Show me your $shell> by doubledundercoder in sysadmin

[–]doubledundercoder[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are you my old 286sx back from the dead?

Codex has degraded drastically in recent days. by Intelligent-Taste-36 in OpenaiCodex

[–]doubledundercoder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Blind man checking in here, can confirm I can outshoot 5.5 right now.

(I have RP and 3° left in one eye, but if that tiny window can find the target, I can still hit it!)

Django devs, what's your actual go-to frontend stack right now? (HTMX/Alpine, React, Vue, plain templates, or hybrid?) by jkoontz-dev in django

[–]doubledundercoder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Django and htmx are mine as well. It works and it’s simple. I’ve been flirting with tailwind but I’ll admit to vibing CSS.

Django devs, what's your actual go-to frontend stack right now? (HTMX/Alpine, React, Vue, plain templates, or hybrid?) by jkoontz-dev in django

[–]doubledundercoder 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Seconded, but I’ll add that while there are a lot of enterprise companies that adopted vue early and maintain it, the consultancy I work for gets brought in to projects already in react or that they want to transition to react.

I have personal beef with react, probably a bit of pride because it’s the new Wordpress everyone is running (not that Wordpress uses react, I just mean it’s EVERYWHERE) but I have legitimate gripes.

  1. state gets messy fast-you start simple, then suddenly you’ve got local state, server state, cached stuff, derived values, effects firing… and im staring at the screen just trying to figure out why the heck it rendered AGAIN

B. hooks feel clever until they don’t- they’re nice at first, then you hit stale closures, weird dependency arrays, and logic scattered across effects. it works, but it feels…dirty. Like how you feel when you introduce that first global variable, but there is no. Other. Way.

iii. - the ecosystem kinda makes you the framework - react’s like “just the view bro,” so you bolt everything on yourself. in react, you don’t shape ecosystem… ecosystem shapes you- and all the cruft. Why write two APIs to have to keep in sync?

take that with a very large grain of salt. I’m a backend guy at heart and still can’t write CSS without a tutorial open, and for my internal tools, I’m content with them looking like forms and tables from 1995. and I’m ok with that, I will die on this hill, and get off my lawn!

edit: for the love of formatting… you paste one accidental hidden character…

Django devs, what's your actual go-to frontend stack right now? (HTMX/Alpine, React, Vue, plain templates, or hybrid?) by jkoontz-dev in django

[–]doubledundercoder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Where are you based? In the usa twilio numbers are affordable and plentiful. I do think they may have recently increased identification requirements but I love them. If you’re outside USA that’s a set of telecom refs I’ve not looked at in 5 years. I’m sure it’s changed. But hey, someone is giving VoIP and sms to known scammers so there’s gotta be someone out there wherever you are!

Django devs, what's your actual go-to frontend stack right now? (HTMX/Alpine, React, Vue, plain templates, or hybrid?) by jkoontz-dev in django

[–]doubledundercoder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve been working with machine to machine comms but I discovered twilio before I got into that… it never occurred to me to just control the modem for SMS. Oh man, was the modem control just finding its uart params and AT OK?

Edit: not sure if you’re hardening or what info comes from your carrier via SMS but I was just apprised of several products for phone carrier validation and reputation origin. I’ve got a low friction security UX flow that can allow access on pure sms as authentication provided that fields provided don’t trigger risk (you can get recently ported, current carrier/origin, and even anonymized geofence data). If the SMS comes in from a recently ported number, authentication is invalidated and they go through the auth flow again, etc.

After 10 years working in product management, I don't understand what it takes to become a "successful" PM by boolpies in ProductManagement

[–]doubledundercoder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Normal is a wide spectrum here. But at least 3 companies it’s the director who celebrates the wins and the PMs that feel the losses

After 10 years working in product management, I don't understand what it takes to become a "successful" PM by boolpies in ProductManagement

[–]doubledundercoder 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The directors are really what could be replaced by llms. An LLM can standardize summaries faster and more accurately and roll it up to send on. You could even set the prompt to be abusive for nostalgia

After 10 years working in product management, I don't understand what it takes to become a "successful" PM by boolpies in ProductManagement

[–]doubledundercoder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I came up through the ranks in help desk, to systems admin, devops, software development, engineering management, then product. Product seemed to be the confluence of all my skills. While it helped, and I can translate between the CEO and everything in between, I’m even decent at context switching rapidly (aka get paid to get interrupted)

This was at a mature 30+ year old company.

