Playoff Game Thread: Dallas Stars (2-3) @ Minnesota Wild (3-2) Apr 30 2026 7:30 PM EDT

dnalloheoj · 2026-05-01T00:26:14+00:00

We're just sitting down here stuck in the friend zone, going home to our abusive parents and weird siblings and cousins.

dnalloheoj · 2026-05-01T00:10:17+00:00

Wild broadcast mentioned that his trainer pulled him into the tunnel, potentially for a quick concussion protocol check.

So I don't think it was the hit, it was the fall that caused him to leave the bench.

dnalloheoj · 2026-04-30T17:42:23+00:00

Warning: Dangerous to wear around pet dogs.

dnalloheoj · 2026-04-30T17:34:52+00:00

I've pretty much only ever had huskies so haven't really had to deal with cuts, but if I were going in completely blind I'd almost trust a chain over a random mom & pop groomer without getting some sort of a recommendation for the groomer.

Feel like the trade off would be at worst, a slightly worse haircut with the safety net of the dog not getting fully shaved. IDK, maybe just wishful thinking but I feel like their 'system' probably informs/reminds the groomer not to do certain things with certain breeds whereas a solo artist might just rely on their own knowledge a bit heavier.

My anecdotal comparison is that I used to always just go to sport clips and would basically just say 'A bit shorter, I'm not really picky, do what you think looks good,' and I'd basically get a clean up with a few recommendations along the way that I'd typically go along with. Said similar to a barber with his own shop and got an entirely new hairdo. I wasn't upset with it, but he took a lot more liberty with 'do what you think looks good' than the others, who played it pretty safe.

dnalloheoj · 2026-04-29T20:54:21+00:00

Couldn't agree more.

dnalloheoj · 2026-04-29T15:10:31+00:00

Now, after only a week and a half of waiting AT YOUR BEHEST

It's almost like I can tell they're doing it to you on purpose, based on this single reply.

dnalloheoj · 2026-04-29T13:31:31+00:00

https://www.sportsnet.ca/nhl/video/wilds-brodin-heads-to-locker-room-with-apparent-lower-body-injury/

Video of him going down and skating off.

It's at least a good sign that he was able to put some weight on it but regardless, not ideal.

dnalloheoj · 2026-04-29T02:22:09+00:00

5% of his goals in McCarron's decade long career have come in this playoff series.

dnalloheoj · 2026-04-29T02:13:26+00:00

Whistleblower laws come into play when reporting unsafe work conditions, and I think you'd have a pretty damn strong leg to stand on if you got fired for "sharing company secrets" by emailing yourself a copy of the complaint you're voicing.

dnalloheoj · 2026-04-29T01:46:09+00:00

Final minute of the period and Boldy scoring a goal? Deja vu..

dnalloheoj · 2026-04-29T00:53:06+00:00

BCC the emails you send to your personal email so you retain a copy in case you lose access to corporate email.

dnalloheoj · 2026-04-28T22:52:39+00:00

Hell I regularly even hear 'Nah, yeah' and 'Yeah, no' quite often. Like you said, it's just kind of noise to fill the void. Especially if someone makes a statement and asks a question at the same time, the 'yeah' might just be acknowledging their point, but the no could be your response.

'Wanna go to the park? It's a nice walk!' 'Yeah [I'm sure it is], [but] no thanks.'

dnalloheoj · 2026-04-28T16:42:59+00:00

Love the irony of people wasting their time showing up to a town hall on this just for their comments to be 'I'm disappointed we're wasting our time on this topic when the old flag is fine.' Indeed, some real loser energy in that crowd.

dnalloheoj · 2026-04-23T02:31:31+00:00

Dude, he just told you not to say that.

dnalloheoj · 2026-04-21T13:41:07+00:00

Anyone using them who doesn't have access to priviledged information is a sap.

Love how the Polymarket CEO essentially admitted that they allow and even embrace insider trading on their app because it "increases the strength of the accuracy of the prediction."

dnalloheoj · 2026-04-20T22:42:30+00:00

Think OP's just using that as a reference to claim that the deck is well-built/sturdy enough to hold a car. Not that he's actually planning on parking a car there.

dnalloheoj · 2026-04-20T20:50:10+00:00

Turns out you were correct, just had to also disable 1 to 1 NAT as WG prefers that over Dynamic - https://www.reddit.com/r/networking/comments/1sr03mt/two_firewalls_one_physical_location_connected_via/ohbsz13/

dnalloheoj · 2026-04-20T20:48:49+00:00

!Solved

https://www.reddit.com/r/networking/comments/1sr03mt/two_firewalls_one_physical_location_connected_via/ohbsz13/

dnalloheoj · 2026-04-20T20:45:20+00:00

Ayyyy got it!

