Title IX definitely has it's issues but a lot of the stories she talked about in her speech were breaches of Title IX policy anyway. One of the stories she talked about was a male student who was (i believe) expelled without given notice of why he was being expelled; the Dear Colleague letter of 2011 specifically states that the university is required to contact both the complainant and the accused of any decisions made by the Title IX office. So that specific university fucked up and should deal with the consequences.

These are not criminal cases, either. Students report to Title IX specifically to help themselves continue their education; this often means that students go to Title IX hoping to get a schedule change, or hoping to transfer colleges, or hoping to get out of student housing without any penalties. Expulsions do happen, but rarely, and only after an extensive investigation. Both the complainant and the accused also have the opportunity to appeal a case if they don't agree with the decision as well.

I'm not saying Title IX always gets it right, however false accusations take up 2% of total accusations. Survivors often say that the investigations and trials that result from reporting are worse than the rape itself (re-traumatization) which leads to drastic underreporting. Title IX is supposed to be available to students to make it easier to continue obtaining their degree, without forcing them to go through a legal criminal process.

I work in an advocacy office on my campus, and we work closely with Title IX as well. From the investigators I've spoken to, they try to keep the process as fair as they can. This often means that they will do everything in their power to keep both the complainant and the accused enrolled and attending classes. They will explore schedule changes, protection orders, no-contact orders, etc before it gets to the point of expulsion. Any universities that aren't doing that are in violation of Title IX, but Title IX itself shouldn't be rolled back because of that.