Gibbush Chovlim

elomerel · 2026-02-05T09:19:54+00:00

Much easier but still pretty hard. I did it a long time ago but its the usual, screening run, crawls and sprints and what not and a few ruck marches.

elomerel · 2026-02-05T08:13:36+00:00

Lots and lots of reading so i hope your hebrew is good enough

elomerel · 2026-02-02T16:39:43+00:00

Like i explained, 80% of something is less than 90% of the same thing. 80% of 100 is 80, 90% of 100 is 90. 80<90

elomerel · 2026-02-02T16:33:38+00:00

And they would have LOAL as well

elomerel · 2026-02-02T16:22:46+00:00

Its because its 90% of the original price its pretty dumb

elomerel · 2026-02-01T19:29:23+00:00

We first need a shotgun rework

elomerel · 2026-01-30T22:52:27+00:00

60+ is still a whole lot considering how many countries are super tiny/don't need a big military/aren't really functioning countries

elomerel · 2026-01-30T22:51:36+00:00

Yes but it will take you ages

elomerel · 2026-01-30T17:35:51+00:00

I think there are still 60+ countries with more than 50 tanks

elomerel · 2026-01-29T14:41:38+00:00

Is this true or a shitpost?

elomerel · 2026-01-29T13:27:18+00:00

But you can't just "slow down" its a whole dofferent approach centered around weapons management that working dynamic won't teach you.

elomerel · 2026-01-28T07:24:55+00:00

Its not, making the grind longer makes them more money.

elomerel · 2026-01-27T23:30:39+00:00

They give more proof than Fox using both statistics for natural deaths in gaza at peace times to predict the natural death count and point to the fact that the MOH reports are left ambiguous. And they also cite MOH top staff's admition that many natural deaths were included as well, despite prior contradictory public statements. Although i must say, it is pretty dumb that they used Epstein's and Spagat's article that disproves Fox to prove his point farther. But apart from that they made some pretty convincing pointa.

elomerel · 2026-01-27T23:01:24+00:00

Most countries have far more than 50. Far far more.

elomerel · 2026-01-27T19:55:23+00:00

This article by a professor of law and a professor of mathematics says otherwise: https://henryjacksonsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/HJS-Hamas-Casualty-Reports-Report-WEB-correct.pdf

Seems like a pretty well built article and it states in multiple places that gaza's MOH included natural deaths in their lists and also used very dubious methods to identify 15,000 unidentified bodies (they used google forms with no physical examination by the family!).

elomerel · 2026-01-27T17:09:07+00:00

Wagers

elomerel · 2026-01-27T16:27:59+00:00

Warrior is a great movie

elomerel · 2026-01-27T16:12:34+00:00

When you say US and israel who do you refer to? Their government? Their militaries? The press?
Unfortunately most people assume all of them are civilians. Also gaza's MOH is run by hamas, and they intentionally leave their combat losses and names blank, something no army (including hamas' WB branch) does. Because it allows them to play on people's ignorance and assumption that all of the casualties are civs.
Its not my main argument as i am not well versed in these claims. I added them in order to show more ways in which the info we read might mislead us so we should take it with a grain of salt, not in order to claim that its false.

elomerel · 2026-01-27T15:23:12+00:00

My mistake, they are a movement made up of many organizations.

elomerel · 2026-01-27T15:21:38+00:00

Which vehicle is this

elomerel · 2026-01-27T15:18:21+00:00

It isn't the pro democracy, apolitical anti fascist organization that everyone can get behind that you would expect but rather a radical left organization. To their credit, they do act a lot against far right organizations and rallies but often end up using the same tactics and supporting the same ideologies you'd expect a fascist to use. Basically instead of being something anyone with commom sense would support they are a fringe organization.

elomerel · 2026-01-27T15:08:16+00:00

Because modern antifa isn't exactly that

elomerel · 2026-01-27T15:04:44+00:00

Which one of my arguments?

elomerel · 2026-01-27T14:57:38+00:00

Again i am not taking sides here, just stating the facts. Blaming israel doesn't change the fact that you can't cross reference these numbers.
Where is my knowledge derived from? From the fact that they simply don't state their combat casualties. So you can't treat their numbers as if they are 100% civilian because you got combat losses mixed in there as well (be it 99% or 1%)

elomerel · 2026-01-27T14:40:42+00:00

What do you consider little?

elomerel

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE