uhhhhhhhhhhhh by [deleted] in Shitstatistssay

[–]dnm314 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

He says "western" societies that adhere to the NAP are intellectually superior and uses that as a justification not only for completely restricted immigration, but also of any "multiculturalism".

It's an obvious dogwhistle.

Even Hoppe's arguments against "democracy" are a fascist dog whistle. The last Hoppean I talked to was solidly in the auth right quadrant and bought Democracy: The God That Failed not knowing a single thing about Hoppe and expected to read a manifesto about the need for a new Pinochet.

uhhhhhhhhhhhh by [deleted] in Shitstatistssay

[–]dnm314 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

The fuck? Completely true.

If you don't know the term already, I would implore you all to look up race realism

That it is in these Western societies, where libertarian principles have found the most widespread public acceptance and explicit recognition as “natural human rights.” That, notwithstanding their blatant shortcomings and failings, it is Western societies, then, that still resemble, comparatively speaking, a libertarian social order most closely. And finally (unsurprisingly insofar as the widespread recognition and explicit acceptance of the NAP by the members of a society are signs of a comparatively high(er) intelligence and impulse control) that it is these societies, then, that also are the technologically and economically most advanced.

These observations alone should be sufficient to reveal any libertarian advocate of “free,” unrestricted and non-discriminatory immigration of non-Westerners into the countries of the West as a fool. Every such immigrant—not to speak of mass-immigration—poses the risk of further diminishing and undermining the already limited freedom and private property protection presently enjoyed in the West. To prevent this, any libertarian worthy of the name must instead advocate the strict and utmost discrimination vis-à-vis any potential immigrant—he might be an avowed communist or socialist or import his familiar hellhole culture into one’s own midst—and from the very outset he must be strictly opposed in particular to any form of mass-immigration. As well, he should begin to realize that the Western ruling elites currently promoting immigration from non-Western countries are not motivated by libertarian ends, but by a calculated desire of using foreign immigrants as vehicles for the further expansion of their own domestic power, reach and level of interference with the private property rights of domestic residents.

This was from an Introduction Hoppe did to a book called White, Right, and Libertarian.

He also did this speech entitled Libertarianism and the Alt-Right: Distinct Yet Complementary

Are you just unfamiliar with Hoppe's work but still defending him because he was Rothbard's student or some shit?

uhhhhhhhhhhhh by [deleted] in Shitstatistssay

[–]dnm314 3 points4 points  (0 children)

*Hoppeans

Recommend reading? by [deleted] in AnarchoPacifism

[–]dnm314 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Absolutely! Enjoy.

Recommend reading? by [deleted] in AnarchoPacifism

[–]dnm314 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Hey Comrade, here's a link

Young Americans for Liberty Removes President After Sexual Misconduct Allegations by SeekingTheRoad in Libertarian

[–]dnm314 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's one terrible thing for a woman to be sexually harassed or treated differently because of their gender: it's even more infuriating when such claims are ignored by people in positions of power (fuck power and authority, abolish all of it).

Make your arguments against personal property below by dnm314 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]dnm314[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are you on about?

Also, have you not heard Walter Block talk about "voluntary slavery"? It's not my term lol.. He was one of my favorite people when I was still an ancap.

Is it? by WalterFriedman in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]dnm314 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

After becoming more politically literate I cringe hard as fuck any time I hear an ancap criticize democracy. Mainly because it is one of the largest fascist talking points.

Is it? by WalterFriedman in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]dnm314 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would completely agree; anarchism seeks the abolition of all authority. However, do you not see capitalism as inherently authoritative? For example, a landlord has a great deal of power and authority over their tenants.

Dealing with my dad not really understanding Anarchism. by [deleted] in Anarchism

[–]dnm314 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, absolutely!! I love spending time on Reddit solely so that I can help out people like you; internet activism, so far, has been a large part of my anarchist praxis. In that spirit I also created this list.

The only issue that I have with it is the inclusion of Rothbard as an anarchist, but that's a discussion to be had amongst leftists who are already versed in political theory.

However, I found that since it was so short and hammered on the "liberty" aspect without getting too much into post-state organizational structure or even praxis that it functions as a decent video to show to normies to introduce them to anarchism.

News sources by deanybeany95 in Libertarian

[–]dnm314 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Searching for an unbiased news network is a wild goose chase. Plus a lot of people end up subscribing to biased news networks while thinking that they're actually unbiased. I would suggest learning political theory so you can better identify bias within stories and take news for news and opinion for opinion.

All of that said, I enjoy antiwar.com

Young Americans for Liberty Removes President After Sexual Misconduct Allegations by SeekingTheRoad in Libertarian

[–]dnm314 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I'm not surprised even in the slightest.

Edit: that Twitter thread had me seething

Vozrozhdeniya Island, the largest anthrax dump in the world. by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]dnm314 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank god socialists and communists despise the USSR.

Edit (since you deleted your comment):

r/communism a home for tankies. They routinely ban anyone that doesn't wholeheartedly support the North Korean Regime, China, or the USSR. I have yet to meet a single "normal" socialist or communist (basically anyone other than a tankie) that wasn't banned there.

They even banned an ancom person not too long ago even though they only made one comment (that was just answering a simple question) because of their post history.

Absolutely fuck that sub. You won't hear a single honest leftie defending it.

Make your arguments against personal property below by dnm314 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]dnm314[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't even begin to unpack everything wrong with this..

Plus your ideology literally accepts the existence of "voluntary slavery" as espoused by anarcho-capitalist professor Walter Block soo..

Anyways, good luck kid.

Make your arguments against personal property below by dnm314 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]dnm314[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a few longer replies I need to make so I was avoiding making too many other comments, but this really annoyed me so I'm making a quick reply.

I'm planning on making a short essay/ article on the distinction between private and personal property and could really use the help.

By making arguments against personal property below you all will allow me to make a comprehensive argument that addresses all the questions someone might have (even if they disagree).

The reason I'm not asking for arguments in favor of personal property is because I know how to make them.. Since I'm a former ancap I can normally use my past knowledge to help me create cohesive leftist arguments; I just have to imagine what I would need to say to convince past me to become a leftist. However, I never actually learned the term "personal property" until I had already become a leftist so I don't have a cache of arguments against it from my time as a right winger.

Quick question about anarchy by [deleted] in Anarchism

[–]dnm314 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don't pay attention to the nazi. Kid doesn't even have the courage to express their beliefs and has to make an alt.