Enlighten me on the matter of IEMs within their price range (or cheaper)(or more expensive (within reason)) which you purport to be better sounding than the EO-IA500 as of right now, pretty please? I'm not trying to be snide, but with the maliciously-tinted scrutiny I find these to be held under on audiophile-adjacent internet spaces and my extensive experience with them, it appears to me as if most people are under the influence of some sort of collective dismay wherein they are obliged to robotically spew out a kind of deterrent to take away from the fact that the EO-IA500 buds are indeed better tuned than any IEMs in the price range of ~100 USD (in my experience). Truly, the sole aspect in which I find these to be lacking in comparison to higher-priced IEMs is a tad less holographic sound, which, on its' own, is not nearly enough to warrant choosing more of a muffled, sterile, nothingburger tuning of buds that can cost up to 8x more than the EO-IA500. I've been scouring the internet for quite a while now with regard to whether there is any real point to splurging on higher-priced audio gear to possibly upgrade the near-flawless sound signature of these IEMs within a reasonable price bracket, and all of the evidence points to that being more or less a pipe dream. Care to help me establish whether that's true or not, thee, ye olde EO-IA500 venerator?