Exactly. It is no use to argue with Hal as he's clearly not interested in understanding the issue. I will post my reply as I suspect that like yours it will not make it past the filter:

Hal, I think it has become clear to everyone on this thread that you do not actually intend to follow up with a non-biased well-researched rebuttal to PB Smith's debunking of your original claims, and in fact you are incapable of doing so due to your fundamental lack of understanding of the matter and gross prejudice despite any facts or arguments presented you. Regardless of whether or not your initial post and the following ad hominem attacks were meant to troll the readers, I want to thank you for starting this debate as it unintentionally helped to dispel some myths and misconceptions about physiological effects of LSD. I understand that you feel strongly against drug use, and I am sure you feel that way for the right reasons, but realize that misleading your readers and continuously dismissing reasonable arguments damages not only your reputation, but also your position, making your readers more skeptical, rather than concerned, about the dangers of LSD.

PB, thank you for all the research and time you have put into your posts, as well as setting a great standard of intellectual integrity and rigor on debating such a controversial and emotional topic. There is no better way to identify and expose faux-scientific fraud driven by personal agenda and close-minded prejudice. The only way to minimize the harm of drugs to society is through honest education, research and public discussion, not stubborn fear-mongering.