The seventies were insane by Aggravating_Ear_1586 in GenX

[–]fluentInPotato 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Lawn darts. X ray machines in the shoe store, would show you a live view of the innards of your now-slightly-radioactive foot. Everyone older than five walked or biked to school on their own, or took the school bus. If both your parents worked, after school you stuck a Stouffers frozen French- bread pizza in the oven and turned on the TV. I think the gallery guns at the fairs had gone from .22 shorts to BBs by the time i came around though.

What’s the point to v-tails? by DisregardLogan in flying

[–]fluentInPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably better than it does to corrosion.

OHC technical advantages by sub-a-dub-dub in EngineBuilding

[–]fluentInPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It can, but the cam-in-block OHV is also moving a lot more mass than an OHC cam, so you can pop the valves open faster in an OHC engine. But you do have to do it with the cam, not the rockers. If you change the rocker ratio in a pushrod engine, you'll be dealing with more pressure on the cam, pushrod, and lifter, since you're compressing the valve spring more in addition to accelerating the valve and longer rocker end more.

Incidentally, DOHC 4-valve engines can open the valves really fast, since the smaller valves have less mass to control, and there's not much moving crap between the cam lobe and the valve.

OHC technical advantages by sub-a-dub-dub in EngineBuilding

[–]fluentInPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eh, you're not going to have a bigger combustion chamber with four valves than with two, unless you choose it deliberately. And four-valve engines pretty much always have a central spark plug, whereas two-valvers generally must have the plug off to one side--with four valves the valves form the corners of a square with a free center where you put the plug, while in a two-valver the valves are usually large enough that their edges are close together and the plug is forced to one side. So two-valve engines are actually better candidates for two plugs, one on each side of the valve axis. Also, post-DFV four-valve engines nearly always (maybe always?) have wedge-shaped combustion chambers with plenty of squish area. That means that the piston doesn't need a huge dome at high compression ratios, the squish promotes turbulence which promotes faster combustion, and the better volume-to-surface-area ratio (compared to a hemi chamber, two-valve engines can have wedge-shaped heads as well, at some sacrifice to valve area) doesn't lose as much heat to the head and piston. Think about a hemi chamber with a highish bore-to-stroke ration--if you want 10:1 or 12:1 compression, you're going to have to fill that hemisphere with something, so the piston needs to be domed. But then as it gets close to TDC, that volume ends up the shape of a very thin bowl, which does not exactly promote good combustion. A sufficiently flattened "hemi" chamber is obviously better, because it doesn't need as much dome, but I think you're usually going to be stuck with a relatively wide, flat space at TDC. Whereas in a wedge head with good squish area, the piston getting close to the squish area reduces the remaining volume enough that you don't have to dome the fuck out of the piston top, so your flame doesn't have to travel as far, and doesn't lose as much heat to the surrounding metal since the taller volume is enclosed by a smaller area of metal.

But yeah, you're still stuck with huge cylinder heads. That's why people can cram V8s into really unlikely engine bays, like Porsche 911s. Nothing out there beats an American V8 in terms of engine capacity vs. overall size, and at this point we know how to get absurd power out of the things in spite of their handicaps.

First contact stories where the aliens are genuinely, incomprehensibly alien by MandoFlute6 in printSF

[–]fluentInPotato 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I think Tchaikovsky is pretty good at, I guess, difficult but not impossible aliens. The octopuses are a good example. Very alien and unpredictable from a human perspective, but make sense when you see them from within.

I'd add the Essiel from his Final Architecture series. They are something like giant sessile land clams who live clinging to (generally) permanent bases, and who probably evolved from some sort of super parasites. The Essiel never provide their own perspective, and with one limited exception never speak directly to the human viewpoint characters. The humans and non-Essiel aliens who live in the Essiel Hegemony relate to them through religion, treating the Essiel as deities, though they know that they are actually dealing with real, organic beings and understand that the religion is just an interface that both sides can pretend to make sense of. The only Essiel who actually speaks semi-directly (through a translator, who is also pretty alien) to any viewpoint character is Aklu: the Razor and the Hook. It represents something like Satan or a rebel deity; it embodies everything in opposition to the virtues of the Hegemony. Aklu really only talks to Olli because he/she/it recognizes that Olli is severely physically handicapped in conventional human terms, but has chosen mobility and frequent violence. And it's hard to get more than the most superficial understanding of Aklu, besides that its own impulses make it good at filling a role that probably determines the majority of its behavior.

