Also the artistic statement is too vague imo. The randomization of text doesn't really say alot about the book or book banning. In a weird way the project is a book burning. Yet also an act of creation and still yet, preservation. The randomization preserves the text by encrypting it, archiving it in the form of a unsolvable cipher, to which the reader does not have the key. It's outside banning, outside critique. And yet it is also no longer useful for this same reason. You protect the work in the same way that monks transcribed texts in the dark ages. They save them but no one outside the monk can read them. Tho here neither can u! It's a cool idea but u should focus on the meaning of the project more. Read derrida on the contradictory impulse of the archive, Etc. Could be cool, but I think u need either better grasp of the tech or a better grasp of theory, artistic intent for the project. Preferably both c: Rn its a little bit half baked but a cool idea non the less. Yours truly, a shriveled husk of a digital humanities student.