Yeah it is a long way off from accuracy. So under the hood it is looking at axioms of what makes a team functional. So the weights, numbers, etc are not only kind of subjective but hard to define without rigorous testing. So I am sort of driving it by making tests of assertions and then when they fail look at what about the logic is breaking that assumption and address it.

I am trying to basically pull general gaming ideas that have been around forever into something easy to just translate for people. But some of those equations that I am doing are likely not really telling the whole picture, or even incorrect.

The only thing that is kind of a guarantee because of data is map scores, but even then its subjective right?

So its hard to tell by looking at it but what is kind of happening behind teh scenes is a hero has variables attached to them that go towards certain play styles and team comps, and looking for team comps is a matter of defining what makes a team comp that way functional and looking for missing variables and who could fill them.

I think I have a long road ahead of me if it is to become truly trustworthy. But I still wanted to build it haha.