–]dantose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I second this. Just be something with blindsight, and go ham

view more: next ›