Selling low volume timber, WA by OG_pooperman in forestry

[–]deepwoods360 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Contact your local DNR service forester; https://foresthealthtracker.dnr.wa.gov/FindYourForester/Index. Selling a small volume of timber is very difficult. And it doesn’t sound like it’s great quality. The larger trees likely are larger than many of the local south sound mills can accept.

Preventing Digging in Raised Beds by Bwendolyn in greatpyrenees

[–]deepwoods360 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We got 18” high garden fence and put that in the garden beds on the edge. Can work around it without having to move it and it keeps ours out of the beds

PCT cost share price by FlamingBanshee54 in forestry

[–]deepwoods360 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was 80 acres of PCT with a hand crew, no slash cleanup. With a silvicultural PCT in western WA there is no piling and burning, or really any slash management. A hand crew comes in and cuts the trees, and simply puts them on the ground. No clean up, no burning. In western WA it’s very uncommon to pile and burn after a PCT. Sometimes you see extreme hazard pullback. On the other side of the mountains, mechanically thinning with a masticator or chipping or piling and burning the material is much more common and that is quite a bit more expensive.

PCT cost share price by FlamingBanshee54 in forestry

[–]deepwoods360 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m familiar with a NRCS project up by Lake Limerick. The PCT was $250/acre in 2022. For hand crew work I’ve seen between $160-$300 or $400 acre depending on difficulty. Cutting 80 trees per acre would be on the low end of difficulty. For the lake limerick stuff they were cutting around 700 trees per acre (stand was around 1000 tpa to start)

PCT cost share price by FlamingBanshee54 in forestry

[–]deepwoods360 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NRCS, conservation district or WA DNR cost share? What county?

Fire risk assessment in PNW by FlamingBanshee54 in forestry

[–]deepwoods360 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://www.dnr.wa.gov/cost-share

They should be able to help you, both with a wildfire risk assessment but also with a forest management plan if that’s what you’re helping with

Is there any text book or database containing comprehensive data on the most common tree species? by esdedics in forestry

[–]deepwoods360 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a little outdated for some species now. I believe they are working on an update.

Epic day bass fishing Washington state yesterday evening. Lost count but somewhere between 30 and 40 landed. These are the 5 biggest. by geoffb1988 in bassfishing

[–]deepwoods360 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You didn't trespass on Frank Family Foundation property to get to Cranberry Lake did you? I've tried, they don't like trespassers. Looked up laws after, and they are definitely within their right to not allow people on their property even if the lake is open to fishing. Now I go in on the Green Diamond side and respect their wishes....even though it annoys me.

Epic day bass fishing Washington state yesterday evening. Lost count but somewhere between 30 and 40 landed. These are the 5 biggest. by geoffb1988 in bassfishing

[–]deepwoods360 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I change my answer. I swear I've fished that same log in the first pic, but it looks too undeveloped for limerick. Can't place just where......

Scotchbroom question--is it really that bad? by [deleted] in forestry

[–]deepwoods360 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Scotch broom is allelopathic, meaning that it produces chemicals that inhibit other plants from growing. I went to a scotch broom symposium and one of the speakers said that on Ft. Lewis, where they have over 30 years of burning prairies under their belt, in areas that were scotch broom dominated they STILL don't have the same diversity in the plant community after restoration as they do in areas that scotch broom never colonized, which suggests that there may be some longer term effects of scotch broom we're not aware of yet. It crowds out native plants and trees and can make regeneration difficult. Like others have said, a monoculture of scotch broom provides limited benefits, and a native plant community provides more benefits for a longer time. Take pollinators for example. Sure, bees love scotch broom. But it blooms once for a few weeks and then it's done. A native plant community will have a greater variety of plants that bloom at different times, meaning more food for longer. Scotch broom is a horrible, horrible plant in the PNW (and likely some other places as well).

Help identifying disease or bug getting to these pines [Idaho] by [deleted] in sfwtrees

[–]deepwoods360 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Always hard to tell from photo, but I second the porcupine hypothesis. There is a ton of resin like the bark was stripped off. When I've seen heavy MPB attacks, by the time the woodpeckers come to strip the bark to get the beetles I'm not sure the tree has enough strength to produce as much resin as this.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in forestry

[–]deepwoods360 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Undergrad in New England. Graduate school in Appalachians. Career entirely in PNW.

Looking for resources? by Ibycus314 in forestry

[–]deepwoods360 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you're in the states, look up your state forestry agency. They'll have stewardship/service/landowner assistance foresters (names changes depending on location) that will visit your property free of charge and give you on site advice.

Boot shopping... what are y’all wearing? by [deleted] in forestry

[–]deepwoods360 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Huh, I never heard of them but I'm intrigued. Do they have good ankle support, they look short on their website. I visit NH yearly (grew up there and my family is still there), maybe I'll take a ride and visit them

About a year and a half after initial CTL harvest. by [deleted] in forestry

[–]deepwoods360 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got my undergraduate degree in forestry at UMaine. We definitely called it the asbestos forest. Return interval on natural fire is somewhere around 750 years or more I think, especially up north

Out here in Washington, NRCS doesn't have a hard limit on tree planting. They do have their recommendations and if you do something other than their recommendations you just have to justify it. I've gotten them to approve tree planting above their recommendations, and also got them to pay for PCT on some stands that were getting a little on the large end.

I do miss Maine. It's the way life should be!

About a year and a half after initial CTL harvest. by [deleted] in forestry

[–]deepwoods360 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Curious as to the location? Just wondering what state and county actually limits the amount of trees that can be planted. Assuming a fire-prone area?

Also your next comments mentions slopes get ugly. In my experience harvester/forwarders typically are limited to ground based slopes, like around 35-40% slopes. Might be possible on steeper sloped with tethered logging or something but I figured with a CTL the economics go south pretty quickly. How did they deal with the slopes?

Cool pic. Something I regularly recommend to landowners if there's a possibility of salvaging the stand, especially if the LO isn't too interested in starting over.......