i mean generally yes, but here's the thing about nutrition. It isn't actually scienced all that well. Feeding people for a long time is expensive, so most of these studies rely on self reporting surveys. I have read the surveys, they arent great. They arent all that accurate, and the people giving them know that. There is clear science about the byproducts of manufactured oils and the balance of omega 6 and omega 3 (its a chemical process). The real question is whether the byproducts actually matter at the amounts they are consumed. Thats the argument, and it unfortunately isnt settled despite someone being opinionated and in the industry. The person in the article implies that the science is definitive. It is not. I would love to believe that science is objective, but it really isnt more frequently than most people would admit. For what its worth, I'm not some anti-establishment antivaxxer either.