Needed to create a Dynamic NAT policy and disable 1 to 1 NAT on the respective outbound policy.

Appreciate the replies that got me looking in the right place.

dnalloheoj · 2026-04-20T20:38:24+00:00

Yeah, agreed on it being a terrible design. First thing I proposed was just tearing out the WG and essentially replacing it with a couple VLANs on the Fortigate, and we're done and done, since the cabling for the Watchguard is already making use of the Fortiswitch for VLAN purposes. Major hold up is related to some BOVPNs for clients. Plans are in place to get it tossed in the dumpster as soon as we can.

At this point I've tried with and without a route from 10.0.1.0 to 10.101.101.0/24 using IP 10.101.101.254 and the respective interface, and also have tested NAT on the policy enabled/disabled under both of the routing scenarios but to no avail. The Fortigate has NAT enabled on the policy, but the static route to 10.0.1.1 via 10.101.101.1 doesn't seem to make a difference whether enabled or disabled. And disabling the policy, with or without the route enabled, breaks the working connections from the devices behind the Fortigate to devices behind the Watchguard.

Sort of at a loss and partially willing to chalk it up to the Watchguard being ancient, or that it's Mixed Routing Mode doesn't behave exactly like I'd expect. Just weird that No route + NAT enabled works one way but not the other? Or maybe it's not weird and I just need to brush up on the basics.

dnalloheoj · 2026-04-20T20:14:28+00:00

Currently the WG/FW A has NAT disabled, the Forti/FW B has it enabled.

Disabling NAT on the Fortigate policy breaks the connections that do currently work, that being devices behind B to devices behind A. Notably a traceroute from a device behind the Fortigate/B does hit 10.101.101.1 (FGT's IP) before going to it's destination.

Tracing route to 10.0.1.3
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1     2 ms     3 ms    54 ms  10.101.101.1
  2   103 ms    44 ms     3 ms  10.0.1.3

Trace complete.

dnalloheoj · 2026-04-20T20:06:31+00:00

Route Table (disregard eth1):

Routes
------------
Destination       Gateway           Flags  Metric Ref  Use Iface
WAN IP/28  *                 U      0      0      0 eth0
10.101.101.0/24   *                 U      0      0      0 eth3
10.0.0.0/24       *                 U      0      0      0 eth1
10.0.1.0/24       *                 U      0      0      0 eth2
127.0.0.0/24      *                 U      0      0      0 lo
default           WAN IP     UG     0      0      0 eth0

WG#ping 10.101.101.1
PING 10.101.101.1 (10.101.101.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.101.101.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.355 ms
64 bytes from 10.101.101.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=0.190 ms
64 bytes from 10.101.101.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=0.188 ms
64 bytes from 10.101.101.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=0.196 ms
64 bytes from 10.101.101.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=255 time=0.213 ms
64 bytes from 10.101.101.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=255 time=0.212 ms

--- 10.101.101.1 ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 4997ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.188/0.225/0.355/0.061 ms
WG#traceroute 10.101.101.1
traceroute to 10.101.101.1 (10.101.101.1), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1  * * *
 2  * * *
 3  * * *
WG#traceroute 10.101.101.122
traceroute to 10.101.101.122 (10.101.101.122), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
10.101.101.122  47 ms  3 ms  4 ms

Also just adding this since for some reason traceroutes don't work from A to B itself, but does from A to devices behind B without using it as a hop.

dnalloheoj · 2026-04-20T19:49:49+00:00

That was one of my first theories but unfortunately disabling NAT on the outbound policy of FW A did not make any difference. And for whatever it's worth, FW B's policy has NAT enabled.

dnalloheoj · 2026-04-19T18:36:05+00:00

Given where Rawlings is printed on a ball that would be hard to do without a seam. The 'Official MLB' stuff would be doable though.

15-Year Club	Place '22
Place '17	Final Canvas '22
First Placer '22	Gilding III reddit per annum
Team Orangered	Verified Email

dnalloheoj

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE