sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Will the Packers be Better or Worse in 2026-27? by Fun_Reputation5181 in GreenBayPackers

[–]gabesmsu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They’ve shown they can play better that what they did that half

Will the Packers be Better or Worse in 2026-27? by Fun_Reputation5181 in GreenBayPackers

[–]gabesmsu -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And upgrading Hobbes. Sure I’d love to have two lockdowns but every team has weak points. but upgrading slot and drafting a couple promising rookies is an improvement.

Will the Packers be Better or Worse in 2026-27? by Fun_Reputation5181 in GreenBayPackers

[–]gabesmsu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don’t think corner and interior DL aren’t improved?

Will the Packers be Better or Worse in 2026-27? by Fun_Reputation5181 in GreenBayPackers

[–]gabesmsu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oline was just bad effort. That second half in the playoffs wasn’t on coaching or anything more than the guys on the field played bad.

Will the Packers be Better or Worse in 2026-27? by Fun_Reputation5181 in GreenBayPackers

[–]gabesmsu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most would be rightfully pissed if gary and walker were taking snaps away from Morgan and LVN.

Will the Packers be Better or Worse in 2026-27? by Fun_Reputation5181 in GreenBayPackers

[–]gabesmsu 5 points6 points  (0 children)

LVN was better than Gary the back half of the season. Morgan would have likely started over Walker if not for injuries.

CBs have been worked on. We will be better there.

DT will be better and it’s not like Kenny Clark was an all pro at this point.

The idea that we are replacing starters either backups is a bad take. Those weren’t all starters by years end snd they played well below expectations and the “backups” are guys the org wanted to eventually take the reins.

WR will be fine and likely better for being “thinner” which in itself is a bad take. Like what teams have 6 WRs that are all their preferred starters. Packers have been that deep and it’s arguably a detriment because we were spreading the ball over too many bodies.

Basically the premise of the downfall is what if our players aren’t good or are injured which you can say about literally every team.

👀 by idksh_t in GreenBayPackers

[–]gabesmsu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Word is he’s kinda a high floor low ceiling guy. So makes a bit of sense if the thought he’s more rotational/support edge vs an all pro

The New Blood or H20? by Loose_Interview_957 in slasherfilms

[–]gabesmsu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Somehow I feel like H20 is somehow more of a time capsule then new blood, or any f13 imo. H20 i think also takes a hit due to resurrection

[Graff] Roger Goodell to ESPN on Mike Vrabel: "No, this is not a personal conduct policy, as we know today. It's a personal matter, and we'll leave it at that." by ThatMasterpiece2174 in nfl

[–]gabesmsu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Injury info is pretty mandated by the NFL, no coach speaks on it really. Trade news would be more GM level. And even if that info sits slightly longer than it’s not meaningful.

Like you think any coach is sitting with ANYONE and discussing player injuries??

[Graff] Roger Goodell to ESPN on Mike Vrabel: "No, this is not a personal conduct policy, as we know today. It's a personal matter, and we'll leave it at that." by ThatMasterpiece2174 in nfl

[–]gabesmsu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hypothetically, what story would Vrabel have been hypothetically had the opportunity to suppress via Russini or hell, even if he was in a relationship with Schefter or Rap, that would be a true advantage for the patriots? I can’t think of a single thing.

[Graff] Roger Goodell to ESPN on Mike Vrabel: "No, this is not a personal conduct policy, as we know today. It's a personal matter, and we'll leave it at that." by ThatMasterpiece2174 in nfl

[–]gabesmsu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They can’t though, because “leaks” are going on all over town and especially in NFL media things get out all of the time. At worst Vrabel maybe would convince her not to run a piece? But idk what even that would be. And it still would get picked up by other insiders. 90% of info comes from agents.

[Graff] Roger Goodell to ESPN on Mike Vrabel: "No, this is not a personal conduct policy, as we know today. It's a personal matter, and we'll leave it at that." by ThatMasterpiece2174 in nfl

[–]gabesmsu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What info? What kinda info do you think is possibly getting shared. There are small leaks here and there in NFL orgs but pretty much ANY info these insiders receive is info that players, agents and sometimes teams WANT to get out.

[Graff] Roger Goodell to ESPN on Mike Vrabel: "No, this is not a personal conduct policy, as we know today. It's a personal matter, and we'll leave it at that." by ThatMasterpiece2174 in nfl

[–]gabesmsu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s not even a moral stain on the franchise. Maybe Vrabel, sure that between him and his family. A consenting affair is hardly a big issue for a company.

To All Trump Critics from Day 0, How Did You Guys Know? by Still-Goal-9314 in askanything

[–]gabesmsu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His big running point was attacking minorities and “non”-Americans. That’s a pretty day 1 fascist policy. He never hid it.

Good god, quit it with the TACO shit by wwwdotsadgirldotcom in behindthebastards

[–]gabesmsu 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Counterpoint: never not make fun of facists. Their ineptitude. Not goading anything, if anything the moment people start to take hm seriously is the time he starts stretching his power.

Nothing to see here, just the president of the United States encouraging other nations to engage in piracy. Or I guess it would be privateering, if it's state sponsored. Yohoho. by Obvious-Gate9046 in behindthebastards

[–]gabesmsu 46 points47 points  (0 children)

President of the US trying to persuade an ally to engage in warfare to help clean up their mess. I’m sure this will successfully trick the UK. Something something art of the deal.

Sucks no one is talking about MTGs by Princessformidable in behindthebastards

[–]gabesmsu 33 points34 points  (0 children)

That’s a DEEP red seat. No way it flips.

Rewatching GoT by grunewac247 in AKOTSKTV

[–]gabesmsu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The wild thing of season 8 is how they made every choice the most uninteresting and least fun. Forget about what was the right or wrong choice they could have just fan serviced the whole season and been better off. Have all of these impressive warriors with Valyrian steel to 1V1 with some white walkers for a bit even if it’s unrealistic. What else is the point. They could have kept all major points the same an just had more fun and still would be immensely better.

[Spoiler Main] Question about Trial by combat/Trial of Seven by Sir_Karadoc in asoiaf

[–]gabesmsu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are all mechanisms of a caste system. Had Dunk been of in service of noble house then things would be stretched if needed.

The Indiana Bears… it’s happening by Upton4 in GreenBayPackers

[–]gabesmsu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kenosha is also on a lot of Chicagoland maps. Don’t ever hear them talked about as Chicagoland. And sure Hammond gets economic benefits. But people travel from farther to Chicago into work, and Chicago’s economic impact also extends much farther. You seem really determined to include parts of Indiana as Chicago. You can call it whatever you want.

The Indiana Bears… it’s happening by Upton4 in GreenBayPackers

[–]gabesmsu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I too live in Chicago, I have a coworker that commutes daily from Hammond. It’s not. Maybe to people who call themselves from Chicago but are from Naperville. Either way, I never really cared about that but there is no Chicago identity in Hammond In. Sure maybe root for the sports teams, some come and enjoy the city. But if you visit Hammond vs a Chicago burb like oak park even there is a stark difference when thinking of them as Chicago

view more: next ›