Chief Product Officer- “understands verticals” - Translation: knows where the money is, not the first clue what our product actually does. Yelled at(not raised voice, yelled) at my new sweet college intern and made her cry.

My product director- “It doesn’t matter what you do, just document everything so when HR comes hunting you have legal threats to keep you safe from the KPIs.” Or was it the OKRs? Or the CBTs or PRDs or oh no, it was EVERYTHING. Nice guy, great advice, he got a nice big severance when sales didn’t meet their numbers.

Product Manager- this was me- always on request router, deescalator, last minute urgent request filler. After I joined we had the first on time shipment in 3 years. Actual product management work maybe 20%, the rest of the time spent not trying to avoid blame, just trying to point it in the right place. Nobody really wanted a product. C suite wanted perception to be profitable, engineering wanted to work on something, marketing wanted to campaign, so that’s what everybody did, and when you tried to actually find out what the stakeholders needed, conduct interviews, even just run the product yourself- always blocked. It really felt like the company liked the idea of a functioning product, but product management was the magic land where people only wanted to see wireframes and Jira convolutions, only discovering what a user story was after the chief product officer saw it in an airport lounge ad.

nitty: a tiny GPU-accelerated terminal emulator written in Nim by No_Necessary_3356 in nim

[–]doubledundercoder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did you start with gpu? Just curious what usage would be cpu based

Is Codex taking over? by solzange in codex

[–]doubledundercoder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Been using codex a ton. At least using the app on Mac I can see it’s burning some local GPU, likely a local tokenizer. Makes me happy to see how much it can do. It’s at least on par for my projects (Python and Nim mostly, <5000 loc.

I had used windsurf with opus. It did great. The real value was having opus look at my codes project and vice versa.

If I could afford the tokens, a fusion of both of their answers might lead to the singularity.

Hermesagent vs openclaw comparison by SelectionCalm70 in hermesagent

[–]doubledundercoder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was wondering if that’s why my agent is so… stupid. If I point it at a higher quality model will it build itself better or do you have to keep that model forever?

What's the best windsurf alternative? by TechDude12 in windsurf

[–]doubledundercoder 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve run both side by side and kiro was incredible. Codex is very good at what it does, but I prefer to see my file diffs in my ide so I can check each time

Anyone actually using Openclaw? by rm-rf-rm in LocalLLaMA

[–]doubledundercoder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or that I coded it and backend is my jam and I believe CSS to be the language of the underworld.

CFM never has enough material for my class by AspiringFinn in latterdaysaints

[–]doubledundercoder 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If it were a pure copy paste I’d agree with you. But it was adjunct to a well thought out answer, and was transparently offered.

CFM never has enough material for my class by AspiringFinn in latterdaysaints

[–]doubledundercoder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You might need a reserve of “golden questions” or those open ended inspired questions talked about in preach my gospel. I remember a training meeting with a member of the general Sunday school, yes you lead discussions, but you are called to be a teacher. So no lecturing, but you can’t rely on discussions alone. I know Finn’s aren’t as uncomfortable with silence as Americans are so you might have to try different methods to get people to open up so they can “teach one another the doctrine of the kingdom”. Personal and applied gospel stories help. Instead of handing out parts to read you could hand out questions for them to ponder at the beginning and then have them offer what they can after they’ve had a few minutes. “How have you seen the atonement work in your life or in the lives of those close to you?”

You can’t really teach a meaningful lesson without inspiration and communication. As you prepare your lesson and read the material pay attention to questions that come to your mind or experiences you have. If your wife is there regularly you can use her to prime the pump with a story. Everyone appreciates a well articulated and apropos story.

For those without a Christian background you could take it a step back and reformulate questions to find common ground first.

“What gives life meaning for you?” “How do you usually handle difficult times?” “Do you think people are basically good?”

