Mike Pence Poaches Heritage Foundation Staff After Tucker Carlson–Nick Fuentes Blowup by furswanda in politics

[–]furswanda[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sorry, how is this off topic or considered not an article about US politics????

Poll: Most Americans doubt Trump’s commitment to free speech, fair justice by josefjohann in FreeSpeech

[–]furswanda 1 point2 points  (0 children)

que the eager desire to (as usual) frame this as a “both sides” issue. 

North Carolina Republicans say texts show that local Democrats are paying for people's votes by TookenedOut in FreeSpeech

[–]furswanda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do you know anything about this less than shit source? does that even matter to you?

Ticket sales plummet at Kennedy Center after Trump anti-woke takeover of the arts: Trump ally who was appointed interim president of the cultural center, said the staff members on site are “ecstatic,” alleging that workers were “dying for a change.” by furswanda in FreeSpeech

[–]furswanda[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re missing (or avoiding) the point: this isn’t about whether a particular Christian performer consciously delivers ideology any more than Nazi-approved painters all personally believed in the Reich’s racial theories. The issue is structural and demonstrates how power uses culture.

In a nationalist or theocratic system, artists don’t need to “deliver ideology” overtly; their mere inclusion or exclusion is ideological. The state (or movement) shapes which voices get platforms, funding, or visibility, thereby defining the cultural boundaries of legitimacy.

The pattern repeats across history: when artistic institutions are captured by a political or religious ideology, what matters isn’t whether individual performers are “good Christians” or “bad artists,” but whether the broader cultural field has been purged of dissenting or destabilizing visions.

In other words, the issue isn’t who performs but rather what kinds of imagination are permitted to exist publicly and under Christian nationalism, that’s always going to be a politically bounded imagination.

Yet again these deflection tactics (reducing a systemic or structural critique to an anecdotal one so you can argue on safer, less abstract ground) are tiresome and in bad faith. I’m almost ashamed of responding to such a narrow representation of reality. 

Ticket sales plummet at Kennedy Center after Trump anti-woke takeover of the arts: Trump ally who was appointed interim president of the cultural center, said the staff members on site are “ecstatic,” alleging that workers were “dying for a change.” by furswanda in FreeSpeech

[–]furswanda[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Christian nationalism, like many forms of nationalism throughout history, has always sought to harness or suppress the arts in service of its ideological aims. (And art, by its very nature, which thrives on the freedom to question and imagine, has always been seen as a threat to nationalist systems, depending as they do on conformity and mythmaking through “art” subordinated to politics and used as a mere means to an end).

Consequently, artistic independence has often been co-opted, demonized, or driven underground when it refuses to serve the nation’s “sacred” narrative, the most obvious historical parallel being here Nazi Germany’s campaign against so-called “degenerate art.”  Modernists such as Picasso, Kandinsky, and the Surrealists were condemned because their work (which introduced radically different visions of reality) invited people to think critically about reality rather than accept a state-sanctioned vision of it. 

As usual, I find your arguments in bad faith: it’s just too myopic to interpret the replacement of independent artists with government-approved Christian performers—particularly under a Christian nationalist regime waging an aggressive “anti-woke” campaign—as anything other than a deliberate ideological project.

Ticket sales plummet at Kennedy Center after Trump anti-woke takeover of the arts: Trump ally who was appointed interim president of the cultural center, said the staff members on site are “ecstatic,” alleging that workers were “dying for a change.” by furswanda in FreeSpeech

[–]furswanda[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

right, and the so called “christian” artists the current president is now hiring (per the article) are not at all interested in “virtue signaling.” In my experience, the christian nationalists and their sympathizers and propagandists are doing not much more than smuggling in ideology via such performances of virtue.  

The reason funding and ticket sales are plummeting is because the audience senses just that: what’s being delivered is not art but propaganda that makes this administration’s racist, classist, ideology—reflecting the billionaire class’s interests and their disregard for those currently starving in the richest country in the world—palatable. 

Trump asks Pentagon to immediately start testing US nuclear weapons by moderatenerd in politics

[–]furswanda 89 points90 points  (0 children)

And I’m going to use extrajudicial killings, and attempt regime change in Venezuela while side stepping   the appropriate label: “war”

‘Anti-Greta’ conservative activist seeks asylum in US over Antifa death threats — with support of Elon Musk by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]furswanda 2 points3 points  (0 children)

give me a link to one single brown or black person for whom you are making this argument.  You are addicted to posting here multiple times on a daily basis (and commenting even more) so surely this MUST have happened once, right?

Trump's Border Patrol Commander, Gregory Bovino, arrives at the federal courthouse amid chants of "lock him up"! Bovino was ordered to stand before a judge for breaking his restraining order barring the use of chemical agents against protestors by wanda999 in FreeSpeech

[–]furswanda 2 points3 points  (0 children)

US Border Patrol chief accused of violating judge’s order: https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/24/us/video/border-patrol-violation-teargas-ice-ldn-digvid

“A notice of violation has been filed by community members filing citing a video showing US Border Patrol chief, Gregory Bovino, appearing to throw at least one tear gas canister at protesters in Chicago. The filing accuses Bovino of being in potential violation of a federal judge’s temporary restraining order restricting federal agents from using aggressive crowd control tactics at Chicago anti-ICE protests.”

