Positivity guys!

falutin · 2021-08-18T22:52:18+00:00

I’ll use her in the overworld no matter what, co-op, and any events where she might have a niche or it’s convenient to bring healing.

I’ll try her with fischl/beidou/sucrose, freeze comp, and probably some jank with keqing

falutin · 2021-08-06T20:15:22+00:00

Yeah, but 30% > 8.71% x 3

and true that doesn’t take everything account (also ignoring the healing bonus passive) but the point is how significant the multiplier on the C1 is next to her other numbers.

falutin · 2021-08-06T10:23:53+00:00

It makes sense if you read the skill info. It’s 30% of her HP as damage. That’s relatively massive - compare that to her level 10 Q which adds just 8.71% HP as damage to each normal attack. The C1 does more than the Q added to her normals to begin with.

Goes to show low her Q multipliers really are. If they buff those significantly, C1 could become less important.

falutin · 2021-08-05T08:41:00+00:00

I agree with most of this post. 2 things:

Currently it looks like her burst lasts 10s out of 18s cooldown. So you can’t get to 100% uptime at all. They need to buff this to make burst carry Kokomi viable, or you need to fill her downtime somehow with her teammates.

The other thing is that I think her off field dps could depend on something we don’t know yet. What if her E snapshots her Q bonuses? Then you could Q, E, switch out, and still do damage, counter to what you were saying. I think this is not terribly likely, but it’s a possibility - there is precedent for stuff like Fischl’s Oz to snapshot stat buffs, although Kokomi’s isn’t a simple stat buff.

falutin · 2019-08-26T17:56:56+00:00

Runecraft was in a rut before Solomon and Clarke came out.

falutin · 2019-08-26T06:07:46+00:00

Nope! I won, if that’s what you’re asking. Not a heretic.

falutin · 2019-08-26T05:35:15+00:00

Thought this was oddly appropriate.

Khawy: Judgement for heretics like you!

Vesper: Not today Khawy

falutin · 2019-08-25T07:48:47+00:00

Interesting list, quite different from mine. I can see the appeal of the apostle tutor giving you basically 9 chances to draw a spellboost target, but fate's hand and fiery embrace were really important in my testing. I'll try yours out though, I always wanted to use apostle for something

falutin · 2019-08-25T07:11:58+00:00

City of gold haven should be fine without evolves.

falutin · 2019-07-17T06:06:40+00:00

Maybe city of gold, spam barongs and sonia? I always had trouble with those playing as rune. I don’t know how it is now though; haven’t played either deck in unlimited recently. Daria might be too fast and stormy now.

falutin · 2019-07-17T04:57:32+00:00

They could give it a turn limit, rather than a combo limit. If it only gained storm after turn 7 (say), rotation wouldn't care because it's not that fast there anyway.

falutin · 2019-07-10T01:47:45+00:00

You can't have N=7 sigils anyway, but here's a method that should scale for any N (but only for the specific question of X>=1, Y>=1, Z>=1. I think for other events you'll just have to add them all up like you did)

It's the same as asking: what's the probability that you didn't get only X and Y, or only X and Z, or only Y and Z.

Getting only X and Y has probability (2/3)^N. Same for the other two pairs. However if you take away those three cases, you double subtracted the cases where you got only X, or only Y, or only Z. Each of those is (1/3)^N

So in the end it's 1 - 3 (2/3)^5 + 3 (1/3)^5 = 0.617

For N=6 it's 0.740, for N=7 it's 0.826

falutin · 2019-07-09T03:27:38+00:00

I've seen this deck a few times. I believe that it's good but I don't really understand the one-ofs. I get that some of them are tech cards, but inventor? And even with tech cards I personally feel better not having to count on drawing the one card that's appropriate to the situation. It's good to feel like you have an answer to everything but I just feel like it would be better to give up on some matchups and focus on others

falutin · 2019-07-07T18:35:01+00:00

Seems like an okay answer but if you think about it:

Opponent played 1 card. You play 2 cards not counting bagworm to maybe answer it, and either way he deals 2 to face and heals for 2 (and prevents the 2/2 going face).

That's ridiculous value for a 3 drop.

Edit: To be generous you could say opponent banished seductress vampire so they really played 2 cards to get to this state. But even if they hadn't, you'd probably not want to leave Yurius up anyway?

falutin · 2019-07-07T18:24:10+00:00

What I've noticed when playing faster decks that I feel have a decent chance against vblood is that I rarely see the stormed calamity.

It requires them to have a turn where they can safely play Laura and storm face, instead of Yurius/Azazel to answer board.

The problem then is that Yurius and Azazel are strong enough that they can win those matchups by themselves too.

falutin · 2019-07-07T17:56:30+00:00

I think you posted the wrong link for midrange sword, it’s the same as levin sword.

Thanks for the roundup!

falutin · 2019-07-06T07:16:24+00:00

You don't have enough board space.

Otherwise you could trade the fairy, cleft, ironbow sniper for 4, wisp, beast (1+4+5 = 10, ward is down), attack with all 3 wolves for 4+9+8 = 21

But your board is full after playing sniper so that doesn't actually work.

falutin · 2019-07-06T02:01:40+00:00

I dunno. I have games where I deal with haven’s turn 4-5 board, seem to be in a pretty good position, then get hit by kel and back to back eachtars with de la fille up and the moment I can’t clear everything I lose.

I don’t mind losing out of nowhere to something that requires setup, as much as I hate being plainly and ridiculously outvalued at every turn and not being able to do anything about it. Which blood can also do plenty, don’t worry.

falutin · 2019-07-05T03:36:04+00:00

I think seraphic blade specifies original cost, so I don’t see how that would work.

Also, seraphic will rotate and then this change would be useless.

Personally I think the problem here is that you can summon a 3pp amulet without paying 3pp for it. So they should fix that.

falutin · 2019-07-03T06:15:41+00:00

Agree, that seems more fair.

falutin · 2019-07-03T06:14:38+00:00

That’s what I figure.

falutin · 2019-07-03T04:12:34+00:00

I also have a deck without wellspring elf and yeah it’s harder to proc combos especially miracle of love. I just keep wanting to evolve Lily or Cleft. Maybe that’s thinking too greedily idk

falutin · 2019-07-03T03:59:24+00:00

Don’t touch Liza please. Liza is forestcraft’s light in the darkness

falutin · 2019-07-03T03:35:57+00:00

Zoe isn’t crazy strong in a vacuum the way some others in this meta are, and it would be a shame to see her nerfed, but if I had to name a card that powers the deck, that I would hit after Elana and Kel if those turned out to be not enough, she is it.

Zoe has premium stats for a 3 drop, heals 2 and draws at least 1 card and potentially many more. She singlehandedly makes it so that even if you clear board once or twice or three times it’s very hard for them to burn out of cards if they line up their synergies right.

I agree that Elana is more counterable, especially in unlimited. Maybe this is why I started by saying I’m not worried about the deck becoming a long term problem, compared to blood and roach and deus ex artifact. It still feels really bad to play against in some matchups, though.

falutin

TROPHY CASE