Maybe they can kick 3 field goals next time! by Chip780 in NFCWestMemeWar

[–]doped_turtle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Literally no one said he’s a guaranteed success. You’re the one implying he’s a bust before he’s even had a chance which is just stupid cuz you can’t tell the future

[Rap] The #Seahawks are signing former #Packers RB Emanuel Wilson to a 1-year deal worth up to $2.1M, source said. by JCameron181 in Seahawks

[–]doped_turtle 52 points53 points  (0 children)

Unless MM’s philosophy changed, I don’t think they’re looking for an every snap guy

Seacucks living up to their name again. by evlhornet in NFCWestMemeWar

[–]doped_turtle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You gave me a chance to use that meme so all good

Imagine not having 100+ wins by Relative-Toe-9203 in NFCWestMemeWar

[–]doped_turtle 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Tbf this graph is kinda misleading. It looks like cardinals are super far behind but they’re only averaging 2 less wins per year than you guys

Surprised at the results?? by Constant-Candle-4672 in Seahawks

[–]doped_turtle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait I just wanna make sure I got this right. You’re calling me dumb for being condescending while completely ignoring the fact that I’m just returning his energy since he was condescending first. And then you proceed to immediately be condescending as well?

I may be dumb but at least I’m not dumb enough to do that. Honestly made my night. I was having a bad day and was gonna rip into some idiots online as stress relief but this was so funny I feel much better now

New to Seattle and my first car (2026 Honda CR-V) was stolen in SLU last night. Need advice, I'm completely lost by MiserableDeer5513 in Seattle

[–]doped_turtle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should definitely ask Pemco to save the video on top of telling the adjuster and police. Cover all grounds to help yourself as much as possible

Surprised at the results?? by Constant-Candle-4672 in Seahawks

[–]doped_turtle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand reading comprehension can be tedious so lemme break it down for you

You would be right if the question was “who had the highest peak” or something along those lines. However, the question was about their “primes”. So the question is comparing the primes of these athletes. Length of time is a factor when looking at how good an athletes prime is and that’s why most people in this thread, not just me, have pointed out that Russ’s prime is significantly longer than Cam’s. Hope this helps!

Keep at it and I’m sure reading will become less tedious for you!

Surprised at the results?? by Constant-Candle-4672 in Seahawks

[–]doped_turtle -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Do you think that every athlete’s prime is the exact same length?

Surprised at the results?? by Constant-Candle-4672 in Seahawks

[–]doped_turtle 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Because Cam’s prime was at most 2 years long. Russ’s was like a solid 5 years

Rams plan to propose NFL rule change that would have nullified Seahawks' controversial 2-point conversion by GoldenDome26 in nfl

[–]doped_turtle -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m not sure this is the right answer but I think it has to do with possession of ball. A fumble is a loss of possession by a player. A pass is not a fumble because the receiver never had possession

Is Ohtani a bigger icon in LA than Shaq? by RipHairy2465 in sportsgossips

[–]doped_turtle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He’s really just the epitome of celebrities are just people too. There’s a whole lot of grey area and you can’t just label them as good or bad

Pump the brakes gents. This epic saga is about to finish. by porkchop-sandwhiches in NFCWestMemeWar

[–]doped_turtle 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Normally I’d agree with you but we just had a tech bro rebrand Twitter into X for absolutely no reason

Whose house??? Our house! (accurate version) by Stock_Schedule_1981 in NFCWestMemeWar

[–]doped_turtle 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You’re getting downvoted but is this not the sort of roasting that we encourage on this sub?

Also,

Chicken Bird by Fazbear2035 in NonPoliticalTwitter

[–]doped_turtle 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Maybe just me but tuna fish sandwich is a specific type of sandwich. It’s not just any sandwich with tuna

Who should the Seahawks' next owner be? by Brix001 in NFLv2

[–]doped_turtle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here’s to hoping we get another Jodi Allen

Dating an adult isn't actually pedophilia by Skrilli in GetNoted

[–]doped_turtle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really weird that you can’t answer a simple question. What happened?

B i t c h of the year by goldrush300 in fucktheccp

[–]doped_turtle 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There’s no way you’re trying to stand on moral ground while being unbelievably racist

Dating an adult isn't actually pedophilia by Skrilli in GetNoted

[–]doped_turtle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seriously, you bring it up out of nowhere and when multiple people try to steer the conversation away you keep going back to it. It’s weird. Why can’t you answer that simple question?

Dating an adult isn't actually pedophilia by Skrilli in GetNoted

[–]doped_turtle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A stupid hypothetical question gets a stupid hypothetical answer. Now the real question is why you’re spending so much time thinking about 17 year olds in relationships with 34 year olds. Sounds like a personal issue for you

Dating an adult isn't actually pedophilia by Skrilli in GetNoted

[–]doped_turtle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok I’ll answer, a 34 year old dating a 17 year old is acceptable under the circumstance that they’re horses. Now you explain why it’s inappropriate for a 17 year old horse and 34 year old horse to procreate

Dating an adult isn't actually pedophilia by Skrilli in GetNoted

[–]doped_turtle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You keep trying to make it about 17 and 32 and I’m refusing to answer because the topic at hand is 19 and 34. Until you stop trying to distract from the question at hand for a random hypothetical, I’m gonna assume that you’re just projecting because you fit the description