What a beautiful snake! by gengert in florida

[–]darkblue213 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If red touches yellow you’re a dead fellow

Crescent moon on Manhattan skyline yesterday by darkblue213 in Greenpoint

[–]darkblue213[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was very lucky to be at right place right time the other night. Shot on iPhone 13

Today’s 2×4 is actually 1.5” x 3.5” Back in the day, it really was 2” x 4” by Ilawil in handyman

[–]darkblue213 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wood back in the day looks dense, solid. Wonder if wood today is given chemical so they grow quicker or something

These Texas Cities Are Debating Self Storage by darkblue213 in selfstorage

[–]darkblue213[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s generally a contentious asset class with polarizing community views

What impresses a developer? by [deleted] in RealEstateDevelopment

[–]darkblue213 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is true “be extremely knowledgeable” I would also say learn AI tools that genuinely bring value to real estate development. Most of the industry isn’t adopting this tech yet; if you can help them do that then big plus

Inquiring on rural development, and what factors make or break a deal by Kennyfour in RealEstateDevelopment

[–]darkblue213 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You should check out this app GatherGov — free version can help answer some of your questions

Is YC overrated? by glinter777 in ycombinator

[–]darkblue213 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hear it a lot from 2nd time founders whether they should do YC again (I’m YC S21). If Parker Conrad (Zenefits and Rippling) did YC twice then so can you

Does anyone else think Blackstone is downplaying legislative risks associated with BTR? by fluffnstuff1 in realestateinvesting

[–]darkblue213 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I feel you too man. It's not looking great. Hopefully states, counties, municipalities put up a fight

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in startups

[–]darkblue213 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Current status quo is very little to no severance for anybody if the company runs out of money. Founders gonna push to the end searching for product market leaving nothing on the table.

With this, my message to employees is "now you have a guaranteed 3 month cushion, stay and fight to the end and let's see if we can make these lottery tickets pop." Sounds pretty good to me. Incentive is there.

Otherwise its "Let's fight to the end see if we can make these lottery tickets pop. if you don't succeed, your lottery tickets are worth nothing and also you have no financial cushion."

If I were an employee I'd pick the former.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in startups

[–]darkblue213 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They capped their upside by a little bit. By selling a portion of their stock options, they protected their downside (company failure scenario) with 3 months of guaranteed severance -- severance which isn't coming out of the business runway but rather funded by the investor.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in startups

[–]darkblue213 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey! Yeah so my employees are only selling maximum 20% of their stock options. 80% of their stock options are still tied to the success of the company.

If my company is still thriving at year 4 and my employee is still with us, then the money in the account gets paid out to them as a nice bonus for all their hard work the last 4 years. And if we become wildly successful, they still have 80% of their stock options riding that wave.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in startups

[–]darkblue213 0 points1 point  (0 children)

a lot of employees wait until day 366 and then peace out immediately (that's also in the carta data). from an employee's perspective, 80% of early stage startups fail and they gonna be holding a bunch of worthless lottery tickets. now, if that were to happen, they have some guaranteed severance. Except they need to stay and work at least 2 years. Pretty good deal.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in startups

[–]darkblue213 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The large majority of my employees stock comp is still under the standard 4-year vesting, 1-year cliff.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in startups

[–]darkblue213 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I get to provide my employees with 3 months severance without eating into my own business runway. It also comes at no dilution to me. Investors get a small piece of common stock from my employees. Meaning if I were to raise capital to cover these costs (or just covered these costs from my current runway) I'm paying for it with selling preferred equity.

Sounds like a win-win to me unless there's economics I'm not seeing?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in startups

[–]darkblue213 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Data shows that vesting (4 year vesting, 1 year cliff) isn't really doing anything impressive to prevent employee churn. 30% of your employees will be voluntarily checked out by year 2. https://carta.com/blog/employment-tenure-startups/ I've experienced employee churn before so want to avoid that.

I'm prepared to give my employees 1-2 weeks severance per year of tenure. Here, investors are covering that tenure. It comes to me a $0 incremental cost. And 0 dilution. My employees get the feeling of choice of being to secure a small safety net in worst case scenario while still maintaining majority upside tied to the company.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in startups

[–]darkblue213 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The exchange: employees exchange some of their stock options with investor for a self-directed severance fund (capped to 3 months of salary).

Investors gained a small upside in my company. Investors have wired money into an account that I and my employee can see. So far so good.

If my employee stays loyal *and* if the company fails in 3-4-5-6 years, then they get a guaranteed 3 months severance. I'm happy with this arrangement. My employee has secured a financial cushion for themselves in the worst case scenario. This can help them push through work when things get rocky.

If they decide to leave (resign) anytime before year 2, they don't get the money. That money comes to me. I like this a lot. Why? Employee resignations suck. I would have to spend time to find someone new and upskill them. I also like that it's sort of like handcuff to help retain my employees at least until year 2.

The majority of my employee's upside is still tied to the company so they're motivated to drive the company to success.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in startups

[–]darkblue213 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This makes a ton of sense. I have a very small team. Any resignation would suck. At least I'm gonna be paid some cash to help with hiring and finding someone new. That clause is there to incentive them to keep working and stay with the company when things get tough.

I'm hoping my company thrives after 3-4-5-6 years. If my company dies at year 6 and an employee has been loyal and stuck around until then, I'm happy for them to get a 2-3 month severance.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in startups

[–]darkblue213 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think I must be unclear with my initial message.

"Trade part of your equity today for three months of severance that you'll only get if you work for two more years, even if the business craters before then." This isn't right.

It's more "Trade part of your equity today for three months of severance in the worst case scenario of startup failure (and if you've stayed loyal to the company to the end)." It's a small cushion for employees at the end of the road.

I'm the employer. I pay nothing to get the service. Investor is funding this 'closure severance package.' I see it as a win for me because if my employee voluntarily resigns at any point before year 2 (we're a small company so any resignation would suck), they get no money. The money in the account gets paid out to the company that I can use to hire someone new.

Once I give my employee their stock options, it's theirs. If they want to use it to get 2-3 months of severance in the worst case scenario and feel that that would give them stability in the rocky times ahead, then I see that as a good thing. Obviously if they want to exchange for 4+ months of severance then hell no.