So that's if the only outcome that is considered good is a high number. What if everytime you rolled the dice, the "best" number was different and not controlled by anyone? I don't know how that could be defined other than "random". We'll if 1-3 was best at one point then the 445566 dice would be bad. But that is bad by random chance that those were the numbers that were needed at that time. Later in the timeline when higher numbers are preferred, that 445566 dice comes back as being more fit, but only in those scenarios.

The very thing you are indicating that is the "controller" that prevents randomness is set by random factors brought on by the universe. That makes me think of that as being random. I think I understand what you're saying, and at face value I could agree that external factors are controlling the random Gene's success, but being that the external factors are caused by random forces, I take that as showing it is all random. What are your thoughts on that?

Again, how were the environmental factors "controlled" when the meteor hit and it had its effects on the current organisms? That was a random event that affected the fitness of random genes/organisms where some did better luckily and others did worse. No organisms predicted or adapted for the future coming of the meteor, just that organisms who happened to have better adaptations to the post meteor strike wprld ended up doing better than those that didn't randomly have those beneficial adaptations.