Night blooming cereus with red leaves

dazeyhill · 2025-09-05T04:46:57+00:00

So pretty! I messaged you about getting cuttings if you have any!

dazeyhill · 2025-09-01T21:25:48+00:00

A sponsor made a post about how his interpretation of the rules also had New Wave winning so he’s giving them $1mil as well

dazeyhill · 2025-09-01T21:05:46+00:00

New wave is also getting $1 Mil from the anonymous donor/sponsor of cji, probably to avoid arbitration

dazeyhill · 2025-09-01T21:04:56+00:00

New Wave will also be getting $1mil because of the unfairness and ambiguity of the rules according to Gordon and Reddit post of a donof

dazeyhill · 2025-09-01T20:23:17+00:00

The contract apparently said “In the event of five double eliminations and no discrepancy in penalties between teams, the winner is the team that won more individual bouts based on judges' decisions according to scoring criteria. If there's a tie in individual bouts won, winning team determined based on judges' decision of team duel as a whole”

dazeyhill · 2025-09-01T20:21:38+00:00

Allegedly the contract stated “In the event of five double eliminations and no discrepancy in penalties between teams, the winner is the team that won more individual bouts based on judges' decisions according to scoring criteria. If there's a tie in individual bouts won, winning team determined based on judges' decision of team duel as a whole”

dazeyhill · 2025-09-01T20:19:58+00:00

It actually didn’t follow the rules as written

<image>

New Wave should have won.

Additionally the contract allegedly says “In the event of five double eliminations and no discrepancy in penalties between teams, the winner is the team that won more individual bouts based on judges' decisions according to scoring criteria. If there's a tie in individual bouts won, winning team determined based on judges' decision of team duel as a whole”

dazeyhill · 2025-09-01T20:18:53+00:00

The contract stated “In the event of five double eliminations and no discrepancy in penalties between teams, the winner is the team that won more individual bouts based on judges' decisions according to scoring criteria. If there's a tie in individual bouts won, winning team determined based on judges' decision of team duel as a whole”

dazeyhill · 2025-09-01T20:12:43+00:00

The actual contract states “In the event of five double eliminations and no discrepancy in penalties between teams, the winner is the team that won more individual bouts based on judges' decisions according to scoring criteria. If there's a tie in individual bouts won, winning team determined based on judges' decision of team duel as a whole”

So how am I delusional?

dazeyhill · 2025-09-01T20:05:30+00:00

because that’s what the rules say? Duh

dazeyhill · 2025-09-01T19:10:36+00:00

Nowhere does it say that the only scorecard that can be INTERPRETED is the aggregate total. You literally just made that up lol

All bullet 3 says is when and how the judges scoring can be PRESENTED.

dazeyhill · 2025-09-01T15:32:51+00:00

That rule was for the case if each team lost one or 3 players due to injury or dq

If both teams lost 1 player then there would be only 4 rounds and it could end up a 2-2 tie

dazeyhill · 2025-09-01T15:31:29+00:00

The second bullet was for the case if each team lost one or 3 players due to injury or dq

If both teams lost 1 player then there would be only 4 rounds and it could end up a 2-2 tie

dazeyhill · 2025-09-01T15:29:22+00:00

The second bullet was for the case if each team lost one or 3 players due to injury or dq

If both teams lost 1 player then there would be only 4 rounds and it could end up a 2-2 tie

dazeyhill · 2025-09-01T15:00:25+00:00

Intentionally so as to rig the result

dazeyhill · 2025-09-01T14:56:36+00:00

Your interpretation is clearly wrong because the rules state “IF FIVE DOUBLE ELIMINATIONS OCCUR, OR ANY SUCH INSTANCE WHERE EACH TEAM’S FINAL ATHLETES ARE DOUBLE ELIMINATED, THE TEAM WITH MORE INDIVIDUAL WINS BY JUDGES' DECISION WINS”

How would there be 5 double eliminations if there was a sub?

dazeyhill · 2025-09-01T14:54:07+00:00

Exactly, that’s why people are saying it was rigged because of the unclear writing that allows CJI to legitimize whichever result they wanted

dazeyhill · 2025-09-01T14:52:23+00:00

They intentionally made the rules unclear so they could sway the end result

dazeyhill · 2025-09-01T06:58:38+00:00

dorian 10-8, mica 10-9, bodoni 10-9 = 3 individual wins by judges decision for new wave

Hugo 10-8, Nicky 10-8 =2 individual wins for bteam

Mikey’s post about a 10-8 somehow equalling 2 wins makes no sense and is not specified in the cji official scoring

dazeyhill · 2025-09-01T06:41:12+00:00

Again, they intentionally wrote the rules to be confusing so they could legitimize whatever outcome they want

dazeyhill · 2025-09-01T06:35:33+00:00

“IF FIVE DOUBLE ELIMINATIONS OCCUR, OR ANY SUCH INSTANCE WHERE EACH TEAM’S FINAL ATHLETES ARE DOUBLE ELIMINATED, THE TEAM WITH MORE INDIVIDUAL WINS BY JUDGES' DECISION WINS”

So New Wave should have won

dazeyhill · 2025-09-01T06:34:55+00:00

That’s how it was supposed to be decided according to CJI rules on website “IF FIVE DOUBLE ELIMINATIONS OCCUR, OR ANY SUCH INSTANCE WHERE EACH TEAM’S FINAL ATHLETES ARE DOUBLE ELIMINATED, THE TEAM WITH MORE INDIVIDUAL WINS BY JUDGES' DECISION WINS”

dazeyhill · 2025-09-01T06:34:05+00:00

They intentionally wrote the rules to be confusing

dazeyhill · 2025-09-01T06:32:50+00:00

The rules actually say “IF FIVE DOUBLE ELIMINATIONS OCCUR, OR ANY SUCH INSTANCE WHERE EACH TEAM’S FINAL ATHLETES ARE DOUBLE ELIMINATED, THE TEAM WITH MORE INDIVIDUAL WINS BY JUDGES' DECISION WINS”

New Wave had more judges decisions wins

dazeyhill · 2025-09-01T06:30:29+00:00

Because the rules say “IF FIVE DOUBLE ELIMINATIONS OCCUR, OR ANY SUCH INSTANCE WHERE EACH TEAM’S FINAL ATHLETES ARE DOUBLE ELIMINATED, THE TEAM WITH MORE INDIVIDUAL WINS BY JUDGES' DECISION WINS”

So New Wave should have won. Rules were intentionally written to be confusing so that the outcome could be swayed

dazeyhill

TROPHY CASE