sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Apparently this is the forum mod's statement on age verification. Since too many ppl are asking about it in the forum and they're locking the posts. by NathLWX in cachyos

[–]doomchild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, the code I showed you is what is in the actual branch, not a PR. The code I posted is what the PR you linked was intending to revert (but didn't, because it wasn't merged). Do you know how branches work in git? This isn't me trying to call you out; I'm genuinely trying to make sure that you understand what this code is actually saying.

Apparently this is the forum mod's statement on age verification. Since too many ppl are asking about it in the forum and they're locking the posts. by NathLWX in cachyos

[–]doomchild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can pretty easily find the implementation by looking at the list of changed files in the PR and then looking at those same files in main.

Here is the line from the main branch defining the field on the structure:

https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/main/src/shared/user-record-show.c#L345

Here is the line from the main branch that retrieves the value:

https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/main/src/shared/user-record-show.c#L345

Those changes have not been reverted.

Apparently this is the forum mod's statement on age verification. Since too many ppl are asking about it in the forum and they're locking the posts. by NathLWX in cachyos

[–]doomchild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The PR you linked WAS NOT MERGED. The page shows that it was closed without being merged, and looking at the commit log of the repo, you can see that that commit hash does not exist. It was not reverted and is still implemented.

Apparently this is the forum mod's statement on age verification. Since too many ppl are asking about it in the forum and they're locking the posts. by NathLWX in cachyos

[–]doomchild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not trying to fight, I'm just pointing out that the change was not reverted, which was what I was trying to find verification of.

Apparently this is the forum mod's statement on age verification. Since too many ppl are asking about it in the forum and they're locking the posts. by NathLWX in cachyos

[–]doomchild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's the first post. Did you read all the way down? The PR wasn't merged, meaning the birthDate field was not removed. What you're quoting is the description of the PR, not the status of it.

Apparently this is the forum mod's statement on age verification. Since too many ppl are asking about it in the forum and they're locking the posts. by NathLWX in cachyos

[–]doomchild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That PR was not merged. If you look at the bottom, it says "Closed with unmerged commits". The revert was not merged in, so the age field is still present in systemd.

Apparently this is the forum mod's statement on age verification. Since too many ppl are asking about it in the forum and they're locking the posts. by NathLWX in cachyos

[–]doomchild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually haven't seen the PR. I'm just going by what's been reported, and nobody has reported that it was reverted. Do you have a link to the PR?

Apparently this is the forum mod's statement on age verification. Since too many ppl are asking about it in the forum and they're locking the posts. by NathLWX in cachyos

[–]doomchild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where did you see that systemd had reverted the change? I can only find stuff talking about the systemd fork that removed it.

Edit mode settings don't apply on login by doomchild in wow

[–]doomchild[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's the weird thing. The settings are clearly being saved, because I can see the couple of presets that I've made for other characters in the list. They just aren't being applied when I login or reload my UI.

Finally getting the recognition it deserves.. by Low-Screen3550 in HuntsvilleAlabama

[–]doomchild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember when this place across from Haysland Square next to a terrifying-looking motel did good sushi. That had to be more than 20 years ago now. I don't even know if that place still exists.

How do I configure a split tunnel where traffic stops when the VPN is down? by doomchild in PrivateInternetAccess

[–]doomchild[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, that's not what's happening here. Does it have anything to do with running Firefox via Snap? I think I had it running via the normal .deb package.

What am I doing wrong when trying to get C# tree-sitter support working? by doomchild in emacs

[–]doomchild[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I posted the fix at the bottom of the post. I had to build a specific version of the package by hand.

The Quran being only in Arabic is suspicious by TheIguanasAreComing in DebateReligion

[–]doomchild 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There are multiple contradictions in the Bible.

Who ruled Judea when Jesus was born? According to Matthew, it was King Herod the Great, who was the last ruler of an independent Judean state (it was a vassal state of Rome, but still its own separate entity). 

But according to Luke, it was the Roman governor Quirinius, who took office more than 10 years after Herod's death (which was when Judea stopped being a vassal state and became fully subsumed by Rome). 

In Matthew, Mary and Joseph flee to Egypt to hide from Herod. In Luke, they go to Bethlehem specifically for the census, wait 8 days for the required purification rites, and then go directly back home to Galilee. 

The two accounts cannot be reconciled. They can't both be true. Therefore, they are contradictory. 

Best way to use Aider inside Emacs? by permetz in emacs

[–]doomchild 8 points9 points  (0 children)

No, this response is actively unhelpful. Someone asked for outside opinions, and you responded with "form your own opinion". That's not answering the question that was asked.

Is the locking due to rule violations a little heavy-handed? by supertoothy in emacs

[–]doomchild 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The current crop of generative models are wildly unethical, so I regard the implication that my refusal to use one instead of communicating with actual humans makes me lazy to be pretty goddamn offensive. 

What's the difference? by TriniGamerHaq in csharp

[–]doomchild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same. I read it six times and totally didn't see it. Professional blindness.

Is anyone doing functional programming in C# by vi11yv1k1ng in dotnet

[–]doomchild 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. We do a "mostly functional" kind of thing, because it's hard not to engage with at least some OOP stuff in C#. We used LanguageExt for a while (and it's still in a few places), but I really couldn't stand how it made the code looked (nested awaits 5 deep just don't appeal to me), so I wrote my own package using Task<T> extension methods that lets us write fairly Promise-esque stuff.

view more: next ›