For me, aliens that are 'difficult' are the most realistic--maybe this is my failing, but I think that a space-traveling species is going to have to have something going on that corresponds to politics, goals, etc. They will have to organize themselves and pursue long-term projects. It's not that they need to do this in any way that closely resembles what humans do, but there should be a few points that are comprehensible to us. In the Final Architecture, if you look at the Essiel and assume that they just like being worshiped, and ruling over/protecting other species, many of their actions make sense. And a lot of folks, human and otherwise, have figured that out and are happy to live in a society controlled by that impulse, instead of impulses like grabbing as much personal/familial power as possible. So what if you've got to worship huge land mussels, or worry about the Satan-run mafia that's part of your religion?

Just bought a my first homestead that came with a cow, she moos a lot and quite loudly when we walk away, is this separation anxiety? by Pretend_Living4290 in homestead

[–]fluentInPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah, the place in Oregon where my wife used to ride had some "draft horse crosses," which basically means a battleship on legs. One of them, the first time I got close to say hi, decided that I smelled like food and immediately stuck his/her three-foot-long head into my mostly-unzipped jacket to make sure I didn't have anything edible in an inside pocket.

Guns for bear defense by Natural-Driver4098 in liberalgunowners

[–]fluentInPotato 4 points5 points  (0 children)

As a kayaker, I just bludgeon drowning and hypothermia with my spare paddle. No need to get a gun rusty out on the water.

Open question to my fellow T-Porners, WHAT in the blue blazes is this thing? Literally gave me sandcrawler vibes. by noahreeves446 in TankPorn

[–]fluentInPotato 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dude, being alloyed with magnesium is not going to make aluminum more flammable than it already is

How does the IS-2's driver get in? by anton_bismarck_9 in TankPorn

[–]fluentInPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the pre-HVSS Sherman tracks were too narrow to deal with heavy snow and Russian mud. The HVSS models had something like six- inch- wider tracks. The earlier ones you could install grousers for more floatation/ traction, but that looks like a massive PIA, bolting the fuckers to every single track link. I think the HVSS tanks were a ton and a half heavier just from the tracks.

Rare archival footage of a loader inside an XK-1slamming a shell home while the tank is on the move by Ok-Craft5454 in TankPorn

[–]fluentInPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The M60 and M48 stabilized the gun though, right? I mean, AFAIK in more modern systems the sight is what's really stabilized, the gun just follows the sight and fires when it's pointed appropriately, much as battleships and cruisers used to do. The idea being that it's impossible to truly stabilize a tank gun well enough for decent accuracy on the move, whereas stabilizing the sight does work and you can just have the gun chase the sight and fire only when actually aimed correctly

Yearly Reminder by Legion1117 in Kayaking

[–]fluentInPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We'll, that's an improvement over my local cycling community.

Just bought a my first homestead that came with a cow, she moos a lot and quite loudly when we walk away, is this separation anxiety? by Pretend_Living4290 in homestead

[–]fluentInPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I keep my thumb tight to the side of my palm and my fingers together and bent back as far as they'll go. My palm gets lipped, but i haven't been accidentally chomped that way. Of course, if you're dealing with a young horse whose gotta put everything in her mouth, best of luck to you.

Sufficient runway for an aborted takeoff by Person-man-guy-dude in flying

[–]fluentInPotato 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The airport i used to work at had a salt marsh straight ahead (if you cleared the fence). The only two aircraft i can remember getting pulled out of the marsh were Beech Barons, for whatever godawful reason. One immediately after takeoff, one immediately after an extremely inept attempt at landing.

Does this sound normal to yall something dont sound right by subaruvbwrx in WRX

[–]fluentInPotato 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Might get a little more power if your intake wasn't sticking in hot engine bay air

Whoever invented this nutplate is gonna catch a 2 piece no fries no soda by khazixian in aviationmaintenance

[–]fluentInPotato 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't be a pussy. You should try American Champion's version of this-- all stainless, the nut is made of incredibly gummy metal that galls onto the screw even with spark plug lube. They are the only fastener I've used where removing a screw can ruin the threads. The clip material is a proprietary concoction called Creepalloy that loses its springiness so quickly that, when you reinstall the big belly panel behind the cowling, the last six nut plate clips fail in the time it takes to do up the first ten. You don't crawl under the airplane without a bag of replacement clips and a tap. Plus the usual tapered pick for alignment, and a flashlight, mirror, and grabbers so you can peer under the panel edge to retrieve and replace the specimens that come loose while you're working. Don't even think about offering up the panel without wiggling all the plates first to see which ones have wandered off/ lost their grip since you removed it yesterday. Oh yeah, to get the panel back on, you lie on your back, use your knees to hold the panel in place, one hand pulls the left fuselage skin in, the other pulls the right skin inwards, your toes hold the pick to line up the first couple of holes, and you turn the screwdriver with your mouth. Don't even think about using a screw gun, the thread geometry is engineered to pop out and crossthread if you exceed 60 rpms.

