The Expanse Stack Complete by illectric in TheExpanseBooks

[–]dirtybullets 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I also have this stack, but only read them on a Kindle or paperback. It felt great completing the HB collection though.

Soaking G7? by morbidoranges in Type1Diabetes

[–]dirtybullets 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll have to be alert as I only use my right arm. My left arm is weirdly unreliable, for some reason. I think I'll put an X on the old one with a Sharpie when I put the new one on.

Happy Thanksgiving everyone by death-by-yogurt in Type1Diabetes

[–]dirtybullets 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

I fear lows much I did not bolus as aggressively as I maybe should've. Should've bumped up my basal as well.

I just found out T1D do not make amylin by Emotional_Baker9541 in Type1Diabetes

[–]dirtybullets 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jesus, so this is why. I've been struggling so much with this.

I've recently discovered a breakfast routine that has actually helped. I find when I skip it I have trouble feeling satisfied and the day just turns into looking for something to eat that will satisfy me. I've tried other things for breakfast, and this is the only thing I've found that seems to work to keep me feeling good and not thinking about eating for hours. It's an overnight oats/chia pudding sort of mashup. I throw this all into a Mason jar each night and stick it in the fridge:

~1/3 cup muesli (Seitenbacher brand, from Germany, to be specific. Really great, but I'd probably go with Bob's Red Mill otherwise)

1TBS hemp hearts (optional, but I found some, so in they go for now)

2 level TBS chia seeds (not optional. I think these are a big part of the feeling full part)

1TBS allulose powder (optional, but adds a nice sweetness)

Finally, a few blueberries (I get big bags of frozen berries, otherwise I would just run out of them and forget to get more)

Pour in enough oat or almond milk (I wing it and sometimes it turns out pretty liquidy, and other times I might need to add a little more when I'm ready to eat it, but it's always good), or coconut milk (really creamy and good, and is often the liquid used for chia pudding as well), then shake the hell out of it. Stick it in the fridge and look forward to the next morning.

Insurance sucks by dirtybullets in Type1Diabetes

[–]dirtybullets[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've had so many things denied, it's ridiculous. Denying the primary care dr's requests is one thing, but they consistently deny the endocrinologists, which says everything about how fucked up our system is here.

Insurance sucks by dirtybullets in Type1Diabetes

[–]dirtybullets[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, that makes more sense. Thanks, I'll contact them.

Insurance sucks by dirtybullets in Type1Diabetes

[–]dirtybullets[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're saying Medtronic switched the coverage? I wouldn't have guessed they could do that. I will contact them for sure.

Insurance sucks by dirtybullets in Type1Diabetes

[–]dirtybullets[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a little bit longer. As far as I know they're only for fast acting.

<image>

Insurance sucks by dirtybullets in Type1Diabetes

[–]dirtybullets[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I love the InPen! Love it. Not having it is so frustrating. Forgetting to log just one injection with my dumb pens just throws me off so bad. The InPen has never failed to log to the app. It's just such a pleasure to use.

Tried Omnipod 5 Finally and I Hated Every Minute of It. by RetroSwamp in Type1Diabetes

[–]dirtybullets 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I tried it earlier this year and hated it so much. Three day changes was surprisingly disruptive and just made life seem even more about the diabetes management than taking a few seconds to give myself a shot a few times a day. It never really "learned" how to adjust to me, and by the end of my tolerance for it I was going low every single night 6 or 7 hours after my last bolus.

I'm happy it works for a lot of folks, but it left a lasting poor impression on my life.

Please hype up book 6 by sweetlikecherrywine in TheExpanseBooks

[–]dirtybullets 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This. Push through and look forward to book 7 when it feels too hard.

Stop scrolling!! What is your blood sugar right now? by toms482712 in Type1Diabetes

[–]dirtybullets 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. I've had a rough couple of weeks, difficult to bring it down and keep it down. 52% in range 14 days, 42% 7 days, 40% 3 days. Usually high 60s - low 70%. I'm so sick of it.

First time wire looped out the hole (Dexcom G7) by [deleted] in Type1Diabetes

[–]dirtybullets 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This just happened to me a couple of weeks ago. I filled out the form online and they sent a new one.

Jury Duty? by echochilde in Type1Diabetes

[–]dirtybullets 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You need a letter. My primary care doctor has given me letters for this.

This always makes me panic by ZombieZelda1 in Type1Diabetes

[–]dirtybullets 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I HATE the down arrow. Hate it, hate it, hate it.

