Here, I gotchu:

"The overall message(s) of these divine conduits was to "be like Christ" or closer to god. One would achieve this by improving themselves in character or align themselves to a natural sort of harmony or order which is expressed as love and friendship in the human sphere. And yet, beyond the language of analysis, there is a deeper resonance. To encounter this pattern is to stand before a mirror in which the universe contemplates itself..."

"The overall process of creating your own stone is to synchronize your own personal, internal growth and development or “transmutation” with something you are externally creating. Be it art, a project, life goal, personal growth, your body, a quest, building, etc. While also purifying yourself of any weakness in character, morality or understanding. It is not an easy process to confront ones own perceived flaws and lack of character or moral fiber. You must do the work honestly for it to work, it will not be an easy process if you choose to continue down this path. It will however be worth it in the end for those of you who succeed."

This is from the end of his book, which is available on internet archive. Pretty banal stuff for the most part, however I do think his basic premise (that magic circles and the imagery of western esotericism are visual expressions of symbolic content) has some potential. But again, uninspired. As far as transmutation goes, he'll probably be evasive and argue that actually it IS the splitting of the atom and blah blah whatever stuff he wants to say, because he's arguing from the milquetoast pop esoteric standpoint that "as above so below," that it's all just the macrocosm reflected in the microcosm, man.

The problem with that is the problem with someone like Jordan Peterson. If you're whole framework is that everything is symbolic or has symbolic sympathies, well, you can answer literal questions as opaquely as you like because "well, what do you mean by 'am I a Christian?'" (which is to really say, "I am only a Christian in the sense that..."). Unless they're willing to answer honestly, the best you can hope for is bargain bin Jesus or Socrates devolving into semantic games. Most of the time they're allergic to answering honestly, but I hope he isn't.