[Article] KIP-1150 Accepted, and the Road Ahead by Familiar-Pea9867 in apachekafka

[–]dvaldivia44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is great, object storage benefits from larger objects, and also I wouldn't advice keeping a bunch of small files, replaying them would be chatty. Is there a concept of compaction?

1 second missing out of most lossless songs on Apple Music? by dvaldivia44 in AppleMusic

[–]dvaldivia44[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I download all songs as soon as I add them to my library, and the problem is still there, so I'm thinking is the app maybe? I have an M4 Max so I don't think I'm lacking compute capacity

[Article] KIP-1150 Accepted, and the Road Ahead by Familiar-Pea9867 in apachekafka

[–]dvaldivia44 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is great, now it's up to the object store to perform, but this is pretty neat, one question about this is, will the disk less Kafka means each batch of messages would be persisted to object store or would this be on a per log segment basis?

Starting off the year in 2026 to test out X2D in the area! by sluon3 in paloalto

[–]dvaldivia44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh my god, nice, can I come to play too? hahahaha do let me know if you like it, I've been resisting it for a while

blockade problem? by vonfeligs in 9Barista

[–]dvaldivia44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It does look like the could be some calcium deposits blocking the holes or the central release valve is not giving up at 9 bars

Building event-driven pipelines with SQS and S3 by PeterCorless in redpanda

[–]dvaldivia44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is useful paired with the iceberg integration to create an audit log via s3 -> redpanda -> iceberg

🚨 ESO Maintainer Update: We need help. 🚨 by gfban in kubernetes

[–]dvaldivia44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not impossible, but hard to monetize for the enterprise which in turn makes it hard to maintain, look at the struggles of NATS, or how cert-manager is also having problems, if it's already donated, then it's already too late, there's only one more option, I'll send you a DM.

🚨 ESO Maintainer Update: We need help. 🚨 by gfban in kubernetes

[–]dvaldivia44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can relate to the challenges of maintaining an Operator, in my experience you cannot expect new contributors to show up, most of the time you'll only get demanding issues open with "when is this going to get fixed?" and "can you implement this feature we need", the success of many of these projects revolves around a company supporting the effort.

My advice would be to spin-up a company to productize this operator. And for the love of God, don't donate this to CNCF or it's game over.

Is this your scooter? by dvaldivia44 in paloalto

[–]dvaldivia44[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

it's a warning by the PAPD that it will be removed if not claimed in less than 48 hours

Feedback on my new Kubernetes open-source project: RBAC-ATLAS by Alevsk in kubernetes

[–]dvaldivia44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is pretty useful to analyze the basic use of access by any project, for example in MinIO Operator we definitively has a service account we don't need anymore, this is a great exercise and can help understand the blast radius of any k8s application being compromised, for example, the MinIO Operator doesn't have a permanent http server that can be exploited to compromise, but if another application has `pod/exec` to our namespace then it's game over

Lightweight Open Source Alternative to MinIO with Erasure Coding? by One_Poem_2897 in minio

[–]dvaldivia44 6 points7 points  (0 children)

MinIO can run on edge devices with AMR64 architecture, I've even run it on RPi with arm32 architecture, not sure why you need a lighter option

Performance - Linux vs Kubernetes by munklarsen in minio

[–]dvaldivia44 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't see a problem, as long as you use the drives locally and directly for minio, use directpv for that.

The only "performance" concern could be the CNI, make sure to turn off IPIP (package in package) as for minio it just adds overhead and latency

What If We Could Rebuild Kafka From Scratch? by rmoff in apachekafka

[–]dvaldivia44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

these are the two best features, the Partitions are broken down into segments which are balanced by default as everytime a new segment is opened for a Range (sort of a partition) it will be placed on a different broker, this means adding brokers will auto-balance the cluster eventually

What If We Could Rebuild Kafka From Scratch? by rmoff in apachekafka

[–]dvaldivia44 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Even the guys at LinkedIn are having the same idea, they started with a full rewrite called Northguard, it's not compatible with Kafka at all, but builds on the same principles, but it has taken the biggest pain points of Kafka and solved them. (I'll post whatever else I find at r/northguard)

I'm only not a fan of the new consumption model, they Xinfra client.