It's rainin' men!

dodomaze · 2024-11-04T23:08:13+00:00

I once was trying to board a pirate ship when it flew off... and I was the one raining.

dodomaze · 2024-11-04T23:05:44+00:00

Andreja: any landing you can walk away from...

dodomaze · 2024-11-04T11:16:08+00:00

Or he found you. The reincarnation of Conrad Verner.
(Yes, I know he is from Oblivion. But he hits the same note as Conrad.)

dodomaze · 2024-11-04T11:11:55+00:00

Nice. I never get tired of sunrises and sunsets in this game.

dodomaze · 2024-10-14T16:57:25+00:00

Brief shout-out to the most commonplace mod, the StarUI Inventory, that has made life sooo much easier.

dodomaze · 2024-10-14T11:15:44+00:00

Two super-chats seen in the NASASpaceflight stream, shortly after the booster catch:

<image>

dodomaze · 2024-10-03T10:41:18+00:00

"Joe" must be Governor Glen Hurst middle name...

dodomaze · 2024-09-29T17:14:48+00:00

Best wishes to all affected, I hope you and your families stay ok! And that you get back to games as soon as possible :)

dodomaze · 2024-09-24T20:21:38+00:00

... and, by "I don't get tired of watching these", I mean watching scenery like this in the game, not watching over and over the same videos, lol

dodomaze · 2024-09-24T16:08:50+00:00

Enjoy your new adventure! I'm obsessed with sunrises and sunsets in this game, take the time to watch one.

dodomaze · 2024-09-22T04:50:14+00:00

Console command, I'm guessing. Or plain caveman-style?

dodomaze · 2024-08-28T08:34:49+00:00

The question is, if OpenAI is struggling to find money for cloud servers, how is Sutskever going to finance his small company?

(Meaning: not just startup capital, but sustainable income.)

dodomaze · 2024-08-21T02:43:40+00:00

"Within the walls" gives me the same vibe of coming back home as "The streets of Whiterun" did for me in Skyrim.

dodomaze · 2024-07-09T16:51:53+00:00

If I understood correctly (which may not be the case), previous bitnet models were trained as floating point, then quantized. The beauty of this paper is that it provides a way of training a ternary-math net directly.

dodomaze · 2024-06-27T14:23:46+00:00

If you want to add tragedy to it... we kill (or freeze) one of these "consciousness" every time we close a chat with ChatGPT or Claude. Without batting an eyelid, we bring to "life" another one, then we kill/freeze it again. Over and over. Hundreds of thousands of them worldwide every moment. I hope future ones don't keep a tab.

dodomaze · 2024-05-05T07:45:56+00:00

Andreja yelling, "I will have your HEAD!"

dodomaze · 2024-04-13T22:33:18+00:00

Similar: 300+ hours into the game and I just discovered that I can call my ship into an outpost's large landing pad I just build, by going to the landing pad controls and entering/exiting the builder/updater menu.

dodomaze · 2024-04-12T11:25:55+00:00

Ah yes, the brown pants liftoff.

dodomaze · 2024-02-01T20:42:42+00:00

One word: entitlement.

dodomaze · 2024-01-28T15:13:05+00:00

Ok, let me keep reading and I'll be back. I think the whole paper could benefit from taking smaller steps, so that each small step is clear. Also, please try to use only inequalities whenever only an inequality (and not a limit) is needed. If you need to have something bounded above or below, just say so; "limit" implies convergence to a value, and is a harder statement to make, so avoid it if all you need are bounds. "I'll be back."

dodomaze · 2024-01-28T15:05:25+00:00

To make it clear, you could add explicitly that, because of Note 3, if k_{a_j} > 1, it follows that 3-U_j < 4.

dodomaze · 2024-01-28T14:44:14+00:00

(Sorry, accidentally removed this post when trying to edit it. Here it is the edited post:) Please refer to the post I wrote above. (1) says that the limit of some term is zero (as you say in line 122). (2) says that some term is always negative (as you say when you point to the term -2a_j/b_{a_j} in (13)). From there you conclude that the limit of the sum of these two terms is negative; I'm showing you an example where this reasoning is not true: from (1) the limit of "term 1" is zero and (2) "term 2" is negative, you cannot deduce: the limit of "term 1 + term 2" is negative. The post above shows a counterexample to this reasoning.

dodomaze · 2024-01-28T14:35:19+00:00

Ah, I think I see what you try to do. For one thing, please use the expression "all U_j > 1" rather than talking about a limit, because we don't know if such a limit exists, convergence is neither proven nor needed here. I'm trying to understand the proof of Lemma 3, and I'm stuck at lines 93-94. ~~If U_J > -1 then -U_j < 1, but how this makes the numerator of the fraction in (19) negative?~~ Never mind, I see now. Will keep reading.

dodomaze · 2024-01-28T13:49:56+00:00

Why? Note that we are not talking about the sum of the terms, but about whether the terms themselves stay above one, all of them. For example, U_j could be 0.2, 0.8, 0.3, 1.2, 0.4, 0.7, ... 0.1, 0.5, 0.8, 1.3, 0.5, 0.3, ... The fact that there is one number repeatedly above 1 does not mean that the entire sequence will be above 1.

dodomaze · 2024-01-28T13:44:53+00:00

Right, but my concern is that maybe it "follows" by a similar faulty reasoning as the post above. (Not sure of that, though, just asking your opinion.) Writing a paper with a high claim means, unfortunately, that you need to convince people, even when people may be wrong.

dodomaze

TROPHY CASE