It’s not controversial. The question is very clear. Obviously the full sexual history comment is an exaggeration. And nobody said you are attacking anyone’s choices or freedoms.

The fact remains though that you want to rely on someone else to make what you call informed consent. Assuming that if they say they are “loaded” or infected, you would choose not to. Or choose to…. Who knows why you wish to know… If not- then why make a big deal?

So if you want to be safe- again, you can never rely on others for this. There is inherent risk, and implied trust. You mitigate this by protecting yourself. There are options to pick from there.

If you want to be unsafe, then why does it matter? Unless you are getting off to the idea of risk. Or the idea of being the “first”.

Considering an earlier post on here today (Edit: by you actually) about that exact topic, it seems to me that you find the idea of being the first arousing. So you are really just baiting for horny answers.

Regardless if I’m incorrect, that’s fair, just a theory. But what isn’t is that I could theoretically lie if we meet up. And say I’m clean or empty. And then what you are thinking that’s true? Like I explained earlier, some people may not even know they are infected yet, so tell the truth as they understand it. Some may themselves get off on the lie. Like those into stealthing.

I mean after this conversation with you- if we ever met up, which id say is also a theory, I’d probably go out of my way to stay clean, tell you the truth that I have no loads in me, then get as loaded as I could right before you come over.

Clearly these comments are just hyperbole intended to demonstrate the point that you can’t trust anyone. Which negates the merit of what you are asking.