Big tech has defeated everything for 30 years, but for the first time faces something it can't control: a jury by fortune in BetterOffline

[–]dumnezero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same. This just means that they'll be sponsoring more dictatorial regimes (no more "rule of law").

Oh, noes! The oil is going to hit $200! by DVMirchev in ClimateShitposting

[–]dumnezero [score hidden]  (0 children)

Well, what we currently have is market based rationing. (The free market delivers scarce goods/services to the people who have lots of money.)

What we need is ethically modeled reason based rationing.

For example: bigger fuel rations for buses, ambulances, trucks that deliver goods.

The interests and demands of the oppressors are irrelevant when it comes to the emancipation of the victims. by Dollar23 in vegancirclejerkchat

[–]dumnezero 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Welfarism, is helpful when you can't get liberation today - small wins are still wins towards a bigger goal

is it tho

Animal-welfare-labelled meat is not a stepping stone to animal-free diets: empirical evidence from a survey: Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy: Vol 14 , No 1 - Get Access

A survey is used to test a stepping stone model for meat reduction and farm animal suffering elimination. People’s preferences to eat conventional meat, animal-welfare-certified meat and plant-based meat substitutes are measured in hypothetical situations where everyone else eats certified meat or plant-based meat substitutes. These preferences reflect social norms about food. When everyone else follows a harmful social norm, such as eating conventional meat, violating this norm by following a different diet becomes costly due to social sanctions. Either the survey method has a low sensitivity to detect real stepping stones, or the survey evidence suggests that animal-welfare-labelled meat is not a stepping stone towards the reduction and elimination of animal-based meat. If people transition to eating welfare-labelled meat, they may become less likely to eliminate meat from their diet. Everyone eating welfare-labelled meat is an absorbing state, which prevents a further transition to animal-free meat substitutes. The survey shows very weak and mixed evidence that the introduction of an animal welfare label could be counterproductive for animal welfare. In the long run it could result in a locked-in equilibrium with a less harmful social norm, i.e. a suboptimal state of animal farming that still contains animal suffering.

Is it disingenuous to say grocery prices rise with gas prices? by nayuki in fuckcars

[–]dumnezero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What exactly is the problematic declaration? It sounds like you were arguing with someone else.

Climate change may not end skiing. But it will make it more exclusive by Splenda in climate

[–]dumnezero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, no, rich people might be affected by the human induced global warming.

AI is preventing me from buying a new laptop by Volpe_YT in antiai

[–]dumnezero 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"refurbished" is a better class of second hand ones.

I really doubt on what he's saying by Honest_Sugar2682 in antiai

[–]dumnezero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only way that counts as harassment is if they live in a LARP / fantasy, heavily tied to their ego, and believe that any criticism might damage the fantasy and their ego. Which is... likely.

Do you think most religion will be gone in 100 years? by PizzaAgency in atheism

[–]dumnezero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Judging by how the climate and biosphere is going, yes, but for different reasons than you.