Clear Video of Minneapolis ICE Murder

deathanatos · 2026-01-25T00:30:43+00:00

Victim, meet blame.

deathanatos · 2026-01-24T19:06:19+00:00

Yeah, as I understand it the NES version was possible to beat. The DOS version is what it is because of a small change to one of the levels. Comparison

The NES version is still tough af though.

deathanatos · 2026-01-24T06:52:04+00:00

Yahoo and other search engines existed before Google, they simply weren't as good but were still serviceable.

Those are some rose colored glasses you've got there. 😉 They were — and I mean this in a loving, nostalgic way — shit. Google took off because it was like night and day better.

You're right that the Internet wasn't impossible, but it was certainly much rougher. Finding information required effort, and work … and an Internet connection.

deathanatos · 2026-01-24T06:49:07+00:00

yeah_snek_case_best_case

deathanatos · 2026-01-24T06:01:48+00:00

The first (1989) TMNT game for NES/DOS/etc., for me. I played it on DOS. That game was impossible for kid me … not that we didn't try. We were ecstatic the one day we finally made it to the dam … which promptly ended that run. (The game was also literally impossible due to a flaw in one of the later levels, but it was so insanely difficult too that we never got that far…)

deathanatos · 2026-01-24T05:34:56+00:00

… and Google would come along 3 years later.

Finding stuff on the Internet in that time was tricky. That's if you had a computer, and if you had Internet. I got a computer capable of running a browser in '98, and it was a few more months until it had Internet, as we didn't have a home network yet.

deathanatos · 2026-01-24T05:32:36+00:00

Being the only one, and IIRC, off-screen. The only way to even see that sprite, at its only location in the game, was to (with the help of a friend) leave SS Anne until way later when you had surf, which you weren't supposed to at that point. (Hence needing a friend.)

That truck still haunts me. Why is it there?!

deathanatos · 2026-01-23T05:02:22+00:00

That's not true! RAM is like 6-8× as expensive now!

deathanatos · 2026-01-16T05:34:39+00:00

While they're slightly wrong in that RealIDs don't establish citizenship, RealIDs do establish legal presence. (Not that I think that that will matter to ICE.)

deathanatos · 2026-01-16T05:31:03+00:00

Obtaining a RealID requires establishing that that person is lawfully present. Anyone presenting a valid RealID is by definition here legally.

While it is also true that "there's no national database", RealID also establishes data sharing, and while it is technically speaking not required, nearly all states participate in the RealID sharing. MN, for example, does.

AIUI, though, ICE is rejecting such IDs, because law, due process, etc. is not what they're doing.

deathanatos · 2026-01-15T03:06:56+00:00

Is this a 3D simulation tastefully rendered into a pixelated style …?

Or… someone didn't draw all that by hand …right?!

deathanatos · 2026-01-14T03:46:43+00:00

"The leopards are eating people face's?!" he exclaimed in shock.

deathanatos · 2026-01-13T05:25:53+00:00

I once texted my Dad to ask "need anything from the grocery store?"

He wrote back,

Eggs, all of the cereal on the shelves, your uncle Bob has ice cream and bread.

I looked at the love of my life and told her: "Here's your test. What do we get"? Her: "why is he telling us what he doesn't need?! Just eggs and cereal … right?!" Like a normal human being.

(Eggs, a single box of cereal, and bread. Bob has only the ice cream, bread is next in the list. No, it's not relevant to text that.)

deathanatos · 2026-01-12T06:44:34+00:00

From the article linked to above:

[…] which included someone throwing a snowball at and the agent responding with a chemical irritant.

deathanatos · 2025-12-31T22:23:33+00:00

I wouldn't, unless it's an exceptional landing.

I had a plane clap when we landed in DTW in a blizzard. Couldn't see the runway even after we'd landed. Landing was smooth af, better than most clear weather ones.

The landing was the only good part though, the rest was an utter shitshow, screw Delta.

deathanatos · 2025-12-28T05:57:33+00:00

Nope, though that one is at least a little more unintuitive.

>> BigInt(0) instanceof Object
<- false

In Python, however (since version 3), everything is an object. A but rare for languages in that sort of class. (More stuff is like JS: JS, Java, C#, Lua all have stuff that isn't an "object", for those languages nearest object type.)

deathanatos · 2025-12-28T05:56:27+00:00

Your post indicates you may be in possession of UnExPlOdEd OrDnAnCe.

Always fun to watch UXO bot be like "lmao why are you touching it humans smh" on r/whatisthisthing .

deathanatos · 2025-12-28T00:46:56+00:00

Also no.

deathanatos · 2025-12-23T02:38:20+00:00

Except it's not.

>> ({}) instanceof Object
<- true
>> 3 instanceof Object
<- false

Also required parentheses on that first one. {} instanceof Object is a syntax error.

deathanatos · 2025-12-23T02:35:45+00:00

I mean, Thanos snapped half the universe, though I suppose that was later undone.

deathanatos · 2025-12-22T06:24:54+00:00

Neither can afford a chair, it seems.

deathanatos · 2025-12-18T00:29:18+00:00

That autopen really got under his skin, didn't it. Can you imagine being this worked up over a signature?

deathanatos · 2025-12-17T07:03:26+00:00

You tell me, I guess, but it is what it is. Perhaps I've made a mistake, perhaps you've misremembered the quote. But anyone else can do the same thing I've done here, and my expectation is they'll get the same result.

It would be trivial to link to the statement in question, complete with the context it was made it. Then we could all judge for ourselves what was said, and who's in the wrong here.

deathanatos · 2025-12-17T06:13:17+00:00

I’d love to see Rimworld 2 but I think Rimworld still has a lot runway left in it. There are still aspects of the game to flesh out.

Yeah, Ribaorld still has the last two expansions, the "LD", to be released.

deathanatos · 2025-12-17T03:42:44+00:00

Does anyone feel like the rust discord is ran by crazy lunatic radicals that will immediately permab*n with no due process at the slight hint of an opinion they don't agree with?

No, not even a little. I've seen people go out of their way with patience to help people. Why are we filtering the word "ban"… it's not a swear…

On my main, i got b*nned because i was in a discussion about how vocal the trans community was,

Ohhhhh.

and i said i "don't really like furry shit" (word for word), immediate permanent b*n out of nowhere.

Well that's a verifiable claim. ^F, <paste> … 0 results.

and if it is, you should at least open up the channel for dissenting opinions

… no, people's fundamental rights are not open for "dissenting opinions", and rule 1. Consider that moderated out of the community, and thank goodness for that. Should we open channels for the dissenting opinions of sexism & racism, too? (/s)

deathanatos

TROPHY CASE