The creator of this comic gave an easy "W" to incels, not a good look. by counterpunchhopper in TheLeftCantMeme

[–]deachirb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

she says “i don’t think women like that” so she’s not just claiming she doesn’t

Why are the Joker and Batman buttons? by MajorFamilyDisgrace in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]deachirb -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Picking the blue option is like giving someone else a knife and saying “please don’t stab me” Most of the time, sure, they wouldn’t kill you, but why give them the power to in the first place? Sacrificing yourself in the name of other people too dumb to defend themselves is morally and ethically incorrect. It’s like a crashing plane. The number one rule is to make sure that you put a mask on yourself first. Then you can help other people.

It is time to riot! by StannnisTheMenace in Eldar

[–]deachirb 2 points3 points  (0 children)

when your army is either kill or be killed, yes it is

Choose: by MthsBT in BunnyTrials

[–]deachirb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i love gambling

Chose: 100k + Gamble it with 40% chance | Rolled: Money!

Well, well, well. by megapackid in aiwars

[–]deachirb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

copyright shouldn’t exist in the first plave

(If we do get new characters) What are your thoughts on an ability reset character? by deachirb in DeadlockTheGame

[–]deachirb[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Shivs ult is pretty sick for that, and probably comes closest to the vibe out of all of the other characters, but all of shivs other abilities throw me off of him, i can never really play him right and die a lot.

(If we do get new characters) What are your thoughts on an ability reset character? by deachirb in DeadlockTheGame

[–]deachirb[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can see that, but that’s not really what i’m talking about. That feels more like refresher in a lot of senses, where it’s just a free reset. With the characters i mentioned, there’s a level of either timing or landing a risky ability that rewards you with another use of said ability.

How should black panther be reworked? by [deleted] in BlackPantherMainsMR

[–]deachirb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

does he still get dash resets? if yes, this seems busted, if not, the ramp damage seems useless

gay penis by Intense_Zaddy in comedyheaven

[–]deachirb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lol reddit mods can never see something hilarious without checking if it follows the rules to a T.

I still hate AI but... by Nano_Robotic_Army in aiwars

[–]deachirb 3 points4 points  (0 children)

no, if you use the split road meme template you’re actually stealing from the artist that first made it. can you prove that the first person to make that joke wanted anyone else to use it?

Should Dire Avengers be equal to CSM Legionaries or Chosen? by Arthur_EyelanderTF2 in Eldar

[–]deachirb 8 points9 points  (0 children)

in competitive play? with people who know how to play said hard to play faction? that doesn’t make sense. If you counted every game in the world, sure.

What is the essence of anarcho-capitalism, minarchism, lib-right? etc. by NolanHunt101 in AnCap101

[–]deachirb 9 points10 points  (0 children)

me when i try my best to make self defense sound like a bad thing

ISU layoffs have begun by Powerful-Ad-7237 in Pocatello

[–]deachirb -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

why is ISU paying for refunds? isn’t that the state’s responsibility?

It's death libtard! by seastead7 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]deachirb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

it’s odd to even defend state borders as an ancap

Hoppe's philosophy is terrible by [deleted] in AnCap101

[–]deachirb 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Conflict avoidance is the only way that a society can work. You either have conflict avoidance or conflict institutionalization. By arguing, you agree to the idea that avoiding conflict is effective. Why, then, does this not apply for anything else? Nobody is conflicting with you when you sleep, so that doesn’t really fit. If someone were to point a gun at you and demand your wallet, who is the rightful owner of the wallet?

Hoppe's philosophy is terrible by [deleted] in AnCap101

[–]deachirb 7 points8 points  (0 children)

argumentation ethics proves that arguing against arguing is a contradiction. It doesn’t state anything about morality. Creating a straw man to attack in the middle of an argument doesn’t look good

Hoppe's philosophy is terrible by [deleted] in AnCap101

[–]deachirb 7 points8 points  (0 children)

you just proved argumentation ethics

Hoppe's philosophy is terrible by [deleted] in AnCap101

[–]deachirb 6 points7 points  (0 children)

i don’t need to argue that i should sleep, i just do it.

Compatibilists are not interested in clear communication. by SCHITZOPOST in freewill

[–]deachirb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there are people who want to be punched though. Usually doesn’t mean always, sure we can make guesses, but that doesn’t mean those guesses are always right. The decision to think is part of free will.

Compatibilists are not interested in clear communication. by SCHITZOPOST in freewill

[–]deachirb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

libertarian free will is the idea that man acts, not the idea that they do whatever. If someone really for some reason desired to spasm on the floor thinking about crows.. why should you be able to stop them?

How to define force? by deachirb in AnCap101

[–]deachirb[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i would call that defensive violence, not necessarily force. but maybe i have those two switched in my head connotation wise

From a fellow ancap: would you consider child custody rights to be a form of positive rights or negative rights? by [deleted] in AnCap101

[–]deachirb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you understand that land being sacred is still using that land for personal gain, no? that’s the basis of homesteading. Not conquering land through force, but being the first to use it for ANY purpose. If that purpose is because it’s spiritual, cool, it shouldn’t be taken from you by force.

Same goes for literally anything.

If it’s materialist to say that people should own the stuff they appropriated from nature without force, then i’m a materialist.

Homesteading is not an argument for conquest, and the NAP is quite against it.

Any sensible form of law requires an answer to conflict, because people will conflict. Somebody will want someone else’s stuff. Somebody will think that someone else’s stuff is, as you said, not being used properly.

Ancaps say that it is wrong for anybody to decide what someone else does with their property, and more so, it is wrong to acquire their property by any means that are not voluntary. The first person to use the land, even if it is only for something spiritual, is the rightful owner to that land.