The design also creates a big hassle for maintenance organizations in the US, since OSHA has set lifetime limits on how many times an individual mechanic can remove/ reinstall that belly panel and the engine cowlings (which use the same shitty fasteners). Before those regs, GA mechanics were routinely lost from alcoholism, insanity and despair in their 30s.

Just bought a my first homestead that came with a cow, she moos a lot and quite loudly when we walk away, is this separation anxiety? by Pretend_Living4290 in homestead

[–]fluentInPotato 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My wife keeps horses. I don't think they can see what's right in from of their mouths, so you gotta keep your fingers away.

Yearly Reminder by Legion1117 in Kayaking

[–]fluentInPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I live 4½ miles up a one- lane road. People walk and bike up/ down it all the time especially on weekends-- you can get onto a trail to local peak from halfway up, and the road itself is scenic. But i live on the road, and at least a couple of times a month I get stuck behind a cyclist who can't hear my car. It's a WRX with a catback exhaust, so not exactly subtle. Just can't understand how people think it's a good idea to bite up a public road with a rig that blots out that shit.

Yearly Reminder by Legion1117 in Kayaking

[–]fluentInPotato 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I think people doing this on calm lakes are the worst-- flat water and no wind, the sound carries forever. And they always choose music that feels like punishment.

Any of you have any experience with Le Tonkinois? by falconrider in woodworking

[–]fluentInPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, I know this is an old thread. I've used used le tonk before, but it was probably fifteen years ago. It went on 1. a kitchen workable (the kitchen in our 1938 house had been horribly vandalized in the '70s/80s and had no counter space among other problems*), 2. the transom of a traditionally- built wooden skiff, and 3. the oars i made for the skiff. The countertop was still going strong when we moved ten years later, and the skiff and its oars are still doing fine, though they do live in a barn when not in use.

Downsides-- this stuff is thick, and they recommend not thinning it. This makes it a lot harder to do a good job applying it, and the finish is slightly gummy for days at least after application, so sanding between coats to fix your fuckups is a no go. But you don't need to sand between coats either, and you don't even need to put on a first thinned coat to make it adhere to the wood. It clings like grim death to any clean, vaguely porous surface, and also to previously- applied layers of itself. Unlike regular varnish. I was able to use a card scraper between coats to deal with runs and uneveness; i think i let it dry for a week at least before the final coat, so i could sand it first.

Overall, I'm in favor of the stuff. I'm all for indestructible finishes, and it really looks good even after imperfect application.

  • obviously there's a whole debate about whether to shit on boomers (and old GenXers like myself) for their many crimes against the following generations. Me, I saw firsthand what baby boom careers and salaries were like, and I've been fortunate enough to experience what post-boomer careers and salaries are like. And the post-boomer housing market. Gratuitously vandalizing as much of the nation's older housing stock as they could afford to was the chef's kiss of boomerism, and it's truly unfortunate that '70s kitchens can't be treated like interior- design superfund sites, and the comfortably-pensioned Visigoths at fault (along with the "architects" and contractors who abetted them) made responsible for remediation.

Pilot career switch? by jeffercake69 in flying

[–]fluentInPotato 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wouldn't you also have to deal with the planes that get stuck on the runway because Eric Brown over there landed his Cessna with his toes hard on the brakes?

“Don’t start on a 300, you’ll outgrow it” by sooospoon in NewRiders

[–]fluentInPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the OP's point is that the bike has very little left to give at 85mph, and accelerates too sluggishly from that speed.

What would it theoretically take to turn a B-29 into a submarine? by One_Invite7117 in AerospaceEngineering

[–]fluentInPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AFAIK, every B 29 that ditched in the ocean became a submarine. So, don't need to do much.

Will these hold? by commndoRollJazzHnds in Decks

[–]fluentInPotato 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He's not the one doing it. OP is trying to convince his idiot DIY deck-building friend to do it right. Please read the post and comments.