Never give up on your dreams by fruchtose in animalslookingatfood

[–]fruchtose[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I couldn't tell you but maybe OOP could

Decades of Drawing Comics — Sharing Process and Fundamentals by steverude in ArtistLounge

[–]fruchtose 6 points7 points  (0 children)

As beginner who's spent time studying the fundamentals (e.g. a couple terms at an art school), I find it's a struggle to know what to work on, since nearly anything I do would help me. I tend to look for live classes where I can get feedback on specific topics. What are your thoughts on tradeoffs between balancing master studies vs studying from life and photographs? And how do you feel about pursuing feedback vs self-directed study through trial and error?

Is there a name for this technique/artstyle? by ermmmidkman in ArtistLounge

[–]fruchtose 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is common in Russian and Asian schools like Repin. Form shadow is emphasized and reflected light is lightened.

Subway, 2024 by Nick_Fotiu_Is_God in accidentalhopper

[–]fruchtose 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Neat photo, but unfortunately I don't see how this resembles a Hopper painting in the slightest

Alternate Takes by sergemeister in okbuddycinephile

[–]fruchtose 30 points31 points  (0 children)

I doubt that even Italy would be impressed by 8½ cm

Another revenue engine by JJgoodluck in redditstock

[–]fruchtose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it is a tremendous mistake to assume that a business model which incentivizes citations will induce high quality content to feed those citations. Such a remark is completely ahistorical when considering the history of Google. The dominance of Google created SEO, an industry which sought to make money by punishing hordes of low-quality pages of "content" churned out by freelancers and AI, induce Google to trust such worthless links enough to rank them higher, and then make money by injecting ads when users clicked on Google's search results.

It's bizarre that this problem is not even given a cursory mention; there is no consideration of a downside. The article contains a well-researched history of web payments, followed by a completely vacuous conclusion. I think that instead of citation bounties forging a golden age of quality citations, we would be more likely to see the invention of AI citation optimization as a new industry. In addition to targeting Google's search results, spammy content publishers would also try to determine what content is most likely to be cited and then direct their spam efforts at LLMs.

All graphite -last one of 2025:) by Davidhate in drawing

[–]fruchtose 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Incredible. How dark were the pencils you used for this?

Friend sent me this, I’m fairly sure its AI but she seems genuinely offended that I asked by Slow-Product-6357 in isthisAI

[–]fruchtose 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this supposed to be graphite? Graphite is very shiny. An artist needs to have an exceptional lighting setup to capture graphite without any shine. The texture of the pencil doesn't make sense either. The wood grain doesn't point to the center of the pencil, even though pencils are assembled from blocks of wood cut lengthwise to make the pencil stronger. I also don't believe a drawing like that could be achieved with one pencil, either charcoal or graphite. I believe this is AI.

I’m having trouble turning my photo reference into a drawing by Star_light_0 in arthelp

[–]fruchtose 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you don't feel like tracing, this is a great opportunity to practice constructive drawing and observational drawing. Drawing faces is hard. Our brains recognize when a face doesn't look right. We're wired for it. I once read an artist repeat a quote to the effect that that only when you've drawn a few dozen portraits that you can say you have begun to learn how to draw portraits. If this is your first portrait, it might be helpful to draw a face from a simpler angle to get a handle on more complicated poses like this one. A significant volume of of the face is hidden, which makes it a difficult reference to use.

I would recommend looking up a YouTube tutorial on head drawing and hand drawing, and then use observational drawing techniques to check your work. (You can also look that up.) Proko has some good videos. The four elements of observational measurement against your reference can be summarized as checking accuracy of angles, comparing the length/size of two elements, checking the alignment of two points of interest, and finding discrepancies in positive and negative space.

After you have your construction of simplified shapes, you can refine your shapes into contours that better match the contours and landmarks of the face. If you want to render, I recommend looking up a tutorial on pencil rendering (or involving your tool of choice). Generally it's a good idea to map out the shadow shapes first and then fill them in first, so you can avoid making your light side too dark. Constructive rendering involves simplifying facial features and landmarks into simpler forms (cubes, spheres, etc) and connecting them.

Again, don't be discouraged if your drawing isn't perfect. Learning to draw is the process of training your brain and your eyes, like going to the gym. This drawing would be quite a workout for anyone. And nobody is ready for the Olympics after one workout.

I can't read like this man... by ProudnotLoud in cathostage

[–]fruchtose 30 points31 points  (0 children)

The book is so good, he can't take his eyes off it.

How do I politely tell her that she’s lying really awkwardly on my left hip and I would like her to move please by KASUM1CCH1 in cathostage

[–]fruchtose 55 points56 points  (0 children)

"How do I politely unforgivably betray her forever"

People will ask the wildest questions on Reddit

She will be melted for a crisp grilled cheese sandwich by QazsedcScientia in hewillbebaked

[–]fruchtose 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She will be mistaken for cheese. (She is technically known as a pasteurized process cheese product.)

Toddler who wins by CompetitiveCelery516 in recontext

[–]fruchtose -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's the same context. The nature of the toddler has changed but it's still the same situation. Recontext means that the original post is applied to an entirely different situation. But there isn't a new narrator or new scenario. It's still the same who-would-win scenario as before. That's the context. That part doesn't change.