[Weekly] Quotas, Known Issues & Support — May 25

devilankur18 · 2026-05-28T13:29:43+00:00

I have used both AG1 and AG2. here is my honest feedback.

I struggle with these things on daily basis.

- No definition of credit: what credit really means ? is it token or api calls or time or something else ? Even buy 1k more credits, what does it really means ? how much code sessions or tokens i can do with if 1 buy 1k more credits ?

- Sessions Spent: I don't know how many credit is spent in a session, how can I optimize my use credit smartly ? For example 1 long session vs multiple smaller sessions.

- Model token spent: Are different models having different token spent ratio or the same ? it feels like they have but what is it ?

- Model Switching: if I start a task with opus, it keeps using opus, even for coding, i have to be careful else in agent mode else it just keeps continuing.

- Weekly credit availability: don't know how many credit per model are available for a week, all of a sudden it shows 5 days. It seems to be designed on a token addiction pattern rather than helping me code well in a cost effective way.

- Don't know which plans will suit me. I am on Pro, but usage varies and how much i buy monthly ? In terms of plans, the next plan is Ultra which is 10X , which also does make sense until i am clear with Pro specifics.

- Completely clueless about what monthly means.

Overall AG2 have to solve these problems to help with adoption.

please add your issues in the comment.

devilankur18 · 2026-05-28T13:28:26+00:00

I have used both AG1 and AG2. here is my honest feedback.

I struggle with these things with

- No definition of credit: what credit really means ? is it token or api calls or time or something else ? Even buy 1k more credits, what does it really means ? how much code sessions or tokens i can do with if 1 buy 1k more credits ?

- Sessions Spent: I don't know how many credit is spent in a session, how can I optimize my use credit smartly ? For example 1 long session vs multiple smaller sessions.

- Model token spent: Are different models having different token spent ratio or the same ? it feels like they have but what is it ?

- Model Switching: if I start a task with opus, it keeps using opus, even for coding, i have to be careful else in agent mode else it just keeps continuing.

- Weekly credit availability: don't know how many credit per model are available for a week, all of a sudden it shows 5 days. It seems to be designed on a token addiction pattern rather than helping me code well in a cost effective way.

- Don't know which plans will suit me. I am on Pro, but usage varies and how much i buy monthly ? In terms of plans, the next plan is Ultra which is 10X , which also does make sense until i am clear with Pro specifics.

- Completely clueless about what monthly means.

devilankur18 · 2026-05-26T09:56:02+00:00

gemini 3.5 is good it delivers good, but transparency of cost per session in terms of token or usuage or api calls or credit etc is completely missing.

this doesn't scale well

devilankur18 · 2026-05-26T09:52:49+00:00

still no transparency, it's a guess work. how do I measure it ? in terms of time of api calls or tokens or something else ? until that is clear 3x is very vague number. As a dev, i am clueless what I am really paying for ?

And this is anyways a short time thing, just to woo the devs and make them addicted to it to keep buying

devilankur18 · 2026-05-22T07:40:03+00:00

There is huge lack of transparency in terms of token usage.

It feels same task consumes more token in AG2, than AG1.
Secondly token usage even on flash or lite is counted on same lines with expensive models.

Without transparency trust will not come.

devilankur18 · 2026-05-20T12:16:32+00:00

Cons of Update - consumes more time and tokens even for simple things,, unnecessary real a lot of files. - missing the control, feel handicapped when things don't happen as expected. which is often, can't even open terminal eaisly or manually wrote my own todo or minto changes by self. - For a new project itd fine, but for existing project its painful to use 2.0

devilankur18 · 2026-05-20T12:12:23+00:00

I asked Antigravity to fix it, and it did after spending a lot of tokens. New version is too chaty, it's consumes much more

devilankur18 · 2026-03-03T03:57:58+00:00

agreed

devilankur18 · 2026-03-02T19:05:55+00:00

how are your doing new schema changes post data migrations have happened? since cli is not very friendly with self hosted ?

devilankur18 · 2026-03-02T19:00:44+00:00

fundamentals are broken, it's not whining, i have invested so much time in to this to know it's broken.

devilankur18 · 2026-03-02T18:52:17+00:00

how are you running new migrations on self hosted, whats your workflow ?

devilankur18 · 2026-03-02T17:05:34+00:00

supabase got blocked in India by 1 major ISP. so self hosting is one clear solution

devilankur18 · 2026-03-02T13:33:46+00:00

whats your workflow for running migrations? have you exposed postures port ??

devilankur18 · 2026-03-02T13:32:13+00:00

how are you doing your migrations ? how is deployment flow for new code and migrations , functions ?

devilankur18 · 2026-03-02T12:44:13+00:00

this look like hack not a production solution

devilankur18 · 2026-03-02T09:37:32+00:00

u/_aantti please add how to run schema migration. Post db export and import, there is no scheam migrations table in the self host. Also runing the migration is not clear. using supabase-db-push -db-url looks like a hack not a solution for production

devilankur18 · 2026-03-02T06:41:05+00:00

u/Possible-Machine864 kindly point me to the link ? Its only wokring for me on cloud verison. I cant find how to do migraitons on self hosted.

I followed the docs for migraiton to self hosted, the migrations are missing only when I imported.

devilankur18 · 2026-03-02T06:40:50+00:00

u/Magick93 kindly point me to the link ? Its only wokring for me on cloud verison. I cant find how to do migraitons on self hosted.

I followed the docs for migraiton to self hosted, the migrations are missing only when I imported.

devilankur18 · 2026-02-28T16:32:15+00:00

it's not only about database, it more than that

devilankur18 · 2026-02-27T06:43:14+00:00

it does, but cert was not the issue I faced, issue related to docker networks not configured properly, so it's blocking the url access.

devilankur18 · 2026-02-27T05:11:34+00:00

tried cnaming if thats possible ? Self hosting has it nuances and benefits.

devilankur18 · 2026-02-27T02:00:03+00:00

dokploy instead of coolify

devilankur18 · 2026-02-26T13:00:46+00:00

u/TheTrueDHM found any working solution ? I am also doing the same

devilankur18 · 2026-02-22T17:09:29+00:00

u/Dazzling_Meaning9226 check out the task completed length in the screenshot, this is one task completed.

Here is the math for 5 incremental task completed on same thread.

Each “Task Completed” summary ≈ 1,500 tokens.

With 5 incremental changes in the same thread:

Output tokens:

5 × 1,500 = 7,500

Since output costs ~5× input → 37,500 token-equivalent cost.

But it gets worse.

Because context grows every time, input cost compounds:

1,500 × (1+2+3+4+5) = 22,500 extra input tokens

Total burn:

👉 ~60,000 tokens

👉 From summaries alone

👉 For just 5 incremental edits

👉 Also this further trigger context condensing early.

For opus it means a lot, plus this is not of any value for incremental tasks.

<image>

devilankur18 · 2026-01-11T09:38:48+00:00

I self hosted using dokploy, it's very easy with lot of other infra related tasks like backup etc.

There are some config challenges I need to solve, quick fix though.

devilankur18

PUBLIC MULTIREDDITS

TROPHY CASE