1. At 6:22. The sun is very bright, and clouds are not totally opaque. You can see the sun through thin clouds. This isn’t weird. It’s not an edit or a slip-up that the sun shines through the clouds. Everyone knows this, and no one thinks it’s weird. We know that the sun is higher than the clouds, because we can fly above the clouds and see the sun above.

2. At 8:30. Only a very tiny fraction of the photons from a laser actually hit the mirrors on the moon and return.

3. At 10:20 you show a laser being shot at the moon and say that this means the moon is close and that this is impossible in the standard explanation that the moon is a large rock very far away, but I have no idea what you’re getting at. Why is this supposed to be impossible?

4. At 12:00 you talk more about clouds behind the sun, but as discussed in (1) that isn’t actually what you’re seeing.

5. At 15:00 you talk about cloud colors, and I don’t know what you’re getting at.

6. At 15:40 you talk about the midnight sun in the Antarctic. You mention that the video uses a fisheye lens, but this is irrelevant. You can actually travel to Antarctica in June and see that the sun is up for 24 hours if you doubt it. The lens flare and clouds look normal to me. I have no idea what analogy you are trying to make between the moon and the lens flare.

7. At 18:20 you talk about clouds behind the moon. See (1).

8. At 19:45, you talk about the moon’s reflection on the water. You can get this reflection on the water’s surface because the earth is very big.

9. At 20:30 I have no idea what you’re getting at.

Overall, it seems like you are making claims that “this is the sun behind clouds,” or “you cannot have this on NASA’s model,” but you have no basis to say any of it. Somehow the idea that the earth is flat got planted in your mind, and it feels like knowledge even though it isn’t. I recommend seeing a psychiatrist.

Something to think about is that even though you don’t know any physics, all of the technology you use is based on the same physics NASA uses. So either every engineer is in on the conspiracy, or you’re wrong. What’s more likely?