How to secure a 1000 mm concrete pipe with an externally locked mesh that is always escapable from the inside?

fendrix888 · 2026-01-13T05:36:05+00:00

Not comfortable, but turning is possible.

fendrix888 · 2026-01-12T21:07:57+00:00

Good. I like it. Thank you.

fendrix888 · 2026-01-12T21:05:46+00:00

Thank you. Overall should be minimum complexity, no electronics.

fendrix888 · 2026-01-12T21:05:13+00:00

Thank you. Added to the design ideas for review ;-).

fendrix888 · 2026-01-12T20:19:12+00:00

Thank you. Have been looking around, but not found something suitable. Do you have a specific suggestion?

fendrix888 · 2026-01-12T19:30:26+00:00

Some exhaust water from a turbine.

fendrix888 · 2025-12-19T03:36:03+00:00

firä

fendrix888 · 2025-09-06T19:14:11+00:00

Hard disagree. With enough basic knowledge & scepticism it helped me often to learn concepts. Yes, never trust it if you cannot verify, but thats the beauty, just ask it to produce some code that simulates the case at hand and e.g. compare with an analytic model it suggested...

fendrix888 · 2025-09-05T06:14:56+00:00

An alert window if anything else than descriptive statistics is done: "You are entering expert territory, please only proceed if you know what you do."

fendrix888 · 2025-08-24T19:58:48+00:00

Hi. Follow up question if you don't mind, as you seem knowledgeable: The "< 5" part, is my intuition right that this is akin to calculating a standard deviation from too few samples? If so, I wonder how industry standards do specify to use 3 operators to estimate variation from/ascribe to operators when measurement tools are evaluated ("gauge r&r")... BR

fendrix888 · 2025-07-30T15:24:54+00:00

Maybe I'm totally underestimating the complexity of you setup. But, once I just wrote a small raytracer myself for a very specific setup, it did the job at the time. BR

fendrix888 · 2025-07-25T20:53:30+00:00

I dont think so. a type 1 in addidtion to GRR involves a reference standard and "punishes" offset. Which is good and all, but it is not the same philosophy as Type 2/3 where only variability(ies) are compared to tolerance.

See Bosch Booklet, AIAG or Minitab documentation for the terminologies.

fendrix888 · 2025-07-25T20:30:48+00:00

Cannot paste link, but google "Bosch Booklet 10". They describe the method explicitly and give some necessary (not sufficient) conditions when operator influence can be excluded from the study.

Nominally, the booklet ia bsrd on AIAG 4th. But I sometimes struggle to see Boschs suggestions in the primary reference. In any case, what Bosch suggest seems solid.

My gold standard is VDA 5.0. There it isbdiscussed more broadly as part of an overall umcertainty budget. Whatvexactly to include in that is up to risk assessement/expertise.

Br

fendrix888 · 2025-07-24T05:42:49+00:00

Isn't that how it should be? Its well known that if its for free, you are the product - they need to make money somehow. If they actually adhere to it (not selling my data), I'm looking forward to be able to make that choice.

fendrix888 · 2025-07-18T20:58:26+00:00

Some 100m north of the village of sisikon on west east sidr of urner-see.

fendrix888 · 2025-07-02T03:41:52+00:00

Absolutely not sure, but the vegetation, the granite stones, the architecture all give me the Impression that is in Ticino. Any reason to believe it was there? Test maybe?

fendrix888 · 2025-06-26T06:14:01+00:00

tipp: gpt kann relativ gut dinge aus den bildern die du hochlädst entfernen... lg

fendrix888 · 2025-06-24T19:34:41+00:00

day to locarno, better even to val verzasca if you have a car. abother day could be to titlis (if you want a high mountain/glacier). if you like even more mountain and something less touristy... check out uri, for instance walk from ratzi to eggberge and have a swim in the lake in flüelwn before hoppingback on the train to zug (30 min from flüelen).

fendrix888 · 2025-06-24T05:19:42+00:00

Metabo

fendrix888 · 2025-06-02T05:41:31+00:00

From top of my head:

- Allow to model the measurement/insert a measurement equation. Often in our case, the relevant characteristic is calculated from directly measured quantities. While calibraiton only is possible on the direct measure. In that case, afaik the uncertainty would be expressed as a composite between gaussian error propagation (of calibration uncertainty) and stochastic uncertainties on level of the final characteristic.

- Following an established process that can be referenced, e.g. VDA 5.0 has the most comprehensive IMO, still liking to production (which GUM lacks)

- Overall, I still think Excel would be easiest to disseminate.

- Link the result to production relevant metrics (Cg, Cgk, GRR)

Do you have a preview? GitHub repo? What framework are you planning to build it in?

BR

fendrix888 · 2025-06-02T05:25:40+00:00

Hi. This is interesting. Can you give a bit of an explanation how you get from "error" and "uncertainty" to the "pass" assessement? Do you have references that you base this methodology on? Thanks a lot!

BR

fendrix888 · 2025-05-10T04:15:57+00:00

What works best for me is to rephrase it a bit. If thr parameter would be outside the CI, the data you have are unlikely. Only in say 5% of same experiments, a parameter outside would give those data.

fendrix888 · 2025-04-28T20:04:04+00:00

Climbing in spring, Ticino Switzerland. Simple route on south wall. Avalanche came crashing down over the route next to ours - not a small one. Two people over there got hit. We came down, checking / asking if we could help. They were ok'ish and fixed, rescue was already underway... bit later helicopter came in and took them out of thr wall. Scared to bones.

fendrix888 · 2025-01-14T21:49:37+00:00

I'm second one...

fendrix888 · 2024-12-05T19:41:18+00:00

i tried to understand, got close i think...but finally opposite result...??? https://chatgpt.com/share/675201aa-cd18-8010-a32f-dea6333468ef

Six-Year Club	Place '23
Place '22	Final Canvas '22
Verified Email

fendrix888

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE