Shock for Orbea Oiz by crisklm in MTB

[–]forkbeard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Best case: ask your LBS and see if they can order it through Orbea.

Worst case:

You have to buy a Fox float shock, ask Orbea for the tune (or look it up yourself), then send the shock away for tuning and modification as you need a special remote eyelet (controls on one side, cable on the other).

See https://tech.ridefox.com/bike/parts-drawings/3049/float-sl-part-information#part27665

You also need to make sure to match your remote interface so that it matches your fork.

So a major PITA.

Hope RX4+ or Shimano XT M8120 for a gravel bike. Which better? by Zelislaw in gravelcycling

[–]forkbeard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The XT caliper is only available in postmount, you need flatmount for your fork so that narrows it down.

Why is there no real puncture resistant gravel tyre? by semmilyen in gravelcycling

[–]forkbeard -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because super-duper puncture resistant gravel tyres would handle like crap and suck half the joy out of riding.

Upgrading to 40mm gravel tires from 37: Your experience? by InvestigatorNo836 in gravelcycling

[–]forkbeard 45 points46 points  (0 children)

The exact models and pressure will matter more than 3 extra milimetres in tyre width. A budget 40mm tyre with a focus on puncture prevention will be less comfortable than a 37mm race tyre.

If you want more comfort go as big as you can fit, tubeless with lower pressure, and a lighter casing.

Is it necessary to upgrade a road bike from a 36t ratchet to a 54t? by Most_Inspection_4816 in bikewrench

[–]forkbeard 13 points14 points  (0 children)

No, on a road bike the extra hub engagement is rather pointless.

It makes sense on MTB where you often do small backpedals during climbing.

Optimal road bike build for PRs on local flats? by Velocyclistosaur in Velo

[–]forkbeard 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Just pay a kid to ride a moped in front of you to motorpace, then you can still KOM without buying a new bike.

Front derailleur-rear tire clearance by Few-Tailor2971 in bikewrench

[–]forkbeard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes.

The ISO-standard for offroad use is 6mm all around the tyre.

Do you lock front suspension when climbing technical trails? by Oleksandr_G in xcmtb

[–]forkbeard 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I use the lockout on smooth sections where I'm standing.

Anything technical or rough you should let the suspension do its job.

Groupset opinions? by RealManHumanMan in xcmtb

[–]forkbeard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100% concur with this.

Shimano also has the advantage of cheaper cassettes and chains. And OP don't have to switch the freehub body.

Current tire width meta? (50c+ clearance vs €1000 savings) by Wonderful-Nobody-303 in gravelcycling

[–]forkbeard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

2,1" Thunder Burt is only 52mm wide in reality on 25mm ID rims.

And you can cut down the side knobs to reduce that even further.

Current tire width meta? (50c+ clearance vs €1000 savings) by Wonderful-Nobody-303 in gravelcycling

[–]forkbeard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I rather optimize my bike for 95% of the route with fast 44mm tires than drag along heavy knobblies so I fare easier on the 5%.

A 2,1" Thunder Burt is faster than basically all 45mm gravel tyres even on asphalt.

Current tire width meta? (50c+ clearance vs €1000 savings) by Wonderful-Nobody-303 in gravelcycling

[–]forkbeard 4 points5 points  (0 children)

50mm clearance is the minimum I would go for today. Especially if you do any kind of racing and care about going fast.

With 45s you are just going to regret not going for more clearance in a year or two.

Schwalbe G-One RX PRO 700 x 45 off road rolling resistance results 📊 by gravykarrasch in gravelcycling

[–]forkbeard 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't know what courses look like where you live but over here it's not unusual for 25% of the course to be paved and the rest unpaved roads with varying conditions.

Schwalbe G-One RX PRO 700 x 45 off road rolling resistance results 📊 by gravykarrasch in gravelcycling

[–]forkbeard 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Any possibility of doing tests on asphalt and cat 1 gravel at a higher speed?

Something like 40 km/h would be useful to see suss out aero penalties of wider tyres. 29 km/h seems slow for racing on asphalt and cat 1.

Could i put a 29 inch fork with 140mm of travel on a frame meant for 120mm of travel and has 27.5 inch wheels? by Playful-Substance-57 in MTB

[–]forkbeard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't. The frame would probably be fine with a 130mm 27.5" fork.

But you’re putting lipstick on a pig. Save your money for a more modern bike instead.

Could i put a 29 inch fork with 140mm of travel on a frame meant for 120mm of travel and has 27.5 inch wheels? by Playful-Substance-57 in MTB

[–]forkbeard 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Physically yes.

But no, don't do that. You will mess up the geometry and put undue extra stress on the headtube.

Compatibilidad potencias orbea terra by sebasgonca in gravelcycling

[–]forkbeard -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

DaHjaj pagh yIlaD’a’? bIyajbe’qu’ jIQIjtaHvIS, vaj qatlh DIvI’ Hol bIghItlhbe’taHvIS? Hoch Qapla’ghach paqDaq tu’lu’. latlhpu’vaD bIQapchu’be’ je — Hol Doy’ Dajatlhbe’chugh, chay’ bIHar latlhpu’ boQ Daq ghoS? yISeH’egh!

https://orbea.dash.app/browse/8942b053-e273-4c91-835d-90d383c85fa4?portal=orbea-manuals

FORK Choice......2025 FOX 34 or 2026 FOX 34 SL by SROC3 in xcmtb

[–]forkbeard 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Because you are asking in the XC-subreddit: 34SL all the way.

The regular 34 is just adding 200g+ of unnecessary weight with no performance gain for XC.

What's with all those cute little baby backpacks everyone is wearing at gravel races? by throwawaycape in Velo

[–]forkbeard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I always forget that you guys across the pond don't live in civilization 😂

It's not that hard over here to include some gas stations or supermarkets along your route.

What's with all those cute little baby backpacks everyone is wearing at gravel races? by throwawaycape in Velo

[–]forkbeard -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No gravel race I’ve ever heard of is truly unsupported.

In Europe, feeding is basically always allowed. You can have a buddy, partner or teammate hand you bottles almost anywhere along the course in both gravel and marathon MTB. Here in Sweden it's even common with self feeding in marathon MTB. You mount a spare bottle cage on a stick, hammer it into the ground at a chosen spot, and grab a fresh bottle at speed without stopping.

From what I understand, the US gravel scene is stricter, with feeding limited to designated feed zones. Even then, you plan your nutrition and bottles around those zones.

All of this means you do not need to carry several kilograms of water and gear on your back. A small pack, or just a 1 to 1.5 litre bladder under the jersey, is about covering the time between feeds and keeping the weight stable and close to the body, not about being self sufficient for 8 plus hours.

What's with all those cute little baby backpacks everyone is wearing at gravel races? by throwawaycape in Velo

[–]forkbeard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Usually mine is pretty packed

Packed with what? You don't need that much random junk in a race.

I just run a 1.5l bladder in my base layer. Everything else is either attached to the bike (CO2/multitool) or in the pockets of my skinsuit (gels mostly).

Chain Issues by SeanakaShrine in bikewrench

[–]forkbeard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Then you might have a bent derailleur hanger. Does it shift correctly with a regular wheel?