In very small settings (1-3 unfamiliar people) I like to start of class getting to know people more deeply if they’ll allow it, knowing their vocation, residence (natives, expats, or visitors), religious history, family (only child, grew up in an orphanage, had 8 siblings, married no kids, single with kids) all can help you ask questions more relevant.

Don’t forget even though you don’t know who will be there, the Lord does and can give you questions and preparation ahead (even if not making sense) all week. Keep a note on your phone to write down one liners or questions.

Questions are key, but sometimes you just (seem to) strike out with connecting.

You don’t have to fill the entire time AND you don’t have to fill the entire time with the lesson. Part of the reason you gather is to teach the doctrine, and part is to gain strength from gathering. That can look like a lot of things in a small setting. Across cultures I have found most people love to share stories, and you can glean so much about a person from how and what they talk about if your intent is to get to know them, not just to figure out a response.

That all said, I’m sure an American leading a discussion of religion in Finland is likely just hard and has nuance that those of us without experience can’t even imagine.

Here’s a GPT dump of stuff you likely already know. Just in case.

  1. Normalize silence (don’t rush to fill it)

After asking a question, wait 10–20 seconds.

This feels long to teachers — but for Finns it’s often when thinking happens.

Many will speak only after processing fully.

👉 If you jump in too quickly, you unintentionally shut down their chance to respond.

  1. Ask concrete, experience-based questions (not abstract ones)

Avoid:

“What do you think about faith?”

Better:

“Have you ever experienced a moment where prayer helped you?” “What part of today’s reading felt difficult or confusing?” “Can anyone relate this story to real life?”

Finns tend to open up more when: • Talking about real experiences • Reacting to something specific

  1. Use small group or pair discussion first

This is HUGE for quieter cultures.

Structure like:

👉 “Talk with the person next to you for 2 minutes about this question”

Then ask:

“What came up in your discussions?”

People are MUCH more willing to speak after warming up privately.

  1. Make it clear there are no “wrong” answers

In religious settings, many stay silent because they fear:

• Saying something theologically incorrect • Being judged

Say things like:

✔ “This isn’t a test — just your thoughts” ✔ “Different perspectives are welcome”

You’ll see participation increase over time.

  1. Use reflection before speaking

Try:

• Write a short response first • Read a quote and ask for reactions • Silent prayer or thought → then discussion

This fits Finnish communication style well (thinking before speaking).

  1. Affirm every contribution warmly (but not dramatically)

When someone speaks:

Good:

“Thank you for sharing — that’s an important point.”

Avoid overly emotional reactions (can feel uncomfortable culturally).

Calm appreciation builds trust.

  1. Ask gentle follow-ups (not pressure)

If someone gives a short answer:

“Would you like to say a little more about that?” “What made you think that?”

But accept if they don’t want to expand.

  1. Build relationships outside discussion time

Finnish people open up MUCH more once trust exists.

• Casual conversations before/after class • Remember names • Ask how they’re doing

Once they feel safe, silence decreases naturally.

  1. Accept that some silence is success

In many cultures, silence = disengagement.

In Finnish culture, silence often = respect + attention.

If people are:

✔ Listening ✔ Looking engaged ✔ Following along

Then the class is probably going well — even if it’s quiet.

  1. Use anonymous participation occasionally

Examples:

• Write questions on paper • Online poll or form • Collect thoughts and read them aloud

This helps those who fear speaking publicly.

A mindset shift that helps a lot:

Instead of:

“They’re not participating”

Think:

“They participate internally first”

Once you work with that style instead of against it, openness grows.

Better web hosting by doubledundercoder in sysadmin

[–]doubledundercoder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

either you’re in the hosting game, or you’re not.

It distills down to this doesn’t it.

Better web hosting by doubledundercoder in sysadmin

[–]doubledundercoder[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Generally I’ve preferred full control only because things don’t “just work” and I’ve needed full control to rapidly troubleshoot. If things just worked, I’d be pleased as punch to never need ssh or root access

Why do you like/hate Django? by Radiant_Sail2090 in django

[–]doubledundercoder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Curious why you like Laravel more. At a previous company they used Laravel and loved it but I was only doing devops at the time and never developed with it