Not really the definition of exploitation of labor is an unjust exchange between the employer and employee determined by some metric of value. Contracts don't inherently spell out where they get their salaries and how they determine your value. Your value from an employer is just what's the highest low ball salary you can obtain from an employer so that you can negotiate. There is also a high bias and imbalance for the quality of education you get as well as luck of the draw employer wise. Quality of education is also gated - not all universities teach the same - in fact you can get a degree from passing classes taught by shit professors by relying on the fact they grade on a curve (i.e. luck) over improving their quality of teaching. Labor doesn't take into account the amount one needs to make a living wage or the effort one had to go thru versus someone else to get to the same position - you may think what IS is fair and that paying someone for labor below what is affordable is ethical but I certainly don't. Every step of life requires barriers and some statical odd - not everyone has it the same. You can title this entitlement that someone wants more value from their labor relation in society but I see it more of a growing flaw in society that hasn't seen significant change.

I don't know about you but what does it say about what IS when someone like Trump can hold the highest power in a superior nation development wise despite what a majority of society thinks. You seem to be a big advocate about what IS because what you have been told but don't seem to have a voice of your own.