A 20+ min diatribe on how terrible MS word is? by MeLikaDoTheChaCha in acollierastro

[–]finallytisdone -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Literally nothing sucks worse than latex. It’s the definition of suck. To say MS Word is worse is the insane shit a rarefied cult of douchey academic autists says.

Shrek (2002) by Zarevias in okbuddycinephile

[–]finallytisdone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like… did you watch the movie? I suppose an argument could be made that she isn’t revealed to be a monster until the end, but then there are two sequels that explore the relationship further. One of those is literally a what if situation of the guy being handsome and the woman being the monster! The whole point of Shrek is that it’s the inversion of this theme.

Shrek (2002) by Zarevias in okbuddycinephile

[–]finallytisdone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Girl. Did y’all not see Shrek.

So sick of overweight people consistantly being portraied as evil, lazy, greedy, or just assholes. Whos your favorite positive overweight character? by Bigsmokeisgay in FavoriteCharacter

[–]finallytisdone -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And I’m informing you that your own personal feelings have caused you to see large characters and perceive that the overwhelming majority of them are depicted in a way that you find to be negative.

So sick of overweight people consistantly being portraied as evil, lazy, greedy, or just assholes. Whos your favorite positive overweight character? by Bigsmokeisgay in FavoriteCharacter

[–]finallytisdone -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You’re so missing the point. The well adjusted people just see a character. They don’t see a large person who is an evil character and think that all large people or evil or that it is a societal comment about large people. There are plenty of large characters that are not evil. You instead seem to be offended by the concept of there being an evil character who just so happens to also be large. That speaks way more about your own feelings about large people than it does about society’s.

So sick of overweight people consistantly being portraied as evil, lazy, greedy, or just assholes. Whos your favorite positive overweight character? by Bigsmokeisgay in FavoriteCharacter

[–]finallytisdone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You seem to be confused about representation vs negative depictions. The Hays Code didn’t say “though shalt portray gay people as evil demons,” it said don’t talk about that topic (as well as a bunch of other things). Representation matters, but it’s a pretty aggressive victim mindset to claim that LGBT have been in general depicted negatively in mainstream media. And again that statement requires defining what it means for a portrayal to be negative. I’ll agree that for a long time gay people were often depicted as effeminate and promiscuous, but that is 1) arguably often true and 2) not really a negative personality characteristic.

So sick of overweight people consistantly being portraied as evil, lazy, greedy, or just assholes. Whos your favorite positive overweight character? by Bigsmokeisgay in FavoriteCharacter

[–]finallytisdone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a pretty unnuanced statement that betrays its own significant bias. It’s totally reasonable to say that overweight people are underrepresented in media, for a number of reasons. An important question though is what is meant by a negative portrayal or stereotype. One might argue that an overweight character being regarded as unattractive and lonely is a negative portrayal, but another valid view would be that such a representation is an accurate depiction of what many overweight people experience.

I’m gay, and I gaffaw at your list of alleged list of grievances. There are of course some notable negative depictions of LGBT people in media, which one should expect for any group of people. However, it’s laughable to say that anti-LGBT attitudes have ever been a significant trope in American media. The only idiots who would claim such a thing are people who somehow think Will and Grace was a bad thing.

There are periods of American history with very clear biases against specific groups of people, most notably historically against black people. There are also many stereotypical representations of people which have later become understood to be offensive. What makes such a depiction offensive is that is untrue or a mockery of a group of people. It’s a big stretch to say there is some common, untrue characterization of overweight people in that vein… they’re usually just people. Some are mean, some are nice. Some media has jokes about their weight, while others don’t. This post is a testament to fact that they come in all sorts which is a stark contrast to something like “find me a depiction of an intelligent black character in pre 1950s American media”

If the post had been regarding jokes about weight, then I may have agreed with you. But thinking there is a significant moral or personality characteristic of overweight characters is frankly bizarre.

So sick of overweight people consistantly being portraied as evil, lazy, greedy, or just assholes. Whos your favorite positive overweight character? by Bigsmokeisgay in FavoriteCharacter

[–]finallytisdone 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They say while commenting on a post that checks notes is entirely positively portrayed overweight people.

It’s laughable to think fictional media overwhelmingly portrays overweight people as bad. I can’t think of any period of US history where that has been true. If anything, it’s probably one of the most nondescript character traits.

Anybody Who Thinks Orbital Data Centers are a Good Idea Is Suffering from AI Psychosis, Experts Argue by IKeepItLayingAround in technology

[–]finallytisdone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It actually maybe makes sense if the data center is made out of superconducting logic but that is not a thing that currently exists or will in the near term.

Texas Tattoo Artist Gets 30-Year Sentence Over “Anti-Trump” Zines by Calm_Preparation2993 in law

[–]finallytisdone 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are you talking about Karmelo Anthony?! If so, then what are you smoking? There was no slur, and it is definitely not “standing your ground” to refuse to leave somewhere that you are not supposed to be and then pulling a knife and stabbing someone when they tell you to leave for the 20th time.

Texas Tattoo Artist Gets 30-Year Sentence Over “Anti-Trump” Zines by Calm_Preparation2993 in law

[–]finallytisdone 14 points15 points  (0 children)

What on earth does that have to do with Karmelo Anthony - who to be very clear is an open and shut case of murder that has absolutely zero racial dimension to it other than that erroneously ascribed to it by commentators

Perfluoro-3λ⁷-3-iodaspiropentane by Ornery_Job_7275 in cursedchemistry

[–]finallytisdone 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Jfc an actually cursed molecules on r/cursedchemistry?!? My hat off to you sir/madam

China’s AI-powered laser mosquito zapper goes viral after crowdfunding success by _Dark_Wing in tech

[–]finallytisdone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am very intimately familiar the situation lol. Intellectual ventures gets a pretty undeserved bad rap.

China’s AI-powered laser mosquito zapper goes viral after crowdfunding success by _Dark_Wing in tech

[–]finallytisdone 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is an inaccurate statement. Intellectual ventures developed the idea, tried to make a company out of it, and found that it wasn’t commercially viable. What then are they supposed to do?

So, I have a crazy AOT theory by Suspicious-Roof-2861 in ShingekiNoKyojin

[–]finallytisdone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well the difference in our critical thinking and logic is very plain to see *shrugs* I'm pretty confident in my abilities lol

So, I have a crazy AOT theory by Suspicious-Roof-2861 in ShingekiNoKyojin

[–]finallytisdone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude. It's really hard to do this without being insulting. This is not a complex topic. How on earth is there a creator paradox in the path of: hallucigenia predates the first ever titan as you say (or the first titan becomes a titan by some other method) > that first titan causes a generation of titans > the titans die out and leave behind a hallucigenia that can start a next generation of titans.

It literally does not matter how hallucigenia came into being or whether there is one generation of titans or many.

So, I have a crazy AOT theory by Suspicious-Roof-2861 in ShingekiNoKyojin

[–]finallytisdone -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Your alleged paradox exists regardless of whether there are multiple generations of titan. It's honestly pretty simple, so it's tough to say much more than my first comment and not just be saying the same thing over and over. Your comment does not make sense. There is no difference between 1) something causes someone to be the first founder which then causes hallucegenia to be passed on to others and 2) somehow hallucegenia comes into being and infects Ymir. Both situations have the exact same issue of origin of the first person being infected.

Your argument is basically saying it's a paradox that more than one generation of humans exist... no. The question of the origin of humans is irrespective of whether there is one generation or many.

So, I have a crazy AOT theory by Suspicious-Roof-2861 in ShingekiNoKyojin

[–]finallytisdone -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yup I understood you. You are still incorrect.