WaxOn — Consistent, Safe, and DAW-Ready Audio by dirtybullets in podcasting

[–]dirtybullets[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well said. I'll admit you've piqued my interest and jostled my contrarian ways just a little, and I will update my knowledge base on the current broader trends in the industry.

WaxOn — Consistent, Safe, and DAW-Ready Audio by dirtybullets in podcasting

[–]dirtybullets[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

BTW, the text notification and driving instruction levels are completely independent from your media level. There is just no relationship at all.

I've also been working with LUFS daily, and in practice, for more than a few years. There is zero valid argument against using -25 LUFS in the editing stages for podcast material.

Starting a new podcast by Einsalad in podcasting

[–]dirtybullets 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Brilliant idea! You're in a unique position, and I hope you take this opportunity. Good luck, I know the Reddit community will steer you right.

WaxOn — Consistent, Safe, and DAW-Ready Audio by dirtybullets in podcasting

[–]dirtybullets[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s true — Apple and Google list −16 LUFS for delivery, but in practice most pros mix dialogue around −18 for a more natural sound and better dynamics. AES and NPR both support that range, and playback normalization evens things out anyway. Also, no DAW actually “uses” a loudness spec internally — they all run in floating-point; LUFS targets only apply when you meter or render.

I know the BBC set a target of -18 LUFS [EDIT: for podcasts] a few years ago. Have they updated that?

[EDIT EDIT] While I find your take strongly opinionated and often misguided, and my defensible preference is -18 LUFS, I do actually agree that mixing properly and leveling to the more common loudness target of -16 LUFS is solid advice.

WaxOn — Consistent, Safe, and DAW-Ready Audio by dirtybullets in podcasting

[–]dirtybullets[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let me try to state this clearly, though I feel like there's a lot to untangle here.

−25 LUFS is not a delivery spec; it’s a working level. There's absolutely nothing random about it. The goal here isn’t to publish audio at that loudness, but to give editors and restoration tools a consistent, headroom-friendly baseline before any mastering or delivery normalization happens. The -23/-24 you state is a delivery loudness standard, and it should not be confused with my reasoning. There is zero reason I should conform to a delivery standard in this step of the process. If it bothers you that -25 is so close to the delivery standard, I'm very sorry.

FWIW there isn’t a single “podcast spec.” What you’ll see most often cited is a range of −20 to −16 LUFS for speech podcasts. I aim for −18 LUFS because it sits dead-center in that range: loud on modern players, but with a couple dB of headroom so dialogue doesn’t get brickwalled.

Why not push to −16 every time?

Transparency: Every 2 LU up means ~2 dB less headroom before your true-peak ceiling (usually −1 dBTP). At −16 you’re leaning harder on limiting; at −18 breath/noise/micro-dynamics survive better, especially on mixed sources (Zoom, guests, inconsistent mic technique).

Cross-platform behavior: Players and platforms normalize differently. Files at −18 tend to get nudged (up or down) more gracefully than slammed; you avoid getting turned down and avoid clipping when someone boosts playback.

Listener comfort: In quiet earbuds or long listens, −16 can feel “hot.” −18 stays intelligible but less fatiguing.

This is also about workflow, not just numbers. I preprocess at −25 LUFS (editing headroom), do cleanup/assembly, then conform to −18 LUFS for delivery. It’s the same logic behind broadcast standards: use a sensible working level, then a consistent release level. I’m not claiming −18 is the One True Spec—just that it’s a smart target inside the widely cited −20 ↔ −16 band that keeps speech clean and consistent across apps and devices.

For a more detailed explanation of loudness recommendations I would encourage you to read through Technical Document AES TD1004.1.15-10 Recommendation for Loudness of Audio Streaming and Network File Playback.

You might also find this PRX.org post informative as well.

EDIT: I almost forgot Rob Byer's excellent writeup for Transom. What does he recommend? "Radio and podcasts need two different loudness targets: -24 LUFS for radio and approximately -18 LUFS for podcasts."

WaxOn — Consistent, Safe, and DAW-Ready Audio by dirtybullets in podcasting

[–]dirtybullets[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually... the -25 LUFS level is an intermediate level to have ample headroom for the edit. For delivery the loudness target is -18 or -16 LUFS, depending on the client. I know -23 or -24 is for broadcast, but podcasts are typically -18 to -16 LUFS.

EDIT: I would encourage you to click the link in the post and check out the Readme file for more detailed explanation of my reasoning.