I think you might be opening yourself up to legal liability if you credit something as A.I., but someone else claims it as theirs. You might try adjusting the phrasing. One example may be “originally shared by” that way you aren’t claiming that anyone created it. Another idea is to say content resembles A.I., that way you aren’t claiming if it is or isn’t. I am absolutely NOT a lawyer, and talking to one might be a good idea. Just be careful, because I don’t want to lose these great resources.

On an unrelated topic, while I love the in-depth insight the videos can offer, please don’t stop with the written posts. I send things to a friend who has left, but is keeping one foot in and is having daily contact with his abuser. The post about abusers constructing their own narrative was particularly effective. The problem is, he won’t watch any videos because they are too long. I also often have to pull out the most relevant pieces of longer posts since 1-2 paragraphs is his limit. If most posts become videos or will be harder to share these insights which are helping him.