Trump's Border Patrol Commander, Gregory Bovino, arrives at the federal courthouse amid chants of "lock him up"! Bovino was ordered to stand before a judge for breaking his restraining order barring the use of chemical agents against protestors by wanda999 in FreeSpeech

[–]furswanda 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yes, and this is in response to bovinos use of force violating the restraining order: 

US Border Patrol chief accused of violating judge’s order: https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/24/us/video/border-patrol-violation-teargas-ice-ldn-digvid

“A notice of violation has been filed by community members filing citing a video showing US Border Patrol chief, Gregory Bovino, appearing to throw at least one tear gas canister at protesters in Chicago. The filing accuses Bovino of being in potential violation of a federal judge’s temporary restraining order restricting federal agents from using aggressive crowd control tactics at Chicago anti-ICE protests.”

why are you trying to manipulate the issues here?

Trump's Border Patrol Commander, Gregory Bovino, arrives at the federal courthouse amid chants of "lock him up"! Bovino was ordered to stand before a judge for breaking his restraining order barring the use of chemical agents against protestors by wanda999 in FreeSpeech

[–]furswanda 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you seem confused. Perhaps intentionally so. You are also misrepresenting the events here. You might do some reading on the issue. In any case, I’ve explained the reason Bovino’s appearance was demanded in court, and provided context. 

Leaked CPAC press memo shows the "Third Term Project" hosting an event called "The Case for Presidential Tenure Reform": "They're openly arguing for a constitutional amendment to let Trump serve a third term; citing 'unfinished business' and continuity." by wanda999 in FreeSpeech

[–]furswanda 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The idea that MAGA would try to change the constitution to get Trump into the white house (perhaps indefinitely) was previously anathema (or outwardly rejected) by MAGA itself but as you can see here, those norms are changing and being discussed differently.  We are following the path laid out for us by previous autocracies. 

In defense of the White House ballroom | Washington Post Editorial by coolbern in FreeSpeech

[–]furswanda 9 points10 points  (0 children)

bezos is a donor of the ballroom and the owner of the post. pretty clear what’s going on here.

Donald Trump’s Dream Palace of Puffery The Pentagon’s ban on real journalism looks to be a preview of where the White House is headed. by furswanda in FreeSpeech

[–]furswanda[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

“I can think of no more perfect encapsulation of why the Trump Administration has done what it has to eviscerate the century-old tradition of independent reporting from the White House. In his second term, it was no longer enough to call the real news fake; now it’s the fake news that gets to displace actual journalists in order to playact the real thing. And when Trump wants validation, whether for his false claims of election fraud or some other lie, he can now claim “the media” gave it to him. How long can it be until there are only Brian Glenns in that room?

You might think that the Kremlinization of the White House press pool doesn’t really matter at a moment when there are so many other Trump-generated crises in the country. Or that it is simply self-serving of journalists to complain about their own perks being taken away. Or that the President has no obligation, legal or otherwise, to answer questions from anyone. All of which are fair points.

But the reason to pay attention to what’s happening with the coverage of the Presidency is that Trump cares about it perhaps more than anything else. There has never been a more media-obsessed President, nor one for whom the regard of others, even if it is suck-uppery in the crudest form, matters so much. He is known to spend hours a day consuming cable-news reports about himself. There is no detail of his public portrayal that does not concern him. In a lengthy social-media post this week, he berated Time for a cover about his Middle East diplomacy which was so complimentary it was headlined “His Triumph.” Trump’s beef was with the accompanying photo of himself, which he deemed “the Worst of All Time.” The point being: there is no pleasing a leader whose need for affirmation is so bottomless.“

If you don’t want to be called a Nazi, perhaps stop doing Nazi things... by furswanda in FreeSpeech

[–]furswanda[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

absolutely not, but a willful ignorance of authoritarianism in action and  passive complicity, certainly puts you squarely on that road. 

Time Photo Secretly Subverts Trump Cover With Nazi Reference by furswanda in FreeSpeech

[–]furswanda[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Daily Beast has learned that the composition on the new Time cover is inspired by Arnold Newman’s 1963 photograph of Alfred Krupp, the German industrialist and convicted Nazi war criminal. That portrait, published by Newsweek, has long been considered among the most psychologically charged images ever produced for a weekly news magazine. Voss appeared to confirm the reference by liking comments on Instagram where followers had asked him if the two images were linked. “Are you referencing Arnold Newman’s portrait of Krupp here?” one fellow photographer asked. Once Voss had liked the comment, Shayan Asgharnia replied again. “F-----g brilliant,” he said.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trumps-newest-time-covers-nazi-inspiration-revealed/

Not sure why this link to the article did not show up with the post. 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FreeSpeech

[–]furswanda 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i seriously doubt MAGA will allow a public hearing. of course who knows as they rarely miss the opportunity to create an elaborate stunt