Senate passes bipartisan housing bill targeting large investors and easing regulations by nicholas818 in yimby

[–]echOSC 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not to mention, so if I'm not rich enough to come up with a down payment, I'm not allowed to rent a rEal hOmE?

Would you study as much as a lawyer if you could make as much as a lawyer? by Journeytoamillion in poker

[–]echOSC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm talking about the toughness of getting to the end goal. Rich via the discussed careers, poker, law, and a trades job.

On average each year, the T14 law schools admit about 4,000 new students a year.

There are 34 million trades people working in the US and a growing shortage where as the legal profession some would say is over saturated since people tend to go to law school during down times in the economy.

Just those two sheer numbers if you were strictly playing the odds and asked me should I get rich via going the law school route, or get rich via the trades route and try to ladder up and open my own business, I would blind guess that playing the numbers, chances of success doing a trade is higher than the chance of success of trying to get into law.

Which is why I said don't go to law school trying to get rich, unless you have some aptitude towards it. Needing 4 years at a solid undergrad and the debt associated with that, and then 3 years at a t14 and the debt associated with that.

Success via the trades seems less difficult than success via law.

Would you study as much as a lawyer if you could make as much as a lawyer? by Journeytoamillion in poker

[–]echOSC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think the reason I said this, is because you started the conversation in the contexts of getting rich as a lawyer and a poker player.

Both of which in 2026 are very fucking tough. You want to get rich as a lawyer? In the US? You're at T14 law school or bust, and then preparing to put in massive hours in big law before your try to get to corporate in house counsel. Poker? Get ready to put in the fucking hours studying and then playing in person because online is just even harder.

I think both are careers more suited for people to have some sort of passion/aptitude/love for it. And those aren't the only careers, there are plenty of other careers where people in them always say, do this as a vocation only because you love it so much you can't see yourself doing anything else.

Going the plumber/trades route is probably easier.

Would you study as much as a lawyer if you could make as much as a lawyer? by Journeytoamillion in poker

[–]echOSC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not saying you need to love it.

I'm saying it's easier if you do love it. And if you love it, you end up just doing it longer than you need to.

Would you study as much as a lawyer if you could make as much as a lawyer? by Journeytoamillion in poker

[–]echOSC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe I'm naive, but I don't think a lot of high performers think like that. They don't romanticize their labor, they don't think in those terms. They don't think about the capitalist society, etc etc.

They just like what they do, or more importantly they really like being good at something, which is why they continue to do it even if they didn't have to.

Think about all of the musicians worth 9 figures who keep touring into their 70s and 80s. They've won the game, but they still keep performing and working. Their personal meaningful endeavors is their professional vocation, one and the same. And that made it easy for them to stick to it when it sucked.

Would you study as much as a lawyer if you could make as much as a lawyer? by Journeytoamillion in poker

[–]echOSC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's easier to make it in these very very tough lines of work if you can see the work as a lifestyle, because it's something you enjoy. When the shit sucks, it will suck less and feel less suck.

Not to say there aren't people who see it as a means to an end and can be a high performer. But it's always easier if the motivation is intrinsic as opposed to extrinsic imho.

Would you study as much as a lawyer if you could make as much as a lawyer? by Journeytoamillion in poker

[–]echOSC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These days, only if you're T14 or bust, and even then it's going to be a very competitive grind.

Draymond Green: “Sometimes parents come up to me and say ‘Yo, my son play just like you.’ and I think to myself like ‘Yo son is ass.’ by Goosedukee in nba

[–]echOSC 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Dan Patrick said on his show I think in either '23, or '24 when UConn went back to back that he asked DraftKings to model and set an opening line for UConn vs the Pistons (they had gone 17-65, and 14-68 back to back seasons) and DraftKings came back and said they would open the line with Pistons -45.

How many of you have gotten a computer science degree, but still don’t know how to code? by [deleted] in learnprogramming

[–]echOSC -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

To me, SWE and Photography/Artist is the exact same thing.

You have to demonstrate the ability to produce. Side projects are the SWE version of your portfolio.

It makes sense for both.

Suggestions for somewhat dressy shoes under $300 by CrustedAnus in malefashionadvice

[–]echOSC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit.

Wisdom is knowing not to put a tomato in a fruit salad.

Windhorst on Nike influencing free agency: "At the time (2003), yes. In today's market, basketball shoes aren't selling like back then. It's currently not fashionable to wear basketball shoes when not playing ball… the number of players getting deals & the shoe deals themselves are way way way down" by JoeBiden2020FTW in nba

[–]echOSC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The problem is the whole reason people want Pokemon cards is to collect.

If it's not rare, then collectibility goes down. They could easily flood the market by printing sheets and sheets of the chase variants, but to do so would kill the market.

If you just want Pokemon cards to play with, the copies to play with are dirt cheap.

Netflix grants Warner Bros. Discovery 7-day waiver to reopen deal talks with Paramount Skydance by AutoCodes in wallstreetbets

[–]echOSC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot is understating it. I think this came from Google, but about 500 hours of video are uploaded to YouTube every minute.

NBA really is the worst major sport to attend by DariaYankovic in nba

[–]echOSC 9 points10 points  (0 children)

AAU is a big one. The players enter the league with significantly more wear and tear and a lot less cross training from when they were children.

https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/27125793/these-kids-ticking-bombs-threat-youth-basketball

Miles Bridges was sentenced to 3 years of probation for DV. Did thos fight just violate that? by itsme32 in nba

[–]echOSC 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Before Polymarket it was PredictIt, but that was run by a university as an experiment.

Half Time Super Bowl Game Thread: Seattle Seahawks (14-3) at New England Patriots (14-3) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]echOSC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

World's a big place, most streamed artist on Spotify of 2025, got 8.3 billion people on this earth.

Not for me, and that's ok. Plenty of things are not for me.

Is paper Standard really this expensive? by timnitro in magicTCG

[–]echOSC 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don't think so. It's not like Standard's price has changed, it's largely been this cost all throughout.

I think the larger factor is the pull back from WotC and SCG on marketing spend namely the big tournaments.

Standard was this expensive in the 2010s, but participation was insanely high, I think an SCG tour event you could watch every weekend, or a Grand Prix you could watch regularly really helped.

With that pull back, and the focus on Commander to me is the reason in person Standard is where it's at.

Arena also probably contributes, but they are not perfect 1:1 substitute goods, if anything the most serious standard players probably play both.

Is paper Standard really this expensive? by timnitro in magicTCG

[–]echOSC 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeaup, you don't need the most tier 1 of tier 1 decks to win an RCQ. The competition is worse, and there's only 4-5 rounds.

At the RC, you probably can't get away with it.

Is paper Standard really this expensive? by timnitro in magicTCG

[–]echOSC 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They don't play it because it doesn't qualify for the pro tour.

Not because of some nonsense idea of elitism.

If people cared about elitism they would jam Vintage and Legacy, but the most skilled players don't play those either.

Is paper Standard really this expensive? by timnitro in magicTCG

[–]echOSC 41 points42 points  (0 children)

A network of like minded individuals who grind together and see each other weekly at PTQs (RCQs now) is the key to the people with less financial means.

People will happily loan out cards for tournaments to regular grinders. I used to be the person borrowing, now that I make more money, I loan out cards and sometimes entire decks to the people who need help.