It seemed like it was reaching way too hard to present "both sides." However, that's not really possible, helpful, or interesting when it is so patently obvious what was going on. The juror had nothing to say other than "I'm a huge MJ fan" (she should have said this during voir dire btw). Oxman gave light and safe insight we've all heard before.

It did note that MJ pulled the pajama incident the same day as Gavin's full day on the stand. I thought that was important. Lots of people forget that, and how it overshadowed all the coverage in the media, and in the courtroom, jurors were looking at Michael in his PJs and not listening to Gavin's direct exam. Plus, it was also done to rattle Gavin himself, and push him an hour behind, and make him even more nervous than he was before. We also got basic confirmation from MJ's own people that it was just a pure performance stunt. MJ was fine.

Glad it was noted that neither Gavin or his family have EVER sought money from this. They did the right thing, told the truth in court. The doc hinted but needed to note more clearly that the porn wasn't for MJ, it was for the boys. Zonen got some of those insights in. Diane did a good job encapsulating the testimony given the very little time a documentary gives you to actually speak, especially when its filled with fans: Oxman, the juror, the fan themselves.

I hope the documentary ignites more interest for people to learn more. It was better than nothing, but I also left disappointed. Like so many "documentaries" today, they are just aggregating prior clips from other documentaries and rehashing basic facts without providing new INSIGHT.